Thanks Julian, it's really helpful. Just want to make sure there's no
duplicated efforts.
On Sun, Sep 18, 2016 at 12:57 AM, Julian Hyde wrote:
> I find it frustrating when you ask “are there plans to…”. Calcite is a
> volunteer project. I don’t know what other contributors are
Thank you for the quick response Julian,
I am interested mainly in logical transformation rules. I try to create an
optimized logical plan and transform it in a physical one in my engine. The
engine is streaming and uses ByteBuffers, and I am wondering if it is
possible to optimize simple queries
+1
Downloaded, checked signatures, LICENSE, NOTICE, README, compiled, ran tests.
Note: When I imported your keys I got the message
gpg: Signature made Sat Sep 17 01:05:57 2016 PDT
gpg:using RSA key 0x931E4AB3C516B444
gpg: Good signature from "Jesus Camacho Rodriguez
I find it frustrating when you ask “are there plans to…”. Calcite is a
volunteer project. I don’t know what other contributors are doing, and I don’t
control their time. If someone is working on something, they will have logged a
JIRA case and marked it “in progress” or set the “fix version”
Hi,
I just did a random "Calcite" search on upwork.com and it turned out
there's a research job to apply Calcite to a real project.
https://www.upwork.com/jobs/_~01e957c78cc8972025/
>Work on a 5-7 week PoC to use Apache Calcite (or other tools proposed)
>to map between a Legacy and Target SQL
The form of your test data depends on the kind of rules you are writing. If you
are aiming to push down a lot of operations down to a particular engine (e.g.
Druid can handle everything except Join) then you should run on that engine. If
you are interested mainly in logical transformation rules
Hi,
I am trying to create a basic planner that enforces rules on simple
queries. At the moment I have created a planner from the examples (and
samza-sql integration I found online) and used HepPlanner for testing some
rules. My question is which form should my test data be? I am using
something
I think I made some mistake cleaning my local repo, sorry about that...
Cancelling the vote, I will create a new RC and start a new vote shortly.
Thanks,
Jesús
On 9/17/16, 1:43 AM, "Julian Hyde" wrote:
>-1 (binding)
>
>Downloaded, checked hashes, LICENSE, NOTICE; built on