Re: [DISCUSS] Towards Calcite 1.27.0

Hi all, I am currently preparing the first release candidate for 1.27.0. Please do not commit to master, until further notice. Best, Stamatis On Fri, May 28, 2021 at 4:15 PM Stamatis Zampetakis wrote: > I did a pass over the JIRA issues marked for 1.27.0 release. > I moved some that were

Re: [DISCUSS] Towards Calcite 1.27.0

I did a pass over the JIRA issues marked for 1.27.0 release. I moved some that were promising but not close to be resolved in 1.28.0 and for others that there was not much (or any) progress I removed the fix version tag. After the cleanup it seems that there are three/four issues [1] that could

Re: [DISCUSS] Towards Calcite 1.27.0

I'll pick 3-5 PRs too. Ruben On Mon, May 24, 2021 at 8:34 PM Julian Hyde wrote: > Thanks Rui! Just pick 5 PRs that look interesting to you, and assign the > JIRA to yourself (as active reviewer). If you need help/advice, mention > people in the JIRA comments. > > We need 4 more volunteers… > >

Re: [DISCUSS] Towards Calcite 1.27.0

Thanks Rui! Just pick 5 PRs that look interesting to you, and assign the JIRA to yourself (as active reviewer). If you need help/advice, mention people in the JIRA comments. We need 4 more volunteers… Julian > On May 24, 2021, at 11:28 AM, Rui Wang wrote: > > Please tag me on PRs that you

Re: [DISCUSS] Towards Calcite 1.27.0

Please tag me on PRs that you need my help. I will check those soon. -Rui On Mon, May 24, 2021 at 11:06 AM Julian Hyde wrote: > We still need 5 committers to review 5 PRs each. Please reply to this > email to volunteer. > > On Fri, May 21, 2021 at 3:41 PM Stamatis Zampetakis > wrote: > > > >

Re: [DISCUSS] Towards Calcite 1.27.0

We still need 5 committers to review 5 PRs each. Please reply to this email to volunteer. On Fri, May 21, 2021 at 3:41 PM Stamatis Zampetakis wrote: > > I agree with Julian, we should get the 1.27.0 out as soon as possible. > > I can try to prepare RC0 between the 28 and 30 of May, if people

Re: [DISCUSS] Towards Calcite 1.27.0

I agree with Julian, we should get the 1.27.0 out as soon as possible. I can try to prepare RC0 between the 28 and 30 of May, if people agree on this. Alternatively, I will have a bit more time around 17 to 20 of June. I will try to get 2-3 PRs in before starting the RC. Best, Stamatis On

Re: [DISCUSS] Towards Calcite 1.27.0

Now Avatica 1.18 has been released (thanks, Francis!) we should press on with Calcite 1.27. Who is release manager? Stamatis, You volunteered to be release manager for 1.27 [1] but I would be happy to jump in. Let me know. There is a backlog of PRs that look good enough to go into 1.27. How to

Re: [DISCUSS] Towards Calcite 1.27.0

Many thanks for moving this forward Julian, much appreciated. At the moment the main blocker is the Avatica release ([1,2]) that in turn waits for CALCITE-4503 [3]. It would be great if somebody has some cycles to review and merge the respective PR [4]. Best, Stamatis [1]

Re: [DISCUSS] Towards Calcite 1.27.0

Vladimir, Thanks for finding this bug. Please log it. I don't intend to fix any more bugs in this area before 1.27. It has been a huge effort on my part, and I have not received any help from anyone. Julian On Wed, Feb 24, 2021 at 3:57 PM Vladimir Sitnikov wrote: > > Thanks for pushing this

Re: [DISCUSS] Towards Calcite 1.27.0

Thanks for pushing this forward. Would you please add search/sarg shrinking to RexShrinker? There are failures though: @Test void singleFuzzyTest() { Random r = new Random(); r.setSeed(6321443803263498676L); RexFuzzer fuzzer = new RexFuzzer(rexBuilder, typeFactory);

Re: [DISCUSS] Towards Calcite 1.27.0

I have a PR for CALCITE-4446, https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/2357. I'd be grateful if people could review & test. On Mon, Feb 22, 2021 at 12:39 PM Julian Hyde wrote: > > I’m working hard on 4446. It may still be a few days. > > > On Feb 21, 2021, at 1:00 PM, Stamatis Zampetakis wrote: >

Re: [DISCUSS] Towards Calcite 1.27.0

I’m working hard on 4446. It may still be a few days. > On Feb 21, 2021, at 1:00 PM, Stamatis Zampetakis wrote: > > At the moment we are mainly waiting for CALCITE-4446 [1], CALCITE-4488 [2], > for preparing the first RC for 1.27.0. > > I know that some people started testing the current

Re: [DISCUSS] Towards Calcite 1.27.0

At the moment we are mainly waiting for CALCITE-4446 [1], CALCITE-4488 [2], for preparing the first RC for 1.27.0. I know that some people started testing the current master (thanks!) and it would be great if others start doing so as soon as possible in order to have a smooth release. If testing

Re: [DISCUSS] Towards Calcite 1.27.0

OK so if I understand well for the next release we should aim to finish CALCITE-4446, CALCITE-4405, and CALCITE-4487. It would be good if people can test 1.26.0 or the current master now so that we can see what else needs to be done for 1.27.0. Best, Stamatis On Wed, Feb 3, 2021 at 9:46 AM

Re: [DISCUSS] Towards Calcite 1.27.0

Julian>because we never had a test case that indicated how actual behavior differed from desired behavior One of the tests has been included in Calcite sources for a while. Please refer to RexProgramFuzzyTest that I previously highlighted in "Search/Sarg: untested feature merged to the default

Re: [DISCUSS] Towards Calcite 1.27.0

I am happy to be RM for Avatica 1.18.0 (will start a new discussion for it). If we are planning to release Avatica 1.18.0 before Calcite 1.27.0, the Calcite release will have to be pushed back. This might not necessary be a bad thing as we can buy more time to work through the issues in

Re: [DISCUSS] Towards Calcite 1.27.0

I think we should release Avatica 1.18 BEFORE Calcite 1.27. I just merged a fix to an important bug https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4476 , and it would be good if it got into Calcite 1.27. I agree that we need to solve Sargs.

Re: [DISCUSS] Towards Calcite 1.27.0

The proposed schedule looks good to me. I also agree that we need to reach a consensus on SARGs for this release. It's also been a while since Avatica has had a release, so I think it would be a good idea to release Avatica 1.18.0 after Calcite 1.27.0 is released. Francis On 3/02/2021

[DISCUSS] Towards Calcite 1.27.0

Hi all, It's been almost 4 months since our last release so I would like to kick off the discussion for 1.27.0. I could try to prepare an RC around the 12th of February but I would like to hear your thoughts. As usual we have lots of pull requests [1] and a couple of JIRAs tagged for this