Re: JDK 8 syntax
;>> at > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler.compileGet2(UnitCompiler. > >>>>>>>>>> java:4737) > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler.access$8300( > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> UnitCompiler.java:212) > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler$12.visitMethodInvocation( > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> UnitCompiler.java:4097) > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler$12.visitMethodInvocation( > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> UnitCompiler.java:4070) > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>> org.codehaus.janino.Java$MethodInvocation.accept(Java.java:4902) > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler.compileGet( > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> UnitCompiler.java:4070) > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler.compileGetValue( > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> UnitCompiler.java:5253) > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler.compileGet2(UnitCompiler. > >>>>>>>>>> java:4696) > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler.access$7800( > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> UnitCompiler.java:212) > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler$12.visitCast(UnitCompiler.java:4092) > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler$12.visitCast(UnitCompiler.java:4070) > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at > >>>>> org.codehaus.janino.Java$Cast.accept(Java.java:4727) > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler.compileGet( > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> UnitCompiler.java:4070) > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler.compileGet2(UnitCompiler. > >>>>>>>>>> java:4732) > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler.access$7300( > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> UnitCompiler.java:212) > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler$12$1. > >>>>>> visitParenthesizedExpr > >>>>>>>>>> ession( > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> UnitCompiler.java:4083) > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler$12$1. > >>>>>> visitParenthesizedExpr > >>>>>>>>>> ession( > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> UnitCompiler.java:4074) > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> org.codehaus.janino.Java$ParenthesizedExpression. > >>&g
Re: JDK 8 syntax
t;> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler.compileGetValue( >>>>>>>>>>>>>> UnitCompiler.java:5253) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler.compileGet2(UnitCompiler. >>>>>>>>>> java:4696) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler.access$7800( >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> UnitCompiler.java:212) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler$12.visitCast(UnitCompiler.java:4092) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler$12.visitCast(UnitCompiler.java:4070) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at >>>>> org.codehaus.janino.Java$Cast.accept(Java.java:4727) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler.compileGet( >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> UnitCompiler.java:4070) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler.compileGet2(UnitCompiler. >>>>>>>>>> java:4732) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler.access$7300( >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> UnitCompiler.java:212) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler$12$1. >>>>>> visitParenthesizedExpr >>>>>>>>>> ession( >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> UnitCompiler.java:4083) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler$12$1. >>>>>> visitParenthesizedExpr >>>>>>>>>> ession( >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> UnitCompiler.java:4074) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> org.codehaus.janino.Java$ParenthesizedExpression. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> accept(Java.java:4753) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler$12.visitLvalue( >>>>>>>>>>>>>> UnitCompiler.java:4074) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler$12.visitLvalue( >>>>>>>>>>>>>> UnitCompiler.java:4070) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at org.codehaus.janino.Java$ >>>>>> Lvalue.accept(Java.java:3977) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler.compileGet( >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> UnitCompiler.java:4070) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler.compileGetValue( >>>>>>>>>>>>>> UnitCompiler.java:5253) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler.compileGet2(UnitCompiler. >>>>>>>>>> java:4792) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler.access$8300( >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> UnitCompiler.java:212) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>
Re: JDK 8 syntax
> > >>>> at > >>> > >> >> >>> > >>> > >>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler$12.visitMethodInvocation( > >>> > >> >> >>> > >> UnitCompiler.java:4070) > >>> > >> >> >>> > >>>> at > >>> > >> >> >>> > >>> org.codehaus.janino.Java$MethodInvocation.accept(Java.java:4902) > >>> > >> >> >>> > >>>> at org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler.compileGet( > >>> > >> >> >>> > >> UnitCompiler.java:4070) > >>> > >> >> >>> > >>>> at > >>> > >> >> >>> > >>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler.compileGetValue( > >>> > >> >> >>> > UnitCompiler.java:5253) > >>> > >> >> >>> > >>>> at > >>> > >> >> >>> > >>> > >>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler.compileGet2(UnitCompiler. > >>> > >> >> java:4696) > >>> > >> >> >>> > >>>> at org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler.access$7800( > >>> > >> >> >>> > >> UnitCompiler.java:212) > >>> > >> >> >>> > >>>> at > >>> > >> >> >>> > >>> > >>> > >> >> >>> > >>> > >> > >>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler$12.visitCast(UnitCompiler.java:4092) > >>> > >> >> >>> > >>>> at > >>> > >> >> >>> > >>> > >>> > >> >> >>> > >>> > >> > >>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler$12.visitCast(UnitCompiler.java:4070) > >>> > >> >> >>> > >>>> at > >>> org.codehaus.janino.Java$Cast.accept(Java.java:4727) > >>> > >> >> >>> > >>>> at org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler.compileGet( > >>> > >> >> >>> > >> UnitCompiler.java:4070) > >>> > >> >> >>> > >>>> at > >>> > >> >> >>> > >>> > >>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler.compileGet2(UnitCompiler. > >>> > >> >> java:4732) > >>> > >> >> >>> > >>>> at org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler.access$7300( > >>> > >> >> >>> > >> UnitCompiler.java:212) > >>> > >> >> >>> > >>>> at > >>> > >> >> >>> > >>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler$12$1. > >>> > visitParenthesizedExpr > >>> > >> >> ession( > >>> > >> >> >>> > >> UnitC
Re: JDK 8 syntax
t; > >>>> at >>> > >> >> >>> > >>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler$12$1. >>> > visitParenthesizedExpr >>> > >> >> ession( >>> > >> >> >>> > >> UnitCompiler.java:4083) >>> > >> >> >>> > >>>> at >>> > >> >> >>> > >>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler$12$1. >>> > visitParenthesizedExpr >>> > >> >> ession( >>> > >> >> >>> > >> UnitCompiler.java:4074) >>> > >> >> >>> > >>>> at >>> > >> >> >>> > >>> org.codehaus.janino.Java$ParenthesizedExpression. >>> > >> >> >>> > accept(Java.java:4753) >>> > >> >> >>> > >>>> at >>> > >> >> >>> > >>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler$12.visitLvalue( >>> > >> >> >>> > UnitCompiler.java:4074) >>> > >> >> >>> > >>>> at >>> > >> >> >>> > >>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler$12.visitLvalue( >>> > >> >> >>> > UnitCompiler.java:4070) >>> > >> >> >>> > >>>> at org.codehaus.janino.Java$ >>> > Lvalue.accept(Java.java:3977) >>> > >> >> >>> > >>>> at org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler.compileGet( >>> > >> >> >>> > >> UnitCompiler.java:4070) >>> > >> >> >>> > >>>> at >>> > >> >> >>> > >>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler.compileGetValue( >>> > >> >> >>> > UnitCompiler.java:5253) >>> > >> >> >>> > >>>> at >>> > >> >> >>> > >>> >>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler.compileGet2(UnitCompiler. >>> > >> >> java:4792) >>> > >> >> >>> > >>>> at org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler.access$8300( >>> > >> >> >>> > >> UnitCompiler.java:212) >>> > >> >> >>> > >>>> at >>> > >> >> >>> > >>> >>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler$12.visitMethodInvocation( >>> > >> >> >>> > >> UnitCompiler.java:4097) >>> > >> >> >>> > >>>> at >>> > >> >> >>> > >>> >>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler$12.visitMethodInvocation( >>> > >> >> >>> > >> UnitCompiler.java:4070) >>> > >> >> >>> > >>>> at >>> > >> >> >>> >>> org.codehaus.janino.Java$MethodInvocation.accept(Java.java:4902) >>> > >> >> >>> > >>>> at org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler.compileGet( >>> > >> >> >>> > >> UnitCompiler.java:4070) >>> > >> >> >>> > >>>> at >>> > >> >> >>> > >>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler.compileGetValue( >>> > >> >> >>> > UnitCompiler.java:5253) >>> > >> >> >>> > >>>> at >>> > >> >> >>> > >>> >>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler.compileGet2(UnitCompiler. >>> > >> >> java:4696) >>> > >> >> >>> > >>>> at org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler.access$7800( >>> > >> >> >>> > >> UnitCompiler.java:212) >>> > >> >> >>> > >>>> at >>> > >> >> >>> > >>> >>> > >> >> >>> >>> > >> >>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler$12.visitCast(UnitCompiler.java:4092) >>> > >> >> >>> > >>>> at >>> > >> >> >>> > >>> >>> > >> >> >>> >>> > >> >>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler$12.visitCast(UnitCompiler.java:4070) >>> > >> >> >>> > >>>>
Re: JDK 8 syntax
