Calcite does not support implicit type cast yet, so it is strict for type
compare, e.g. two decimals with different precision or scale will be considered
different type. For timestamp(3) and varchar, they are definitely different
data types.
You can make explicit type cast before inserting
Hi,
My Name is Wangminhao Gou,I hava used calcite to operate several relational
databases including PG，however，when I want to insert timestamp value，there is
an exception.The information is like this:
org.apache.calcite.runtime.CalciteContextException: From line 1, column 47 to
line 1, column
Would anyone be interested in finishing CALCITE-2322
(https://github.com/apache/calcite-avatica/pull/49)?
There were some minor changes that were requested, but the original
author has disappeared. There does not appear to be any tests for the
change, but I am not sure how much work is
Are you suggesting this only for UNION? I assume not, but I'm not sure I
see how the approach you're suggesting will generalize. Of course, we also
need to consider *how* to reuse the results of the expression.
The approach sounds like it could be reasonable, but I don't fully
understand what
Sorry for messing up the site branch as part of the 1.19.0 release. I think
I missed the fast forward flag on the merge.
Thanks to all for cleaning it up.
+1 to Francis' suggestion to make the site docs more clear. I think that
was the hardest part of the release. I'll try to set some time aside
I see the CI of the last commit is passed now:
https://travis-ci.org/apache/calcite/builds/512347766?utm_source=github_status_medium=notification
But the build status of GitHub commit (the yellow point after "committed
xx days ago") is still now being synced.
Hongze
-- Original Message
Yes. I also find some updates in https://www.traviscistatus.com/. Maybe we
should just wait.
Bests,
Chunwei
--
发件人：Yuzhao Chen
发送时间：2019年3月28日(星期四) 15:05
收件人：dev ; 雷春蔚(勿烦)
主 题：Re: master build broken
It seems all the
It seems all the Travis buildings are stuck at state Waiting to be queued.
Best,
Danny Chan
在 2019年3月28日 +0800 PM2:40，雷春蔚(勿烦) ，写道：
> Hi,
> I notice that the travis-ci build of a new PR is much slower than before and
> Calcite master looks like still build broken. Is anybody looking into it?
>
>
I will take a look.
Best,
Danny Chan
在 2019年3月28日 +0800 PM2:40，雷春蔚(勿烦) ，写道：
> Hi,
> I notice that the travis-ci build of a new PR is much slower than before and
> Calcite master looks like still build broken. Is anybody looking into it?
>
>
>
> Bests,
> Chunwei
