Re: [DISCUSS] Draft board report for Apr 2021

Thanks a lot for your comments, Francis and Stamatis. I will delete the meeting of Apr 26th. > I second Stamatis' suggestion to include the more detailed description > of the project that we used previously. Do you mean "commits by non-committers" and "top-5 reviewers"? Do you know the tool or

Re: Reset/restart CI

PR is already created and UT are all passed for a few days: https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/2404. About the Github ENV, I think we are not authorized to do this. The PR merge is blocked for some days, let's done this ASAP. Regards! Aron Tao Julian Hyde 于2021年4月19日周一 上午3:21写道： > Aron

Re: [DISCUSS] Draft board report for Apr 2021

+1 looks great! I second Stamatis' suggestion to include the more detailed description of the project that we used previously. On 19/04/2021 8:10 am, Stamatis Zampetakis wrote: Thanks for putting this together Haisheng. I have only a few small comments. I like the more extended description

Re: [DISCUSS] Draft board report for Apr 2021

Thanks for putting this together Haisheng. I have only a few small comments. I like the more extended description that we had in previous reports. I would keep the same. The meeting of Apr 26th should be on the next report for Q2, not this one. Usually the board asks for some insights apart

Re: Reset/restart CI

Aron & Alessandro, Can you discuss & come to consensus in https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4587 , and create a PR. Julian > On Apr 17, 2021, at 10:12 PM, JiaTao Tao wrote: > > Yes, I believe set ENV can archive the same