>> > >> >> >>> > >>>> at org.codehaus.janino.Java$ >> > Lvalue.accept(Java.java:3977) >> > >> >> >>> > >>>> at org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler.compileGet( >> > >> >> >>> > >> UnitCompiler.java:4070) >> > >> >> >>> > >>>> at >> > >> >> >>> > >>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler.compileGetValue( >> > >> >> >>> > UnitCompiler.java:5253) >> > >> >> >>> > >>>> at >> > >> >> >>> > >>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompil >> er.compileGet2(UnitCompiler. >> > >> >> java:4792) >> > >> >> >>> > >>>> at org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler.access$8300( >> > >> >> >>> > >> UnitCompiler.java:212) >> > >> >> >>> > >>>> at >> > >> >> >>> > >>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompil >> er$12.visitMethodInvocation( >> > >> >> >>> > >> UnitCompiler.java:4097) >> > >> >> >>> > >>>> at >> > >> >> >>> > >>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompil >> er$12.visitMethodInvocation( >> > >> >> >>> > >> UnitCompiler.java:4070) >> > >> >> >>> > >>>> at >> > >> >> >>> org.codehaus.janino.Java$MethodInvocation.accept(Java.java: >> 4902) >> > >> >> >>> > >>>> at org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler.compileGet( >> > >> >> >>> > >> UnitCompiler.java:4070) >> > >> >> >>> > >>>> at >> > >> >> >>> > >>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler.compileGetValue( >> > >> >> >>> > UnitCompiler.java:5253) >> > >> >> >>> > >>>> at >> > >> >> >>> > >>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompil >> er.compileGet2(UnitCompiler. >> > >> >> java:4696) >> > >> >> >>> > >>>> at org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler.access$7800( >> > >> >> >>> > >> UnitCompiler.java:212) >> > >> >> >>> > >>>> at >> > >> >> >>> > >>> >> > >> >> >>> >> > >> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler$12.visitCast(UnitCompiler. >> java:4092) >> > >> >> >>> > >>>> at >> > >> >> >>> > >>> >> > >> >> >>> >> > >> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler$12.visitCast(UnitCompiler. >> java:4070) >> > >> >> >>> > >>>> at org.codehaus.janino.Java$Cast. >> accept(Java.java:4727) >> > >> >> >>> > >>>> at org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler.compileGet( >> > >> >> >>> > >> UnitCompiler.java:4070) >> > >> >> >>> > >>>> at >> > >> >> >>> > >>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompil >> er.compileGet2(UnitCompiler. >> > >> >> java:4732) >> > >> >> >>> > >>>> at org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler.access$7300( >> > >> >> >>> > >> UnitCompiler.java:212) >> > >> >> >>> > >>>> at >> > >> >> >>> > >>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler$12$1. >> > visitParenthesizedExpr >> > >> >> ession( >> > >> >> >>> > >> UnitCompiler.java:4083) >> > >> >> >>> > >>>> at >> > >> >> >>> > >>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler$12$1. >> > visitParenthesizedExpr >> > >> >> ession( >> > >> >> >>> > >> UnitCompiler.java:4074) >> > >> >> >>> > >>>> at >> > >> >> >>> > >>> org.codehaus.janino.Java$ParenthesizedExpression. >> > >> >> >>> > accept(Java.java:4753) >> > >> >> >>>
Re: JDK 8 syntax
gt; >>> > >>>> at > > >> >> >>> org.codehaus.janino.Java$MethodInvocation.accept(Java. > java:4902) > > >> >> >>> > >>>> at org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler.compileGet( > > >> >> >>> > >> UnitCompiler.java:4070) > > >> >> >>> > >>>> at > > >> >> >>> > >>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler.compileGetValue( > > >> >> >>> > UnitCompiler.java:5253) > > >> >> >>> > >>>> at > > >> >> >>> > >>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler.compileGet2( > UnitCompiler. > > >> >> java:4696) > > >> >> >>> > >>>> at org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler.access$7800( > > >> >> >>> > >> UnitCompiler.java:212) > > >> >> >>> > >>>> at > > >> >> >>> > >>> > > >> >> >>> > > >> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler$12.visitCast(UnitCompiler.java:4092) > > >> >> >>> > >>>> at > > >> >> >>> > >>> > > >> >> >>> > > >> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler$12.visitCast(UnitCompiler.java:4070) > > >> >> >>> > >>>> at org.codehaus.janino.Java$Cast. > accept(Java.java:4727) > > >> >> >>> > >>>> at org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler.compileGet( > > >> >> >>> > >> UnitCompiler.java:4070) > > >> >> >>> > >>>> at > > >> >> >>> > >>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler.compileGet2( > UnitCompiler. > > >> >> java:4732) > > >> >> >>> > >>>> at org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler.access$7300( > > >> >> >>> > >> UnitCompiler.java:212) > > >> >> >>> > >>>> at > > >> >> >>> > >>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler$12$1. > > visitParenthesizedExpr > > >> >> ession( > > >> >> >>> > >> UnitCompiler.java:4083) > > >> >> >>> > >>>> at > > >> >> >>> > >>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler$12$1. > > visitParenthesizedExpr > > >> >> ession( > > >> >> >>> > >> UnitCompiler.java:4074) > > >> >> >>> > >>>> at > > >> >> >>> > >>> org.codehaus.janino.Java$ParenthesizedExpression. > > >> >> >>> > accept(Java.java:4753) > > >> >> >>> > >>>> at > > >> >> >>> > >>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler$12.visitLvalue( > > >> >> >>> > UnitCompiler.java:4074) > > >> >> >>> > >>>> at > > >> >> >>> > >>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler$12.visitLvalue( > > >> >> >>> > UnitCompiler.java:4070) > > >> >> >>> > >>>> at org.codehaus.janino.Java$ > > Lvalue.accept(Java.java:3977) > > >> >> >>> > >>>> at org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler.compileGet( > > >> >> >>> > >> UnitCompiler.java:4070) > > >> >> >>> > >>>> at > > >> >> >>> > >>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler.compileGetValue( > > >> >> >>> > UnitCompiler.java:5253) > > >> >> >>> > >>>> at > > >> >> >>> > >>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler.compileContext2( > > >> >> >>> > UnitCompiler.java:4010) > > >> >> >>> > >>>> at org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler.access$6100( > > >> >> >>> > >> UnitCompiler.java:212) > > >> >> >>> > >>>> at > > >> >> >>> > >>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler$11$1.visitFieldAccess( > > >> >> UnitCompiler. > > >> >> >>> > >> java:3947) > > >> >> >>> > >>>> at > > >> >> >>> > >>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler$11$1.visitFieldAccess( > > >> >> UnitCompiler. > > >> >> >>> > >> java:3942) > > >> >> >>> > >>>> at org.codehaus.janino.Java$Field > > >> >> Access.accept(Java.java:4139) > > >> >> >>> > >>>> at > > >> >> >>> > >>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler$11.visitLvalue( > > >> >> >>> > UnitCompiler.java:3942) > > >> >> >>> > >>>> at > > >> >> >>> > >>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler$11.visitLvalue( > > >> >> >>> > UnitCompiler.java:3938) > > >> >> >>> > >>>> at org.codehaus.janino.Java$ > > Lvalue.accept(Java.java:3977) > > >> >> >>> > >>>> at > > >> >> >>> > >>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler.compileContext( > > >> >> >>> > UnitCompiler.java:3938) > > >> >> >>> > >>>> at > > >> >> >>> > >>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler.compileContext2( > > >> >> >>> > UnitCompiler.java:4047) > > >> >> >>> > >>>> at org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler.access$6200( > > >> >> >>> > >> UnitCompiler.java:212) > > >> >> >>> > >>>> at > > >> >> >>> > >>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler$11$1. > > visitFieldAccessExpres > > >> >> sion( > > >> >> >>> > >> UnitCompiler.java:3948) > > >> >> >>> > >>>> at > > >> >> >>> > >>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler$11$1. > > visitFieldAccessExpres > > >> >> sion( > > >> >> >>> > >> UnitCompiler.java:3942) > > >> >> >>> > >>>> at > > >> >> >>> > >>> > > >> >> >>> > > >> org.codehaus.janino.Java$FieldAccessExpression.accept(Java.java:4468) > > >> >> >>> > >>>> at > > >> >> >>> > >>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler$11.visitLvalue( > > >> >> >>> > UnitCompiler.java:3942) > > >> >> >>> > >>>> at > > >> >> >>> > >>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler$11.visitLvalue( > > >> >> >>> > UnitCompiler.java:3938) > > >> >> >>> > >>>> at org.codehaus.janino.Java$ > > Lvalue.accept(Java.java:3977) > > >> >> >>> > >>>> at > > >> >> >>> > >>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler.compileContext( > > >> >> >>> > UnitCompiler.java:3938) > > >> >> >>> > >>>> at > > >> >> >>> > >>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler.compileGetValue( > > >> >> >>> > UnitCompiler.java:5252) > > >> >> >>> > >>>> at > > >> >> >>> > >>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler.compileGet2( > UnitCompiler. > > >> >> java:4842) > > >> >> >>> > >>>> at org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler.access$8300( > > >> >> >>> > >> UnitCompiler.java:212) > > >> >> >>> > >>>> at > > >> >> >>> > >>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler$12. > visitMethodInvocation( > > >> >> >>> > >> UnitCompiler.java:4097) > > >> >> >>> > >>>> at > > >> >> >>> > >>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler$12. > visitMethodInvocation( > > >> >> >>> > >> UnitCompiler.java:4070) > > >> >> >>> > >>>> at > > >> >> >>> org.codehaus.janino.Java$MethodInvocation.accept(Java. > java:4902) > > >> >> >>> > >>>> at org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler.compileGet( > > >> >> >>> > >> UnitCompiler.java:4070) > > >> >> >>> > >>>> at > > >> >> >>> > >>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler.compileGetValue( > > >> >> >>> > UnitCompiler.java:5253) > > >> >> >>> > >>>> at org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler.compile2( > > >> >> >>> > UnitCompiler.java:2559) > > >> >> >>> > >>>> at org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler.access$2700( > > >> >> >>> > >> UnitCompiler.java:212) > > >> >> >>> > >>>> at > > >> >> >>> > >>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler$6. > > visitLocalVariableDeclara > > >> >> tionS > > >> >> >>> > >> tatement(UnitCompiler.java:1482) > > >> >> >>> > >>>> at > > >> >> >>> > >>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler$6. > > visitLocalVariableDeclara > > >> >> tionS > > >> >> >>> > >> tatement(UnitCompiler.java:1466) > > >> >> >>> > >>>> at > > >> >> >>> > >>> org.codehaus.janino.Java$LocalVariableDeclarationStatem > > >> >> >>> > >> ent.accept(Java.java:3351) > > >> >> >>> > >>>> at > > >> >> >>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler.compile( > UnitCompiler.java:1466) > > >> >> >>> > >>>> at org.cod (stack truncated) > > >> >> >>> > >>> > > >> >> >>> > >>> > > >> >> >>> > >>> 2018-04-09 23:10 GMT+02:00 Cade Markegard < > > >> >> cademarkeg...@gmail.com > > >> >> >>> >: > > >> >> >>> > >>> > > >> >> >>> > >>>> Awesome! > > >> >> >>> > >>>> > > >> >> >>> > >>>> On Mon, Apr 9, 2018 at 1:29 PM Enrico Olivelli < > > >> >> >>> eolive...@gmail.com> > > >> >> >>> > >>>> wrote: > > >> >> >>> > >>>> > > >> >> >>> > >>>>> Il lun 9 apr 2018, 22:20 Cade Markegard < > > >> >> cademarkeg...