Thanks for your fast response. I've created
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6394 to discuss about that.
Gonzalo,
I think the implementation is fairly straightforward. You’d write a new
implementation of RelWriter.
But, as Alessandro says, the specification is the hard part. What *exactly*
would you want instead of $0? (Those fields have names, and most of the time
they are the same as the user
Hi Gonzalo,
what would you expect when $i points to a complex expression from the input
relation(s)?
It's easier to brainstorm around a concrete running example, would you have
one to share? (existing vs sought behavior)
Best regards,
Alessandro
On Tue, 30 Apr 2024 at 12:39, Gonzalo Ortiz
Hi community,
I'm trying to improve explain plans in Apache Pinot and one of the main
complaints of our customers is how difficult it is to read the explain
plans having to transform the synthetic input names into the corresponding
logical field.
Is there a way to improve that? Ideally these