Calcite-Master - Build # 173 - Still Failing

The Apache Jenkins build system has built Calcite-Master (build #173) Status: Still Failing Check console output at https://builds.apache.org/job/Calcite-Master/173/ to view the results.

Re: Maven wrapper

We already have a tool that provides a container for the whole build process. That tool is maven. I do not recall a time where someone had problems because they had the wrong version of maven installed; so this is a non-problem. I’ve written C/C++ projects before (using autoconf, libtool, mingw

Re: Maven wrapper

Yes. But I claim that adding mvnw to the picture makes things more complicated for the typical user, because there are now more options to understand. Julian > On Jan 2, 2018, at 2:00 PM, Michael Mior wrote: > > Even if we do include mvnw, isn't it still possible to use a

Re: Maven wrapper

Even if we do include mvnw, isn't it still possible to use a compatible mvn directly? -- Michael Mior mm...@apache.org 2018-01-02 15:35 GMT-05:00 Julian Hyde : > True, but for 2 and 3 it’s not much of a hardship to type > > $ /usr/local/maven-x.y.z/bin/mvn -s my-settings.xml

Re: Maven wrapper

True, but for 2 and 3 it’s not much of a hardship to type $ /usr/local/maven-x.y.z/bin/mvn -s my-settings.xml target rather than $ mvn target And for 1, I claim that typing “mvn” is less surprising to most people than typing “mvnw”. Because most people who build java code these days are

Re: Maven wrapper

>Multiple versions of Maven can be installed side-by-side (and we don't have esoteric requirements). As such, I don't see the need for such a change The reasons could include: 1) Simplified Apache Maven installation for those who have no experience with it 2) Having multiple settings.xml files

Re: [DISCUSS] Draft board report

Good point! The last Avatica release aged out of those populated by the reporting tool but I think it makes sense to include the latest Avatica release as well. -- Michael Mior mm...@apache.org 2018-01-02 14:36 GMT-05:00 Josh Elser : > +1 > > Maybe include the last Avatica

Re: [DISCUSS] Draft board report

+1 Maybe include the last Avatica release too? (1.10.0 on 2017/05/29) On 12/31/17 5:39 PM, Michael Mior wrote: See below a draft of the board report for Jan. 17. I borrowed heavily from past reports and the release notes but I think the necessary points are covered. If there's any activity I'm

Re: Maven wrapper

Well put, all. I think I would be -1 on such a change without better/specific reasons as to what is broken/bad. Multiple versions of Maven can be installed side-by-side (and we don't have esoteric requirements). As such, I don't see the need for such a change. On 12/31/17 2:27 AM, Julian