@gmail.com> > > >> >> >>> ha > > >> >> >>> > >>>>> scritto: > > >> >> >>> > >>>>> > > >> >> >>> > >>>>>> Not sure if this is related, but it seems like Janino > > >> doesn't > > >> >> >>> > support > > >> >> >>> > >>>>> Java8 > > >> >> >>> > >>>>>> lambdas under "Limitations" in > > >> http://janino-compiler.github > > >> >> . > > >> >> >>> > >>>> io/janino/ > > >> >> >>> > >>>>> > > >> >> >>> > >>>>> > > >> >> >>> > >>>>> > > >> >> >>> > >>>>> This should not be a problem, we are not generating > java > > >> >> sources > > >> >> >>> with > > >> >> >>> > >>>>> lambdas (maybe in future?). > > >> >> >>> > >>>>> I will be happy to do some trials with new Janino, but > I > > >> guess > > >> >> >>> that > > >> >> >>> > >> would > > >> >> >>> > >>>>> be the only way (or to drop Janino, but I think it will > > be > > >> >> >>> harder). I > > >> >> >>> > >>>> have > > >> >> >>> > >>>>> not much time these days. > > >> >> >>> > >>>>> > > >> >> >>> > >>>>> Anyhow I am testing my apps on jdk10 and Calcite is > > working > > >> >> like a > > >> >> >>> > >> charm > > >> >> >>> > >>>> ! > > >> >> >>> > >>>>> > > >> >> >>> > >>>>> Enrico > > >> >> >>> > >>>>> > > >> >> >>> > >>>>>> > > >> >> >>> > >>>>>> > > >> >> >>> > >>>>>>> On Mon, Apr 9, 2018 at 12:54 PM Julian Hyde < > > >> >> jh...@apache.org> > > >> >> >>> > >> wrote: > > >> >> >>> > >>>>>>> > > >> >> >>> > >>>>>>> I didn’t try. We’re on janino 2.7.6. The 2.x line > only > > >> goes > > >> >> up > > >> >> >>> to > > >> >> >>> > >>>>> 2.7.8. > > >> >> >>> > >>>>>>> I’m not eager to try upgrading to 3.x (latest release > > is > > >> >> 3.0.8) > > >> >> >>> > >>>>>> especially > > >> >> >>> > >>>>>>> as they don’t explicitly mention fixing a JDK 8 > issue. > > >> >> >>> > >>>>>>> > > >> >> >>> > >>>>>>> http://janino-compiler.github. > io/janino/changelog.html > > < > > >> >> >>> > >>>>>>> http://janino-compiler.github. > io/janino/changelog.html > > > > > >> >> >>> > >>>>>>> > > >> >> >>> > >>>>>>> > > >> >> >>> > >>>>>>>> On Apr 9, 2018, at 12:42 PM, Enrico Olivelli < > > >> >> >>> eolive...@gmail.com > > >> >> >>> > > > > >> >> >>> > >>>>>>> wrote: > > >> >> >>> > >>>>>>>> > > >> >> >>> > >>>>>>>> Il lun 9 apr 2018, 21:37 Julian Hyde < > > jh...@apache.org > > >> >> >>> > >> >> >>> > >>>>>>> jh...@apache.org>> ha scritto: > > >> >> >>> > >>>>>>>> > > >> >> >>> > >>>>>>>>> Don’t have the error stack, but janino could not > > >> compile > > >> >> >>> > generated > > >> >> >>> > >>>>>> code > > >> >> >>> > >>>>>>>>> because it said an “unwrap” method did not exist. > > >> >> >>> > >>>>>>>>> > > >> >> >>> > >>>>>>>>> There were no lambdas. I think perhaps that version > > of > > >> >> janino > > >> >> >>> > >>>> could > > >> >> >>> > >>>>>> not > > >> >> >>> > >>>>>>>>> fully understand the Calcite class files. > > >> >> >>> > >>>>>>>>> > > >> >> >>> > >>>>>>>>> To reproduce, change 2 lines in core/pom.xml and > run > > >> “mvn > > >> >> >>> test”. > > >> >> >>> > >>>>>>>>> > > >> >> >>> > >>>>>>>> > > >> >> >>> > >>>>>>>> Did you try to update to latest Janino? > > >> >> >>> > >>>>>>>> It seems to that we have an old version (2.7.6) > > >> >> >>> > >>>>>>>> > > >> >> >>> > >>>>>>>> Enrico > > >> >> >>> > >>>>>>>> > > >> >> >>> > >>>>>>>>> > > >> >> >>> > >>>>>>>>> Julian > > >> >> >>> > >>>>>>>>> > > >> >> >>> > >>>>>>>>> > > >> >> >>> > >>>>>>>>>> On Apr 9, 2018, at 12:15 PM, Enrico Olivelli < > > >> >> >>> > >>>> eolive...@gmail.com> > > >> >> >>> > >>>>>>>>> wrote: > > >> >> >>> > >>>>>>>>>> > > >> >> >>> > >>>>>>>>>> Il lun 9 apr 2018, 19:05 Julian Hyde < > > >> jh...@apache.org> > > >> >> ha > > >> >> >>> > >>>>> scritto: > > >> >> >>> > >>>>>>>>>> > > >> >> >>> > >>>>>>>>>>> Has anyone had any luck using JDK 8 syntax (e.g. > > “->” > > >> >> for > > >> >> >>> > >>>> lambdas) > > >> >> >>> > >>>>>> in > > >> >> >>> > >>>>>>>>>>> Calcite? > > >> >> >>> > >>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >> >>> > >>>>>>>>>>> In core/pom.xml I changed source=1.7 target=1.7 > to > > >> >> source=8 > > >> >> >>> > >>>>> target=8 > > >> >> >>> > >>>>>>> and > > >> >> >>> > >>>>>>>>>>> it allowed the syntax but it seemed to break any > > >> tests > > >> >> that > > >> >> >>> > >>>> relied > > >> >> >>> > >>>>>> on > > >> >> >>> > >>>>>>>>>>> janino. > > >> >> >>> > >>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >> >>> > >>>>>>>>>> > > >> >> >>> > >>>>>>>>>> Julian, > > >> >> >>> > >>>>>>>>>> Could you please share a stacktrace of your error? > > >> >> >>> > >>>>>>>>>> As far as I know using lambdas is not only a > matter > > of > > >> >> >>> syntactic > > >> >> >>> > >>>>>> sugar > > >> >> >>> > >>>>>>>>> but > > >> >> >>> > >>>>>>>>>> they are more efficient than simple anonymous > > classes. > > >> >> >>> > >>>>>>>>>> > > >> >> >>> > >>>>>>>>>> Cheers > > >> >> >>> > >>>>>>>>>> Enrico > > >> >> >>> > >>>>>>>>>> > > >> >> >>> > >>>>>>>>>> > > >> >> >>> > >>>>>>>>>>> Related: https://issues.apache.org/jira > > >> >> /browse/CALCITE-2027 > > >> >> >>> < > > >> >> >>> > >>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/ > jira/browse/CALCITE-2027 > > > > > >> >> >>> > >>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >> >>> > >>>>>>>>>>> Julian > > >> >> >>> > >>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >> >>> > >>>>>>>>>>> -- > > >> >> >>> > >>>>>>>>>> > > >> >> >>> > >>>>>>>>>> > > >> >> >>> > >>>>>>>>>> -- Enrico Olivelli > > >> >> >>> > >>>>>>>>> > > >> >> >>> > >>>>>>>>> -- > > >> >> >>> > >>>>>>>> > > >> >> >>> > >>>>>>>> > > >> >> >>> > >>>>>>>> -- Enrico Olivelli > > >> >> >>> > >>>>>>> > > >> >> >>> > >>>>>>> > > >> >> >>> > >>>>>> > > >> >> >>> > >>>>> -- > > >> >> >>> > >>>>> > > >> >> >>> > >>>>> > > >> >> >>> > >>>>> -- Enrico Olivelli > > >> >> >>> > >>>>> > > >> >> >>> > >>>> > > >> >> >>> > >> > > >> >> >>> > > > >> >> >>> > > >> >> >> -- > > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> -- Enrico Olivelli > > >> >> >> > > >> >> > -- > > >> >> > > > >> >> > > > >> >> > -- Enrico Olivelli > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > -- > > > > > > > > > -- Enrico Olivelli > > > > > -- > > > > > > -- Enrico Olivelli > > >
Re: JDK 8 syntax
us.janino.UnitCompiler.access$7300( > >> >> >>> > >> UnitCompiler.java:212) > >> >> >>> > >>>> at > >> >> >>> > >>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler$12$1. > visitParenthesizedExpr > >> >> ession( > >> >> >>> > >> UnitCompiler.java:4083) > >> >> >>> > >>>> at > >> >> >>> > >>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler$12$1. > visitParenthesizedExpr > >> >> ession( > >> >> >>> > >> UnitCompiler.java:4074) > >> >> >>> > >>>> at > >> >> >>> > >>> org.codehaus.janino.Java$ParenthesizedExpression. > >> >> >>> > accept(Java.java:4753) > >> >> >>> > >>>> at > >> >> >>> > >>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler$12.visitLvalue( > >> >> >>> > UnitCompiler.java:4074) > >> >> >>> > >>>> at > >> >> >>> > >>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler$12.visitLvalue( > >> >> >>> > UnitCompiler.java:4070) > >> >> >>> > >>>> at org.codehaus.janino.Java$ > Lvalue.accept(Java.java:3977) > >> >> >>> > >>>> at org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler.compileGet( > >> >> >>> > >> UnitCompiler.java:4070) > >> >> >>> > >>>> at > >> >> >>> > >>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler.compileGetValue( > >> >> >>> > UnitCompiler.java:5253) > >> >> >>> > >>>> at > >> >> >>> > >>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler.compileContext2( > >> >> >>> > UnitCompiler.java:4010) > >> >> >>> > >>>> at org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler.access$6100( > >> >> >>> > >> UnitCompiler.java:212) > >> >> >>> > >>>> at > >> >> >>> > >>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler$11$1.visitFieldAccess( > >> >> UnitCompiler. > >> >> >>> > >> java:3947) > >> >> >>> > >>>> at > >> >> >>> > >>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler$11$1.visitFieldAccess( > >> >> UnitCompiler. > >> >> >>> > >> java:3942) > >> >> >>> > >>>> at org.codehaus.janino.Java$Field > >> >> Access.accept(Java.java:4139) > >> >> >>> > >>>> at > >> >> >>> > >>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler$11.visitLvalue( > >> >> >>> > UnitCompiler.java:3942) > >> >> >>> > >>>> at > >> >> >>> > >>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler$11.visitLvalue( > >> >> >>> > UnitCompiler.java:3938) > >> >> >>> > >>>> at org.codehaus.janino.Java$ > Lvalue.accept(Java.java:3977) > >> >> >>> > >>>> at > >> >> >>> > >>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler.compileContext( > >> >> >>> > UnitCompiler.java:3938) > >> >> >>> > >>>> at > >> >> >>> > >>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler.compileContext2( > >> >> >>> > UnitCompiler.java:4047) > >> >> >>> > >>>> at org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler.access$6200( > >> >> >>> > >> UnitCompiler.java:212) > >> >> >>> > >>>> at > >> >> >>> > >>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler$11$1. > visitFieldAccessExpres > >> >> sion( > >> >> >>> > >> UnitCompiler.java:3948) > >> >> >>> > >>>> at > >> >> >>> > >>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler$11$1. > visitFieldAccessExpres > >> >> sion( > >> >> >>> > >> UnitCompiler.java:3942) > >> >> >>> > >>>> at > >> >> >>> > >>> > >> >> >>> > >> org.codehaus.janino.Java$FieldAccessExpression.accept(Java.java:4468) > >> >> >>> > >>>> at > >> >> >>> > >>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler$11.visitLvalue( > >> >> >>> > UnitCompiler.java:3942) > >> >> >>> > >>>> at > >> >> >>> > >>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler$11.visitLvalue( > >> >> >>> > UnitCompiler.java:3938) > >> >> >>> > >>>> at org.codehaus.janino.Java$ > Lvalue.accept(Java.java:3977) > >> >> >>> > >>>> at > >> >> >>> > >>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler.compileContext( > >> >> >>> > UnitCompiler.java:3938) > >> >> >>> > >>>> at > >> >> >>> > >>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler.compileGetValue( > >> >> >>> > UnitCompiler.java:5252) > >> >> >>> > >>>> at > >> >> >>> > >>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler.compileGet2(UnitCompiler. > >> >> java:4842) > >> >> >>> > >>>> at org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler.access$8300( > >> >> >>> > >> UnitCompiler.java:212) > >> >> >>> > >>>> at > >> >> >>> > >>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler$12.visitMethodInvocation( > >> >> >>> > >> UnitCompiler.java:4097) > >> >> >>> > >>>> at > >> >> >>> > >>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler$12.visitMethodInvocation( > >> >> >>> > >> UnitCompiler.java:4070) > >> >> >>> > >>>> at > >> >> >>> org.codehaus.janino.Java$MethodInvocation.accept(Java.java:4902) > >> >> >>> > >>>> at org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler.compileGet( > >> >> >>> > >> UnitCompiler.java:4070) > >> >> >>> > >>>> at > >> >> >>> > >>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler.compileGetValue( > >> >> >>> > UnitCompiler.java:5253) > >> >> >>> > >>>> at org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler.compile2( > >> >> >>> > UnitCompiler.java:2559) > >> >> >>> > >>>> at org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler.access$2700( > >> >> >>> > >> UnitCompiler.java:212) > >> >> >>> > >>>> at > >> >> >>> > >>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler$6. > visitLocalVariableDeclara > >> >> tionS > >> >> >>> > >> tatement(UnitCompiler.java:1482) > >> >> >>> > >>>> at > >> >> >>> > >>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler$6. > visitLocalVariableDeclara > >> >> tionS > >> >> >>> > >> tatement(UnitCompiler.java:1466) > >> >> >>> > >>>> at > >> >> >>> > >>> org.codehaus.janino.Java$LocalVariableDeclarationStatem > >> >> >>> > >> ent.accept(Java.java:3351) > >> >> >>> > >>>> at > >> >> >>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler.compile(UnitCompiler.java:1466) > >> >> >>> > >>>> at org.cod (stack truncated) > >> >> >>> > >>> > >> >> >>> > >>> > >> >> >>> > >>> 2018-04-09 23:10 GMT+02:00 Cade Markegard < > >> >> cademarkeg...