Thanks Albert.
you could probably refer to osdi paper "resin general sub query fusion"
> which has chapters talking about general union fusion that deals with the
> case Julian pointed out.
>
The optimization seems very helpful, but it introduces new operators and
the rule for new operators may
Gavin, Thanks for the kind words.
All, I have now squashed and rebased onto latest master. The squashed commit is
https://github.com/julianhyde/calcite/commit/cb59231a72e23be260b21670012af33c47c2610e.
I plan to merge to master on Monday.
Jacques, You may wish to carefully review my changes to
On a more general fusion case, you could probably refer to osdi paper
"resin general sub query fusion" which has chapters talking about general
union fusion that deals with the case Julian pointed out.
Btw, per my understanding cases of union fusion is not that many in
practice. Curious to know
I think '=' is being shown because by "format json" the statement produced a
JSON value expression rather than a regular
JSON string. Ideally "format json" should not be at the rhs of a select item
and the validator should complain about
that. So there could be a missing check rule in validator.
Congrats!
Enrico
Il Sab 22 Gen 2022, 03:03 xiong duan ha scritto:
> Congratulations to Ruben and thanks to Haisheng!
>
> Danny Chan 于2022年1月21日周五 12:19写道：
>
> > Congratulations, Ruben, and good luck!
> >
> > Haisheng, Thank you for serving as Chair.
> >
> > Yanjing Wang 于2022年1月21日
Thank you for doing this, after reading the overview these changes seem
like they will make a number of things easier related to testing.
Super useful too when you're trying to start building something with
Calcite but don't know it well enough to figure out how to put all the
pieces together
Hi,
Agree with you the equals seems wrong as well but don't have time to
investigate. Contributions are welcomed.
Best,
Stamatis
On Tue, Jan 18, 2022 at 10:17 PM M Singh
wrote:
> Hi Stamatis:
> Here is the JIRA ticket -
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4989
> Thanks again for
I try to answer the first question. The materialized view rewriting of
`SubstitutionVisitor` is based on the equivalent replacement of relational
algebra expressions. Disadvantages of it are explained on the website [1].
1. it might need to enumerate exhaustively all possible equivalent