@gmail.com > >> >> >>> >: > >> >> >>> > >>> > >> >> >>> > >>>> Awesome! > >> >> >>> > >>>> > >> >> >>> > >>>> On Mon, Apr 9, 2018 at 1:29 PM Enrico Olivelli < > >> >> >>> eolive...@gmail.com> > >> >> >>> > >>>> wrote: > >> >> >>> > >>>> > >> >> >>> > >>>>> Il lun 9 apr 2018, 22:20 Cade Markegard < > >> >> cademarkeg...@gmail.com> > >> >> >>> ha > >> >> >>> > >>>>> scritto: > >> >> >>> > >>>>> > >> >> >>> > >>>>>> Not sure if this is related, but it seems like Janino > >> doesn't > >> >> >>> > support > >> >> >>> > >>>>> Java8 > >> >> >>> > >>>>>> lambdas under "Limitations" in > >> http://janino-compiler.github > >> >> . > >> >> >>> > >>>> io/janino/ > >> >> >>> > >>>>> > >> >> >>> > >>>>> > >> >> >>> > >>>>> > >> >> >>> > >>>>> This should not be a problem, we are not generating java > >> >> sources > >> >> >>> with > >> >> >>> > >>>>> lambdas (maybe in future?). > >> >> >>> > >>>>> I will be happy to do some trials with new Janino, but I > >> guess > >> >> >>> that > >> >> >>> > >> would > >> >> >>> > >>>>> be the only way (or to drop Janino, but I think it will > be > >> >> >>> harder). I > >> >> >>> > >>>> have > >> >> >>> > >>>>> not much time these days. > >> >> >>> > >>>>> > >> >> >>> > >>>>> Anyhow I am testing my apps on jdk10 and Calcite is > working > >> >> like a > >> >> >>> > >> charm > >> >> >>> > >>>> ! > >> >> >>> > >>>>> > >> >> >>> > >>>>> Enrico > >> >> >>> > >>>>> > >> >> >>> > >>>>>> > >> >> >>> > >>>>>> > >> >> >>> > >>>>>>> On Mon, Apr 9, 2018 at 12:54 PM Julian Hyde < > >> >> jh...@apache.org> > >> >> >>> > >> wrote: > >> >> >>> > >>>>>>> > >> >> >>> > >>>>>>> I didn’t try. We’re on janino 2.7.6. The 2.x line only > >> goes > >> >> up > >> >> >>> to > >> >> >>> > >>>>> 2.7.8. > >> >> >>> > >>>>>>> I’m not eager to try upgrading to 3.x (latest release > is > >> >> 3.0.8) > >> >> >>> > >>>>>> especially > >> >> >>> > >>>>>>> as they don’t explicitly mention fixing a JDK 8 issue. > >> >> >>> > >>>>>>> > >> >> >>> > >>>>>>> http://janino-compiler.github.io/janino/changelog.html > < > >> >> >>> > >>>>>>> http://janino-compiler.github.io/janino/changelog.html > > > >> >> >>> > >>>>>>> > >> >> >>> > >>>>>>> > >> >> >>> > >>>>>>>> On Apr 9, 2018, at 12:42 PM, Enrico Olivelli < > >> >> >>> eolive...@gmail.com > >> >> >>> > > > >> >> >>> > >>>>>>> wrote: > >> >> >>> > >>>>>>>> > >> >> >>> > >>>>>>>> Il lun 9 apr 2018, 21:37 Julian Hyde < > jh...@apache.org > >> >> >>> >> >> >>> > >>>>>>> jh...@apache.org>> ha scritto: > >> >> >>> > >>>>>>>> > >> >> >>> > >>>>>>>>> Don’t have the error stack, but janino could not > >> compile > >> >> >>> > generated > >> >> >>> > >>>>>> code > >> >> >>> > >>>>>>>>> because it said an “unwrap” method did not exist. > >> >> >>> > >>>>>>>>> > >> >> >>> > >>>>>>>>> There were no lambdas. I think perhaps that version > of > >> >> janino > >> >> >>> > >>>> could > >> >> >>> > >>>>>> not > >> >> >>> > >>>>>>>>> fully understand the Calcite class files. > >> >> >>> > >>>>>>>>> > >> >> >>> > >>>>>>>>> To reproduce, change 2 lines in core/pom.xml and run > >> “mvn > >> >> >>> test”. > >> >> >>> > >>>>>>>>> > >> >> >>> > >>>>>>>> > >> >> >>> > >>>>>>>> Did you try to update to latest Janino? > >> >> >>> > >>>>>>>> It seems to that we have an old version (2.7.6) > >> >> >>> > >>>>>>>> > >> >> >>> > >>>>>>>> Enrico > >> >> >>> > >>>>>>>> > >> >> >>> > >>>>>>>>> > >> >> >>> > >>>>>>>>> Julian > >> >> >>> > >>>>>>>>> > >> >> >>> > >>>>>>>>> > >> >> >>> > >>>>>>>>>> On Apr 9, 2018, at 12:15 PM, Enrico Olivelli < > >> >> >>> > >>>> eolive...@gmail.com> > >> >> >>> > >>>>>>>>> wrote: > >> >> >>> > >>>>>>>>>> > >> >> >>> > >>>>>>>>>> Il lun 9 apr 2018, 19:05 Julian Hyde < > >> jh...@apache.org> > >> >> ha > >> >> >>> > >>>>> scritto: > >> >> >>> > >>>>>>>>>> > >> >> >>> > >>>>>>>>>>> Has anyone had any luck using JDK 8 syntax (e.g. > “->” > >> >> for > >> >> >>> > >>>> lambdas) > >> >> >>> > >>>>>> in > >> >> >>> > >>>>>>>>>>> Calcite? > >> >> >>> > >>>>>>>>>>> > >> >> >>> > >>>>>>>>>>> In core/pom.xml I changed source=1.7 target=1.7 to > >> >> source=8 > >> >> >>> > >>>>> target=8 > >> >> >>> > >>>>>>> and > >> >> >>> > >>>>>>>>>>> it allowed the syntax but it seemed to break any > >> tests > >> >> that > >> >> >>> > >>>> relied > >> >> >>> > >>>>>> on > >> >> >>> > >>>>>>>>>>> janino. > >> >> >>> > >>>>>>>>>>> > >> >> >>> > >>>>>>>>>> > >> >> >>> > >>>>>>>>>> Julian, > >> >> >>> > >>>>>>>>>> Could you please share a stacktrace of your error? > >> >> >>> > >>>>>>>>>> As far as I know using lambdas is not only a matter > of > >> >> >>> syntactic > >> >> >>> > >>>>>> sugar > >> >> >>> > >>>>>>>>> but > >> >> >>> > >>>>>>>>>> they are more efficient than simple anonymous > classes. > >> >> >>> > >>>>>>>>>> > >> >> >>> > >>>>>>>>>> Cheers > >> >> >>> > >>>>>>>>>> Enrico > >> >> >>> > >>>>>>>>>> > >> >> >>> > >>>>>>>>>> > >> >> >>> > >>>>>>>>>>> Related: https://issues.apache.org/jira > >> >> /browse/CALCITE-2027 > >> >> >>> < > >> >> >>> > >>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2027 > > > >> >> >>> > >>>>>>>>>>> > >> >> >>> > >>>>>>>>>>> Julian > >> >> >>> > >>>>>>>>>>> > >> >> >>> > >>>>>>>>>>> -- > >> >> >>> > >>>>>>>>>> > >> >> >>> > >>>>>>>>>> > >> >> >>> > >>>>>>>>>> -- Enrico Olivelli > >> >> >>> > >>>>>>>>> > >> >> >>> > >>>>>>>>> -- > >> >> >>> > >>>>>>>> > >> >> >>> > >>>>>>>> > >> >> >>> > >>>>>>>> -- Enrico Olivelli > >> >> >>> > >>>>>>> > >> >> >>> > >>>>>>> > >> >> >>> > >>>>>> > >> >> >>> > >>>>> -- > >> >> >>> > >>>>> > >> >> >>> > >>>>> > >> >> >>> > >>>>> -- Enrico Olivelli > >> >> >>> > >>>>> > >> >> >>> > >>>> > >> >> >>> > >> > >> >> >>> > > >> >> >>> > >> >> >> -- > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> -- Enrico Olivelli > >> >> >> > >> >> > -- > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > -- Enrico Olivelli > >> >> > >> > > >> > > >> > > -- > > > > > > -- Enrico Olivelli > > > -- > > > -- Enrico Olivelli >
Re: JDK 8 syntax
gt;> > >> UnitCompiler.java:4070) >> >> >>> > >>>> at >> >> >>> > >>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler.compileGetValue( >> >> >>> > UnitCompiler.java:5253) >> >> >>> > >>>> at >> >> >>> > >>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler.compileGet2(UnitCompiler. >> >> java:4792) >> >> >>> > >>>> at org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler.access$8300( >> >> >>> > >> UnitCompiler.java:212) >> >> >>> > >>>> at >> >> >>> > >>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler$12.visitMethodInvocation( >> >> >>> > >> UnitCompiler.java:4097) >> >> >>> > >>>> at >> >> >>> > >>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler$12.visitMethodInvocation( >> >> >>> > >> UnitCompiler.java:4070) >> >> >>> > >>>> at >> >> >>> org.codehaus.janino.Java$MethodInvocation.accept(Java.java:4902) >> >> >>> > >>>> at org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler.compileGet( >> >> >>> > >> UnitCompiler.java:4070) >> >> >>> > >>>> at >> >> >>> > >>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler.compileGetValue( >> >> >>> > UnitCompiler.java:5253) >> >> >>> > >>>> at >> >> >>> > >>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler.compileGet2(UnitCompiler. >> >> java:4696) >> >> >>> > >>>> at org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler.access$7800( >> >> >>> > >> UnitCompiler.java:212) >> >> >>> > >>>> at >> >> >>> > >>> >> >> >>> >> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler$12.visitCast(UnitCompiler.java:4092) >> >> >>> > >>>> at >> >> >>> > >>> >> >> >>> >> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler$12.visitCast(UnitCompiler.java:4070) >> >> >>> > >>>> at org.codehaus.janino.Java$Cast.accept(Java.java:4727) >> >> >>> > >>>> at org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler.compileGet( >> >> >>> > >> UnitCompiler.java:4070) >> >> >>> > >>>> at >> >> >>> > >>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler.compileGet2(UnitCompiler. >> >> java:4732) >> >> >>> > >>>> at org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler.access$7300( >> >> >>> > >> UnitCompiler.java:212) >> >> >>> > >>>> at >> >> >>> > >>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler$12$1.visitParenthesizedExpr >> >> ession( >> >> >>> > >> UnitCompiler.java:4083) >> >> >>> > >>>> at >> >> >>> > >>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler$12$1.visitParenthesizedExpr >> >> ession( >> >> >>> > >> UnitCompiler.java:4074) >> >> >>> > >>>> at >> >> >>> > >>> org.codehaus.janino.Java$ParenthesizedExpression. >> >> >>> > accept(Java.java:4753) >> >> >>> > >>>> at >> >> >>> > >>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler$12.visitLvalue( >> >> >>> > UnitCompiler.java:4074) >> >> >>> > >>>> at >> >> >>> > >>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler$12.visitLvalue( >> >> >>> > UnitCompiler.java:4070) >> >> >>> > >>>> at org.codehaus.janino.Java$Lvalue.accept(Java.java:3977) >> >> >>> > >>>> at org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler.compileGet( >> >> >>> > >> UnitCompiler.java:4070) >> >> >>> > >>>> at >> >> >>> > >>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler.compileGetValue( >> >> >>> > UnitCompiler.java:5253) >> >> >>> > >>>> at >> >> >>> > >>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler.compileContext2( >> >> >>> > UnitCompiler.java:4010) >> >> >>> > &
Re: JDK 8 syntax
us.janino.UnitCompiler.compileGetValue( > >> >>> > UnitCompiler.java:5253) > >> >>> > >>>> at > >> >>> > >>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler.compileGet2(UnitCompiler. > >> java:4696) > >> >>> > >>>> at org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler.access$7800( > >> >>> > >> UnitCompiler.java:212) > >> >>> > >>>> at > >> >>> > >>> > >> >>> > org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler$12.visitCast(UnitCompiler.java:4092) > >> >>> > >>>> at > >> >>> > >>> > >> >>> > org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler$12.visitCast(UnitCompiler.java:4070) > >> >>> > >>>> at org.codehaus.janino.Java$Cast.accept(Java.java:4727) > >> >>> > >>>> at org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler.compileGet( > >> >>> > >> UnitCompiler.java:4070) > >> >>> > >>>> at > >> >>> > >>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler.compileGet2(UnitCompiler. > >> java:4732) > >> >>> > >>>> at org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler.access$7300( > >> >>> > >> UnitCompiler.java:212) > >> >>> > >>>> at > >> >>> > >>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler$12$1.visitParenthesizedExpr > >> ession( > >> >>> > >> UnitCompiler.java:4083) > >> >>> > >>>> at > >> >>> > >>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler$12$1.visitParenthesizedExpr > >> ession( > >> >>> > >> UnitCompiler.java:4074) > >> >>> > >>>> at > >> >>> > >>> org.codehaus.janino.Java$ParenthesizedExpression. > >> >>> > accept(Java.java:4753) > >> >>> > >>>> at > >> >>> > >>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler$12.visitLvalue( > >> >>> > UnitCompiler.java:4074) > >> >>> > >>>> at > >> >>> > >>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler$12.visitLvalue( > >> >>> > UnitCompiler.java:4070) > >> >>> > >>>> at org.codehaus.janino.Java$Lvalue.accept(Java.java:3977) > >> >>> > >>>> at org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler.compileGet( > >> >>> > >> UnitCompiler.java:4070) > >> >>> > >>>> at > >> >>> > >>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler.compileGetValue( > >> >>> > UnitCompiler.java:5253) > >> >>> > >>>> at > >> >>> > >>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler.compileContext2( > >> >>> > UnitCompiler.java:4010) > >> >>> > >>>> at org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler.access$6100( > >> >>> > >> UnitCompiler.java:212) > >> >>> > >>>> at > >> >>> > >>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler$11$1.visitFieldAccess( > >> UnitCompiler. > >> >>> > >> java:3947) > >> >>> > >>>> at > >> >>> > >>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler$11$1.visitFieldAccess( > >> UnitCompiler. > >> >>> > >> java:3942) > >> >>> > >>>> at org.codehaus.janino.Java$Field > >> Access.accept(Java.java:4139) > >> >>> > >>>> at > >> >>> > >>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler$11.visitLvalue( > >> >>> > UnitCompiler.java:3942) > >> >>> > >>>> at > >> >>> > >>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler$11.visitLvalue( > >> >>> > UnitCompiler.java:3938) > >> >>> > >>>> at org.codehaus.janino.Java$Lvalue.accept(Java.java:3977) > >> >>> > >>>> at > >> >>> > >>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler.compileContext( > >> >>> > UnitCompiler.java:3938) > >> >>> > >>>> at > >> >>> > >>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler.compileContext2( > >> >>> > UnitCompiler.java:4047) > >> >>> > >>>>
Re: JDK 8 syntax
odehaus.janino.UnitCompiler$12$1.visitParenthesizedExpr >> ession( >> >>> > >> UnitCompiler.java:4083) >> >>> > >>>> at >> >>> > >>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler$12$1.visitParenthesizedExpr >> ession( >> >>> > >> UnitCompiler.java:4074) >> >>> > >>>> at >> >>> > >>> org.codehaus.janino.Java$ParenthesizedExpression. >> >>> > accept(Java.java:4753) >> >>> > >>>> at >> >>> > >>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler$12.visitLvalue( >> >>> > UnitCompiler.java:4074) >> >>> > >>>> at >> >>> > >>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler$12.visitLvalue( >> >>> > UnitCompiler.java:4070) >> >>> > >>>> at org.codehaus.janino.Java$Lvalue.accept(Java.java:3977) >> >>> > >>>> at org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler.compileGet( >> >>> > >> UnitCompiler.java:4070) >> >>> > >>>> at >> >>> > >>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler.compileGetValue( >> >>> > UnitCompiler.java:5253) >> >>> > >>>> at >> >>> > >>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler.compileContext2( >> >>> > UnitCompiler.java:4010) >> >>> > >>>> at org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler.access$6100( >> >>> > >> UnitCompiler.java:212) >> >>> > >>>> at >> >>> > >>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler$11$1.visitFieldAccess( >> UnitCompiler. >> >>> > >> java:3947) >> >>> > >>>> at >> >>> > >>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler$11$1.visitFieldAccess( >> UnitCompiler. >> >>> > >> java:3942) >> >>> > >>>> at org.codehaus.janino.Java$Field >> Access.accept(Java.java:4139) >> >>> > >>>> at >> >>> > >>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler$11.visitLvalue( >> >>> > UnitCompiler.java:3942) >> >>> > >>>> at >> >>> > >>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler$11.visitLvalue( >> >>> > UnitCompiler.java:3938) >> >>> > >>>> at org.codehaus.janino.Java$Lvalue.accept(Java.java:3977) >> >>> > >>>> at >> >>> > >>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler.compileContext( >> >>> > UnitCompiler.java:3938) >> >>> > >>>> at >> >>> > >>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler.compileContext2( >> >>> > UnitCompiler.java:4047) >> >>> > >>>> at org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler.access$6200( >> >>> > >> UnitCompiler.java:212) >> >>> > >>>> at >> >>> > >>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler$11$1.visitFieldAccessExpres >> sion( >> >>> > >> UnitCompiler.java:3948) >> >>> > >>>> at >> >>> > >>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler$11$1.visitFieldAccessExpres >> sion( >> >>> > >> UnitCompiler.java:3942) >> >>> > >>>> at >> >>> > >>> >> >>> org.codehaus.janino.Java$FieldAccessExpression.accept(Java.java:4468) >> >>> > >>>> at >> >>> > >>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler$11.visitLvalue( >> >>> > UnitCompiler.java:3942) >> >>> > >>>> at >> >>> > >>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler$11.visitLvalue( >> >>> > UnitCompiler.java:3938) >> >>> > >>>> at org.codehaus.janino.Java$Lvalue.accept(Java.java:3977) >> >>> > >>>> at >> >>> > >>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler.compileContext( >> >>> > UnitCompiler.java:3938) >> >>> > >>>> at >> >>> > >>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler.compileGetValue( >> >>> > UnitCompiler.java:5252) >> >>> > >>>> at >> >>> > >>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler.compileGet2(UnitCompiler. >> java:4842) >> >>> > >>>> at org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler.access$8300( >> >>> > >> UnitCompiler.java:212) >> >>> > >>>> at >> >>> > >>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler$12.visitMethodInvocation( >> >>> > >> UnitCompiler.java:4097) >> >>> > >>>> at >> >>> > >>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler$12.visitMethodInvocation( >> >>> > >> UnitCompiler.java:4070) >> >>> > >>>> at >> >>> org.codehaus.janino.Java$MethodInvocation.accept(Java.java:4902) >> >>> > >>>> at org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler.compileGet( >> >>> > >> UnitCompiler.java:4070) >> >>> > >>>> at >> >>> > >>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler.compileGetValue( >> >>> > UnitCompiler.java:5253) >> >>> > >>>> at org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler.compile2( >> >>> > UnitCompiler.java:2559) >> >>> > >>>> at org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler.access$2700( >> >>> > >> UnitCompiler.java:212) >> >>> > >>>> at >> >>> > >>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler$6.visitLocalVariableDeclara >> tionS >> >>> > >> tatement(UnitCompiler.java:1482) >> >>> > >>>> at >> >>> > >>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler$6.visitLocalVariableDeclara >> tionS >> >>> > >> tatement(UnitCompiler.java:1466) >> >>> > >>>> at >> >>> > >>> org.codehaus.janino.Java$LocalVariableDeclarationStatem >> >>> > >> ent.accept(Java.java:3351) >> >>> > >>>> at >> >>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler.compile(UnitCompiler.java:1466) >> >>> > >>>> at org.cod (stack truncated) >> >>> > >>> >> >>> > >>> >> >>> > >>> 2018-04-09 23:10 GMT+02:00 Cade Markegard < >> cademarkeg...@gmail.com >> >>> >: >> >>> > >>> >> >>> > >>>> Awesome! >> >>> > >>>> >> >>> > >>>> On Mon, Apr 9, 2018 at 1:29 PM Enrico Olivelli < >> >>> eolive...@gmail.com> >> >>> > >>>> wrote: >> >>> > >>>> >> >>> > >>>>> Il lun 9 apr 2018, 22:20 Cade Markegard < >> cademarkeg...@gmail.com> >> >>> ha >> >>> > >>>>> scritto: >> >>> > >>>>> >> >>> > >>>>>> Not sure if this is related, but it seems like Janino doesn't >> >>> > support >> >>> > >>>>> Java8 >> >>> > >>>>>> lambdas under "Limitations" in http://janino-compiler.github >> . >> >>> > >>>> io/janino/ >> >>> > >>>>> >> >>> > >>>>> >> >>> > >>>>> >> >>> > >>>>> This should not be a problem, we are not generating java >> sources >> >>> with >> >>> > >>>>> lambdas (maybe in future?). >> >>> > >>>>> I will be happy to do some trials with new Janino, but I guess >> >>> that >> >>> > >> would >> >>> > >>>>> be the only way (or to drop Janino, but I think it will be >> >>> harder). I >> >>> > >>>> have >> >>> > >>>>> not much time these days. >> >>> > >>>>> >> >>> > >>>>> Anyhow I am testing my apps on jdk10 and Calcite is working >> like a >> >>> > >> charm >> >>> > >>>> ! >> >>> > >>>>> >> >>> > >>>>> Enrico >> >>> > >>>>> >> >>> > >>>>>> >> >>> > >>>>>> >> >>> > >>>>>>> On Mon, Apr 9, 2018 at 12:54 PM Julian Hyde < >> jh...@apache.org> >> >>> > >> wrote: >> >>> > >>>>>>> >> >>> > >>>>>>> I didn’t try. We’re on janino 2.7.6. The 2.x line only goes >> up >> >>> to >> >>> > >>>>> 2.7.8. >> >>> > >>>>>>> I’m not eager to try upgrading to 3.x (latest release is >> 3.0.8) >> >>> > >>>>>> especially >> >>> > >>>>>>> as they don’t explicitly mention fixing a JDK 8 issue. >> >>> > >>>>>>> >> >>> > >>>>>>> http://janino-compiler.github.io/janino/changelog.html < >> >>> > >>>>>>> http://janino-compiler.github.io/janino/changelog.html> >> >>> > >>>>>>> >> >>> > >>>>>>> >> >>> > >>>>>>>> On Apr 9, 2018, at 12:42 PM, Enrico Olivelli < >> >>> eolive...@gmail.com >> >>> > > >> >>> > >>>>>>> wrote: >> >>> > >>>>>>>> >> >>> > >>>>>>>> Il lun 9 apr 2018, 21:37 Julian Hyde <jh...@apache.org >> >>> > >>> > >>>>>>> jh...@apache.org>> ha scritto: >> >>> > >>>>>>>> >> >>> > >>>>>>>>> Don’t have the error stack, but janino could not compile >> >>> > generated >> >>> > >>>>>> code >> >>> > >>>>>>>>> because it said an “unwrap” method did not exist. >> >>> > >>>>>>>>> >> >>> > >>>>>>>>> There were no lambdas. I think perhaps that version of >> janino >> >>> > >>>> could >> >>> > >>>>>> not >> >>> > >>>>>>>>> fully understand the Calcite class files. >> >>> > >>>>>>>>> >> >>> > >>>>>>>>> To reproduce, change 2 lines in core/pom.xml and run “mvn >> >>> test”. >> >>> > >>>>>>>>> >> >>> > >>>>>>>> >> >>> > >>>>>>>> Did you try to update to latest Janino? >> >>> > >>>>>>>> It seems to that we have an old version (2.7.6) >> >>> > >>>>>>>> >> >>> > >>>>>>>> Enrico >> >>> > >>>>>>>> >> >>> > >>>>>>>>> >> >>> > >>>>>>>>> Julian >> >>> > >>>>>>>>> >> >>> > >>>>>>>>> >> >>> > >>>>>>>>>> On Apr 9, 2018, at 12:15 PM, Enrico Olivelli < >> >>> > >>>> eolive...@gmail.com> >> >>> > >>>>>>>>> wrote: >> >>> > >>>>>>>>>> >> >>> > >>>>>>>>>> Il lun 9 apr 2018, 19:05 Julian Hyde <jh...@apache.org> >> ha >> >>> > >>>>> scritto: >> >>> > >>>>>>>>>> >> >>> > >>>>>>>>>>> Has anyone had any luck using JDK 8 syntax (e.g. “->” >> for >> >>> > >>>> lambdas) >> >>> > >>>>>> in >> >>> > >>>>>>>>>>> Calcite? >> >>> > >>>>>>>>>>> >> >>> > >>>>>>>>>>> In core/pom.xml I changed source=1.7 target=1.7 to >> source=8 >> >>> > >>>>> target=8 >> >>> > >>>>>>> and >> >>> > >>>>>>>>>>> it allowed the syntax but it seemed to break any tests >> that >> >>> > >>>> relied >> >>> > >>>>>> on >> >>> > >>>>>>>>>>> janino. >> >>> > >>>>>>>>>>> >> >>> > >>>>>>>>>> >> >>> > >>>>>>>>>> Julian, >> >>> > >>>>>>>>>> Could you please share a stacktrace of your error? >> >>> > >>>>>>>>>> As far as I know using lambdas is not only a matter of >> >>> syntactic >> >>> > >>>>>> sugar >> >>> > >>>>>>>>> but >> >>> > >>>>>>>>>> they are more efficient than simple anonymous classes. >> >>> > >>>>>>>>>> >> >>> > >>>>>>>>>> Cheers >> >>> > >>>>>>>>>> Enrico >> >>> > >>>>>>>>>> >> >>> > >>>>>>>>>> >> >>> > >>>>>>>>>>> Related: https://issues.apache.org/jira >> /browse/CALCITE-2027 >> >>> < >> >>> > >>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2027> >> >>> > >>>>>>>>>>> >> >>> > >>>>>>>>>>> Julian >> >>> > >>>>>>>>>>> >> >>> > >>>>>>>>>>> -- >> >>> > >>>>>>>>>> >> >>> > >>>>>>>>>> >> >>> > >>>>>>>>>> -- Enrico Olivelli >> >>> > >>>>>>>>> >> >>> > >>>>>>>>> -- >> >>> > >>>>>>>> >> >>> > >>>>>>>> >> >>> > >>>>>>>> -- Enrico Olivelli >> >>> > >>>>>>> >> >>> > >>>>>>> >> >>> > >>>>>> >> >>> > >>>>> -- >> >>> > >>>>> >> >>> > >>>>> >> >>> > >>>>> -- Enrico Olivelli >> >>> > >>>>> >> >>> > >>>> >> >>> > >> >> >>> > >> >>> >> >> -- >> >> >> >> >> >> -- Enrico Olivelli >> >> >> > -- >> > >> > >> > -- Enrico Olivelli >> > >
Re: JDK 8 syntax
gt; at > >>> > >>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler.compileContext2( > >>> > UnitCompiler.java:4010) > >>> > >>>> at org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler.access$6100( > >>> > >> UnitCompiler.java:212) > >>> > >>>> at > >>> > >>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler$11$1. > visitFieldAccess(UnitCompiler. > >>> > >> java:3947) > >>> > >>>> at > >>> > >>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler$11$1. > visitFieldAccess(UnitCompiler. > >>> > >> java:3942) > >>> > >>>> at org.codehaus.janino.Java$FieldAccess.accept(Java.java: > 4139) > >>> > >>>> at > >>> > >>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler$11.visitLvalue( > >>> > UnitCompiler.java:3942) > >>> > >>>> at > >>> > >>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler$11.visitLvalue( > >>> > UnitCompiler.java:3938) > >>> > >>>> at org.codehaus.janino.Java$Lvalue.accept(Java.java:3977) > >>> > >>>> at > >>> > >>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler.compileContext( > >>> > UnitCompiler.java:3938) > >>> > >>>> at > >>> > >>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler.compileContext2( > >>> > UnitCompiler.java:4047) > >>> > >>>> at org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler.access$6200( > >>> > >> UnitCompiler.java:212) > >>> > >>>> at > >>> > >>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler$11$1. > visitFieldAccessExpression( > >>> > >> UnitCompiler.java:3948) > >>> > >>>> at > >>> > >>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler$11$1. > visitFieldAccessExpression( > >>> > >> UnitCompiler.java:3942) > >>> > >>>> at > >>> > >>> > >>> org.codehaus.janino.Java$FieldAccessExpression.accept(Java.java:4468) > >>> > >>>> at > >>> > >>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler$11.visitLvalue( > >>> > UnitCompiler.java:3942) > >>> > >>>> at > >>> > >>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler$11.visitLvalue( > >>> > UnitCompiler.java:3938) > >>> > >>>> at org.codehaus.janino.Java$Lvalue.accept(Java.java:3977) > >>> > >>>> at > >>> > >>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler.compileContext( > >>> > UnitCompiler.java:3938) > >>> > >>>> at > >>> > >>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler.compileGetValue( > >>> > UnitCompiler.java:5252) > >>> > >>>> at > >>> > >>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler.compileGet2( > UnitCompiler.java:4842) > >>> > >>>> at org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler.access$8300( > >>> > >> UnitCompiler.java:212) > >>> > >>>> at > >>> > >>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler$12.visitMethodInvocation( > >>> > >> UnitCompiler.java:4097) > >>> > >>>> at > >>> > >>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler$12.visitMethodInvocation( > >>> > >> UnitCompiler.java:4070) > >>> > >>>> at > >>> org.codehaus.janino.Java$MethodInvocation.accept(Java.java:4902) > >>> > >>>> at org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler.compileGet( > >>> > >> UnitCompiler.java:4070) > >>> > >>>> at > >>> > >>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler.compileGetValue( > >>> > UnitCompiler.java:5253) > >>> > >>>> at org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler.compile2( > >>> > UnitCompiler.java:2559) > >>> > >>>> at org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler.access$2700( > >>> > >> UnitCompiler.java:212) > >>> > >>>> at > >>> > >>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler$6. > visitLocalVariableDeclarationS > >>> > >> tatement(UnitCompiler.java:1482) > >>> > >>>> at > >>> > >>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler$6. > visitLocalVariableDeclarationS > >>> > >> tatement(UnitCompiler.java:1466) > >>> > >>>> at > >>> > >>> org.codehaus.janino.Java$LocalVariableDeclarationStatem > >>> > >> ent.accept(Java.java:3351) > >>> > >>>> at > >>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler.compile(UnitCompiler.java:1466) > >>> > >>>> at org.cod (stack truncated) > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> 2018-04-09 23:10 GMT+02:00 Cade Markegard < > cademarkeg...@gmail.com > >>> >: > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>>> Awesome! > >>> > >>>> > >>> > >>>> On Mon, Apr 9, 2018 at 1:29 PM Enrico Olivelli < > >>> eolive...@gmail.com> > >>> > >>>> wrote: > >>> > >>>> > >>> > >>>>> Il lun 9 apr 2018, 22:20 Cade Markegard < > cademarkeg...@gmail.com> > >>> ha > >>> > >>>>> scritto: > >>> > >>>>> > >>> > >>>>>> Not sure if this is related, but it seems like Janino doesn't > >>> > support > >>> > >>>>> Java8 > >>> > >>>>>> lambdas under "Limitations" in http://janino-compiler.github. > >>> > >>>> io/janino/ > >>> > >>>>> > >>> > >>>>> > >>> > >>>>> > >>> > >>>>> This should not be a problem, we are not generating java > sources > >>> with > >>> > >>>>> lambdas (maybe in future?). > >>> > >>>>> I will be happy to do some trials with new Janino, but I guess > >>> that > >>> > >> would > >>> > >>>>> be the only way (or to drop Janino, but I think it will be > >>> harder). I > >>> > >>>> have > >>> > >>>>> not much time these days. > >>> > >>>>> > >>> > >>>>> Anyhow I am testing my apps on jdk10 and Calcite is working > like a > >>> > >> charm > >>> > >>>> ! > >>> > >>>>> > >>> > >>>>> Enrico > >>> > >>>>> > >>> > >>>>>> > >>> > >>>>>> > >>> > >>>>>>> On Mon, Apr 9, 2018 at 12:54 PM Julian Hyde < > jh...@apache.org> > >>> > >> wrote: > >>> > >>>>>>> > >>> > >>>>>>> I didn’t try. We’re on janino 2.7.6. The 2.x line only goes > up > >>> to > >>> > >>>>> 2.7.8. > >>> > >>>>>>> I’m not eager to try upgrading to 3.x (latest release is > 3.0.8) > >>> > >>>>>> especially > >>> > >>>>>>> as they don’t explicitly mention fixing a JDK 8 issue. > >>> > >>>>>>> > >>> > >>>>>>> http://janino-compiler.github.io/janino/changelog.html < > >>> > >>>>>>> http://janino-compiler.github.io/janino/changelog.html> > >>> > >>>>>>> > >>> > >>>>>>> > >>> > >>>>>>>> On Apr 9, 2018, at 12:42 PM, Enrico Olivelli < > >>> eolive...@gmail.com > >>> > > > >>> > >>>>>>> wrote: > >>> > >>>>>>>> > >>> > >>>>>>>> Il lun 9 apr 2018, 21:37 Julian Hyde <jh...@apache.org > >>> >>> > >>>>>>> jh...@apache.org>> ha scritto: > >>> > >>>>>>>> > >>> > >>>>>>>>> Don’t have the error stack, but janino could not compile > >>> > generated > >>> > >>>>>> code > >>> > >>>>>>>>> because it said an “unwrap” method did not exist. > >>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>> > >>>>>>>>> There were no lambdas. I think perhaps that version of > janino > >>> > >>>> could > >>> > >>>>>> not > >>> > >>>>>>>>> fully understand the Calcite class files. > >>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>> > >>>>>>>>> To reproduce, change 2 lines in core/pom.xml and run “mvn > >>> test”. > >>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>> > >>>>>>>> > >>> > >>>>>>>> Did you try to update to latest Janino? > >>> > >>>>>>>> It seems to that we have an old version (2.7.6) > >>> > >>>>>>>> > >>> > >>>>>>>> Enrico > >>> > >>>>>>>> > >>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>> > >>>>>>>>> Julian > >>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>> > >>>>>>>>>> On Apr 9, 2018, at 12:15 PM, Enrico Olivelli < > >>> > >>>> eolive...@gmail.com> > >>> > >>>>>>>>> wrote: > >>> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>> > >>>>>>>>>> Il lun 9 apr 2018, 19:05 Julian Hyde <jh...@apache.org> > ha > >>> > >>>>> scritto: > >>> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>> > >>>>>>>>>>> Has anyone had any luck using JDK 8 syntax (e.g. “->” for > >>> > >>>> lambdas) > >>> > >>>>>> in > >>> > >>>>>>>>>>> Calcite? > >>> > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>> > >>>>>>>>>>> In core/pom.xml I changed source=1.7 target=1.7 to > source=8 > >>> > >>>>> target=8 > >>> > >>>>>>> and > >>> > >>>>>>>>>>> it allowed the syntax but it seemed to break any tests > that > >>> > >>>> relied > >>> > >>>>>> on > >>> > >>>>>>>>>>> janino. > >>> > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>> > >>>>>>>>>> Julian, > >>> > >>>>>>>>>> Could you please share a stacktrace of your error? > >>> > >>>>>>>>>> As far as I know using lambdas is not only a matter of > >>> syntactic > >>> > >>>>>> sugar > >>> > >>>>>>>>> but > >>> > >>>>>>>>>> they are more efficient than simple anonymous classes. > >>> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>> > >>>>>>>>>> Cheers > >>> > >>>>>>>>>> Enrico > >>> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>> > >>>>>>>>>>> Related: https://issues.apache.org/ > jira/browse/CALCITE-2027 > >>> < > >>> > >>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2027> > >>> > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>> > >>>>>>>>>>> Julian > >>> > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>> > >>>>>>>>>>> -- > >>> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>> > >>>>>>>>>> -- Enrico Olivelli > >>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>> > >>>>>>>>> -- > >>> > >>>>>>>> > >>> > >>>>>>>> > >>> > >>>>>>>> -- Enrico Olivelli > >>> > >>>>>>> > >>> > >>>>>>> > >>> > >>>>>> > >>> > >>>>> -- > >>> > >>>>> > >>> > >>>>> > >>> > >>>>> -- Enrico Olivelli > >>> > >>>>> > >>> > >>>> > >>> > >> > >>> > > >>> > >> -- > >> > >> > >> -- Enrico Olivelli > >> > > -- > > > > > > -- Enrico Olivelli >
Re: JDK 8 syntax
12) >>> > >>>> at >>> > >>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler$11$1.visitFieldAccessExpression( >>> > >> UnitCompiler.java:3948) >>> > >>>> at >>> > >>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler$11$1.visitFieldAccessExpression( >>> > >> UnitCompiler.java:3942) >>> > >>>> at >>> > >>> >>> org.codehaus.janino.Java$FieldAccessExpression.accept(Java.java:4468) >>> > >>>> at >>> > >>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler$11.visitLvalue( >>> > UnitCompiler.java:3942) >>> > >>>> at >>> > >>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler$11.visitLvalue( >>> > UnitCompiler.java:3938) >>> > >>>> at org.codehaus.janino.Java$Lvalue.accept(Java.java:3977) >>> > >>>> at >>> > >>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler.compileContext( >>> > UnitCompiler.java:3938) >>> > >>>> at >>> > >>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler.compileGetValue( >>> > UnitCompiler.java:5252) >>> > >>>> at >>> > >>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler.compileGet2(UnitCompiler.java:4842) >>> > >>>> at org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler.access$8300( >>> > >> UnitCompiler.java:212) >>> > >>>> at >>> > >>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler$12.visitMethodInvocation( >>> > >> UnitCompiler.java:4097) >>> > >>>> at >>> > >>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler$12.visitMethodInvocation( >>> > >> UnitCompiler.java:4070) >>> > >>>> at >>> org.codehaus.janino.Java$MethodInvocation.accept(Java.java:4902) >>> > >>>> at org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler.compileGet( >>> > >> UnitCompiler.java:4070) >>> > >>>> at >>> > >>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler.compileGetValue( >>> > UnitCompiler.java:5253) >>> > >>>> at org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler.compile2( >>> > UnitCompiler.java:2559) >>> > >>>> at org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler.access$2700( >>> > >> UnitCompiler.java:212) >>> > >>>> at >>> > >>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler$6.visitLocalVariableDeclarationS >>> > >> tatement(UnitCompiler.java:1482) >>> > >>>> at >>> > >>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler$6.visitLocalVariableDeclarationS >>> > >> tatement(UnitCompiler.java:1466) >>> > >>>> at >>> > >>> org.codehaus.janino.Java$LocalVariableDeclarationStatem >>> > >> ent.accept(Java.java:3351) >>> > >>>> at >>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler.compile(UnitCompiler.java:1466) >>> > >>>> at org.cod (stack truncated) >>> > >>> >>> > >>> >>> > >>> 2018-04-09 23:10 GMT+02:00 Cade Markegard <cademarkeg...@gmail.com >>> >: >>> > >>> >>> > >>>> Awesome! >>> > >>>> >>> > >>>> On Mon, Apr 9, 2018 at 1:29 PM Enrico Olivelli < >>> eolive...@gmail.com> >>> > >>>> wrote: >>> > >>>> >>> > >>>>> Il lun 9 apr 2018, 22:20 Cade Markegard <cademarkeg...@gmail.com> >>> ha >>> > >>>>> scritto: >>> > >>>>> >>> > >>>>>> Not sure if this is related, but it seems like Janino doesn't >>> > support >>> > >>>>> Java8 >>> > >>>>>> lambdas under "Limitations" in http://janino-compiler.github. >>> > >>>> io/janino/ >>> > >>>>> >>> > >>>>> >>> > >>>>> >>> > >>>>> This should not be a problem, we are not generating java sources >>> with >>> > >>>>> lambdas (maybe in future?). >>> > >>>>> I will be happy to do some trials with new Janino, but I guess >>> that >>> > >> would >>> > >>>>> be the only way (or to drop Janino, but I think it will be >>> harder). I >>> > >>>> have >>> > >>>>> not much time these days. >>> > >>>>> >>> > >>>>> Anyhow I am testing my apps on jdk10 and Calcite is working like a >>> > >> charm >>> > >>>> ! >>> > >>>>> >>> > >>>>> Enrico >>> > >>>>> >>> > >>>>>> >>> > >>>>>> >>> > >>>>>>> On Mon, Apr 9, 2018 at 12:54 PM Julian Hyde <jh...@apache.org> >>> > >> wrote: >>> > >>>>>>> >>> > >>>>>>> I didn’t try. We’re on janino 2.7.6. The 2.x line only goes up >>> to >>> > >>>>> 2.7.8. >>> > >>>>>>> I’m not eager to try upgrading to 3.x (latest release is 3.0.8) >>> > >>>>>> especially >>> > >>>>>>> as they don’t explicitly mention fixing a JDK 8 issue. >>> > >>>>>>> >>> > >>>>>>> http://janino-compiler.github.io/janino/changelog.html < >>> > >>>>>>> http://janino-compiler.github.io/janino/changelog.html> >>> > >>>>>>> >>> > >>>>>>> >>> > >>>>>>>> On Apr 9, 2018, at 12:42 PM, Enrico Olivelli < >>> eolive...@gmail.com >>> > > >>> > >>>>>>> wrote: >>> > >>>>>>>> >>> > >>>>>>>> Il lun 9 apr 2018, 21:37 Julian Hyde <jh...@apache.org >>> >> > >>>>>>> jh...@apache.org>> ha scritto: >>> > >>>>>>>> >>> > >>>>>>>>> Don’t have the error stack, but janino could not compile >>> > generated >>> > >>>>>> code >>> > >>>>>>>>> because it said an “unwrap” method did not exist. >>> > >>>>>>>>> >>> > >>>>>>>>> There were no lambdas. I think perhaps that version of janino >>> > >>>> could >>> > >>>>>> not >>> > >>>>>>>>> fully understand the Calcite class files. >>> > >>>>>>>>> >>> > >>>>>>>>> To reproduce, change 2 lines in core/pom.xml and run “mvn >>> test”. >>> > >>>>>>>>> >>> > >>>>>>>> >>> > >>>>>>>> Did you try to update to latest Janino? >>> > >>>>>>>> It seems to that we have an old version (2.7.6) >>> > >>>>>>>> >>> > >>>>>>>> Enrico >>> > >>>>>>>> >>> > >>>>>>>>> >>> > >>>>>>>>> Julian >>> > >>>>>>>>> >>> > >>>>>>>>> >>> > >>>>>>>>>> On Apr 9, 2018, at 12:15 PM, Enrico Olivelli < >>> > >>>> eolive...@gmail.com> >>> > >>>>>>>>> wrote: >>> > >>>>>>>>>> >>> > >>>>>>>>>> Il lun 9 apr 2018, 19:05 Julian Hyde <jh...@apache.org> ha >>> > >>>>> scritto: >>> > >>>>>>>>>> >>> > >>>>>>>>>>> Has anyone had any luck using JDK 8 syntax (e.g. “->” for >>> > >>>> lambdas) >>> > >>>>>> in >>> > >>>>>>>>>>> Calcite? >>> > >>>>>>>>>>> >>> > >>>>>>>>>>> In core/pom.xml I changed source=1.7 target=1.7 to source=8 >>> > >>>>> target=8 >>> > >>>>>>> and >>> > >>>>>>>>>>> it allowed the syntax but it seemed to break any tests that >>> > >>>> relied >>> > >>>>>> on >>> > >>>>>>>>>>> janino. >>> > >>>>>>>>>>> >>> > >>>>>>>>>> >>> > >>>>>>>>>> Julian, >>> > >>>>>>>>>> Could you please share a stacktrace of your error? >>> > >>>>>>>>>> As far as I know using lambdas is not only a matter of >>> syntactic >>> > >>>>>> sugar >>> > >>>>>>>>> but >>> > >>>>>>>>>> they are more efficient than simple anonymous classes. >>> > >>>>>>>>>> >>> > >>>>>>>>>> Cheers >>> > >>>>>>>>>> Enrico >>> > >>>>>>>>>> >>> > >>>>>>>>>> >>> > >>>>>>>>>>> Related: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2027 >>> < >>> > >>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2027> >>> > >>>>>>>>>>> >>> > >>>>>>>>>>> Julian >>> > >>>>>>>>>>> >>> > >>>>>>>>>>> -- >>> > >>>>>>>>>> >>> > >>>>>>>>>> >>> > >>>>>>>>>> -- Enrico Olivelli >>> > >>>>>>>>> >>> > >>>>>>>>> -- >>> > >>>>>>>> >>> > >>>>>>>> >>> > >>>>>>>> -- Enrico Olivelli >>> > >>>>>>> >>> > >>>>>>> >>> > >>>>>> >>> > >>>>> -- >>> > >>>>> >>> > >>>>> >>> > >>>>> -- Enrico Olivelli >>> > >>>>> >>> > >>>> >>> > >> >>> > >>> >> -- >> >> >> -- Enrico Olivelli >> > -- > > > -- Enrico Olivelli
Re: JDK 8 syntax
mpiler.access$7800( >> > >> UnitCompiler.java:212) >> > >>>> at >> > >>> >> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler$12.visitCast(UnitCompiler.java:4092) >> > >>>> at >> > >>> >> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler$12.visitCast(UnitCompiler.java:4070) >> > >>>> at org.codehaus.janino.Java$Cast.accept(Java.java:4727) >> > >>>> at org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler.compileGet( >> > >> UnitCompiler.java:4070) >> > >>>> at >> > >>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler.compileGet2(UnitCompiler.java:4732) >> > >>>> at org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler.access$7300( >> > >> UnitCompiler.java:212) >> > >>>> at >> > >>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler$12$1.visitParenthesizedExpression( >> > >> UnitCompiler.java:4083) >> > >>>> at >> > >>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler$12$1.visitParenthesizedExpression( >> > >> UnitCompiler.java:4074) >> > >>>> at >> > >>> org.codehaus.janino.Java$ParenthesizedExpression. >> > accept(Java.java:4753) >> > >>>> at >> > >>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler$12.visitLvalue( >> > UnitCompiler.java:4074) >> > >>>> at >> > >>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler$12.visitLvalue( >> > UnitCompiler.java:4070) >> > >>>> at org.codehaus.janino.Java$Lvalue.accept(Java.java:3977) >> > >>>> at org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler.compileGet( >> > >> UnitCompiler.java:4070) >> > >>>> at >> > >>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler.compileGetValue( >> > UnitCompiler.java:5253) >> > >>>> at >> > >>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler.compileContext2( >> > UnitCompiler.java:4010) >> > >>>> at org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler.access$6100( >> > >> UnitCompiler.java:212) >> > >>>> at >> > >>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler$11$1.visitFieldAccess(UnitCompiler. >> > >> java:3947) >> > >>>> at >> > >>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler$11$1.visitFieldAccess(UnitCompiler. >> > >> java:3942) >> > >>>> at org.codehaus.janino.Java$FieldAccess.accept(Java.java:4139) >> > >>>> at >> > >>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler$11.visitLvalue( >> > UnitCompiler.java:3942) >> > >>>> at >> > >>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler$11.visitLvalue( >> > UnitCompiler.java:3938) >> > >>>> at org.codehaus.janino.Java$Lvalue.accept(Java.java:3977) >> > >>>> at >> > >>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler.compileContext( >> > UnitCompiler.java:3938) >> > >>>> at >> > >>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler.compileContext2( >> > UnitCompiler.java:4047) >> > >>>> at org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler.access$6200( >> > >> UnitCompiler.java:212) >> > >>>> at >> > >>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler$11$1.visitFieldAccessExpression( >> > >> UnitCompiler.java:3948) >> > >>>> at >> > >>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler$11$1.visitFieldAccessExpression( >> > >> UnitCompiler.java:3942) >> > >>>> at >> > >>> >> org.codehaus.janino.Java$FieldAccessExpression.accept(Java.java:4468) >> > >>>> at >> > >>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler$11.visitLvalue( >> > UnitCompiler.java:3942) >> > >>>> at >> > >>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler$11.visitLvalue( >> > UnitCompiler.java:3938) >> > >>>> at org.codehaus.janino.Java$Lvalue.accept(Java.java:3977) >> > >>>> at >> > >>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler.compileContext( >> > UnitCompiler.java:3938) >> > >>>> at >> > >>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler.compileGetValue( >> > UnitCompiler.java:5252) >> > >>>> at >> > >>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler.compileGet2(UnitCompiler.java:4842) >> > >>>> at org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler.access$8300( >> > >> UnitCompiler.java:212) >> &
Re: JDK 8 syntax
.janino.UnitCompiler$12$1.visitParenthesizedExpression( > > >> UnitCompiler.java:4074) > > >>>> at > > >>> org.codehaus.janino.Java$ParenthesizedExpression. > > accept(Java.java:4753) > > >>>> at > > >>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler$12.visitLvalue( > > UnitCompiler.java:4074) > > >>>> at > > >>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler$12.visitLvalue( > > UnitCompiler.java:4070) > > >>>> at org.codehaus.janino.Java$Lvalue.accept(Java.java:3977) > > >>>> at org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler.compileGet( > > >> UnitCompiler.java:4070) > > >>>> at > > >>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler.compileGetValue( > > UnitCompiler.java:5253) > > >>>> at > > >>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler.compileContext2( > > UnitCompiler.java:4010) > > >>>> at org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler.access$6100( > > >> UnitCompiler.java:212) > > >>>> at > > >>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler$11$1.visitFieldAccess(UnitCompiler. > > >> java:3947) > > >>>> at > > >>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler$11$1.visitFieldAccess(UnitCompiler. > > >> java:3942) > > >>>> at org.codehaus.janino.Java$FieldAccess.accept(Java.java:4139) > > >>>> at > > >>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler$11.visitLvalue( > > UnitCompiler.java:3942) > > >>>> at > > >>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler$11.visitLvalue( > > UnitCompiler.java:3938) > > >>>> at org.codehaus.janino.Java$Lvalue.accept(Java.java:3977) > > >>>> at > > >>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler.compileContext( > > UnitCompiler.java:3938) > > >>>> at > > >>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler.compileContext2( > > UnitCompiler.java:4047) > > >>>> at org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler.access$6200( > > >> UnitCompiler.java:212) > > >>>> at > > >>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler$11$1.visitFieldAccessExpression( > > >> UnitCompiler.java:3948) > > >>>> at > > >>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler$11$1.visitFieldAccessExpression( > > >> UnitCompiler.java:3942) > > >>>> at > > >>> org.codehaus.janino.Java$FieldAccessExpression.accept(Java.java:4468) > > >>>> at > > >>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler$11.visitLvalue( > > UnitCompiler.java:3942) > > >>>> at > > >>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler$11.visitLvalue( > > UnitCompiler.java:3938) > > >>>> at org.codehaus.janino.Java$Lvalue.accept(Java.java:3977) > > >>>> at > > >>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler.compileContext( > > UnitCompiler.java:3938) > > >>>> at > > >>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler.compileGetValue( > > UnitCompiler.java:5252) > > >>>> at > > >>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler.compileGet2(UnitCompiler.java:4842) > > >>>> at org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler.access$8300( > > >> UnitCompiler.java:212) > > >>>> at > > >>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler$12.visitMethodInvocation( > > >> UnitCompiler.java:4097) > > >>>> at > > >>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler$12.visitMethodInvocation( > > >> UnitCompiler.java:4070) > > >>>> at > org.codehaus.janino.Java$MethodInvocation.accept(Java.java:4902) > > >>>> at org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler.compileGet( > > >> UnitCompiler.java:4070) > > >>>> at > > >>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler.compileGetValue( > > UnitCompiler.java:5253) > > >>>> at org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler.compile2( > > UnitCompiler.java:2559) > > >>>> at org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler.access$2700( > > >> UnitCompiler.java:212) > > >>>> at > > >>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler$6.visitLocalVariableDeclarationS > > >> tatement(UnitCompiler.java:1482) > > >>>> at > > >>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler$6.visitLocalVariableDeclarationS > > >> tatement(UnitCompiler.java:1466) > > >>>> at > > >>> org.codehaus.janino.Java$LocalVariableDeclarationStatem > > >> ent.accep
Re: JDK 8 syntax
1.visitFieldAccess(UnitCompiler. > >> java:3942) > >>>> at org.codehaus.janino.Java$FieldAccess.accept(Java.java:4139) > >>>> at > >>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler$11.visitLvalue( > UnitCompiler.java:3942) > >>>> at > >>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler$11.visitLvalue( > UnitCompiler.java:3938) > >>>> at org.codehaus.janino.Java$Lvalue.accept(Java.java:3977) > >>>> at > >>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler.compileContext( > UnitCompiler.java:3938) > >>>> at > >>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler.compileContext2( > UnitCompiler.java:4047) > >>>> at org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler.access$6200( > >> UnitCompiler.java:212) > >>>> at > >>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler$11$1.visitFieldAccessExpression( > >> UnitCompiler.java:3948) > >>>> at > >>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler$11$1.visitFieldAccessExpression( > >> UnitCompiler.java:3942) > >>>> at > >>> org.codehaus.janino.Java$FieldAccessExpression.accept(Java.java:4468) > >>>> at > >>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler$11.visitLvalue( > UnitCompiler.java:3942) > >>>> at > >>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler$11.visitLvalue( > UnitCompiler.java:3938) > >>>> at org.codehaus.janino.Java$Lvalue.accept(Java.java:3977) > >>>> at > >>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler.compileContext( > UnitCompiler.java:3938) > >>>> at > >>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler.compileGetValue( > UnitCompiler.java:5252) > >>>> at > >>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler.compileGet2(UnitCompiler.java:4842) > >>>> at org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler.access$8300( > >> UnitCompiler.java:212) > >>>> at > >>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler$12.visitMethodInvocation( > >> UnitCompiler.java:4097) > >>>> at > >>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler$12.visitMethodInvocation( > >> UnitCompiler.java:4070) > >>>> at org.codehaus.janino.Java$MethodInvocation.accept(Java.java:4902) > >>>> at org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler.compileGet( > >> UnitCompiler.java:4070) > >>>> at > >>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler.compileGetValue( > UnitCompiler.java:5253) > >>>> at org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler.compile2( > UnitCompiler.java:2559) > >>>> at org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler.access$2700( > >> UnitCompiler.java:212) > >>>> at > >>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler$6.visitLocalVariableDeclarationS > >> tatement(UnitCompiler.java:1482) > >>>> at > >>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler$6.visitLocalVariableDeclarationS > >> tatement(UnitCompiler.java:1466) > >>>> at > >>> org.codehaus.janino.Java$LocalVariableDeclarationStatem > >> ent.accept(Java.java:3351) > >>>> at org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler.compile(UnitCompiler.java:1466) > >>>> at org.cod (stack truncated) > >>> > >>> > >>> 2018-04-09 23:10 GMT+02:00 Cade Markegard <cademarkeg...@gmail.com>: > >>> > >>>> Awesome! > >>>> > >>>> On Mon, Apr 9, 2018 at 1:29 PM Enrico Olivelli <eolive...@gmail.com> > >>>> wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> Il lun 9 apr 2018, 22:20 Cade Markegard <cademarkeg...@gmail.com> ha > >>>>> scritto: > >>>>> > >>>>>> Not sure if this is related, but it seems like Janino doesn't > support > >>>>> Java8 > >>>>>> lambdas under "Limitations" in http://janino-compiler.github. > >>>> io/janino/ > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> This should not be a problem, we are not generating java sources with > >>>>> lambdas (maybe in future?). > >>>>> I will be happy to do some trials with new Janino, but I guess that > >> would > >>>>> be the only way (or to drop Janino, but I think it will be harder). I > >>>> have > >>>>> not much time these days. > >>>>> > >>>>> Anyhow I am testing my apps on jdk10 and Calcite is working like a > >> charm > >>>> ! > >>>>> > >>>>> Enrico > >>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> On Mon, Apr 9, 2018 at 12:54 PM Julian Hyde <jh...@apache.org> > >> wrote: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> I didn’t try. We’re on janino 2.7.6. The 2.x line only goes up to > >>>>> 2.7.8. > >>>>>>> I’m not eager to try upgrading to 3.x (latest release is 3.0.8) > >>>>>> especially > >>>>>>> as they don’t explicitly mention fixing a JDK 8 issue. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> http://janino-compiler.github.io/janino/changelog.html < > >>>>>>> http://janino-compiler.github.io/janino/changelog.html> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> On Apr 9, 2018, at 12:42 PM, Enrico Olivelli <eolive...@gmail.com > > > >>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Il lun 9 apr 2018, 21:37 Julian Hyde <jh...@apache.org >>>>>>> jh...@apache.org>> ha scritto: > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Don’t have the error stack, but janino could not compile > generated > >>>>>> code > >>>>>>>>> because it said an “unwrap” method did not exist. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> There were no lambdas. I think perhaps that version of janino > >>>> could > >>>>>> not > >>>>>>>>> fully understand the Calcite class files. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> To reproduce, change 2 lines in core/pom.xml and run “mvn test”. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Did you try to update to latest Janino? > >>>>>>>> It seems to that we have an old version (2.7.6) > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Enrico > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Julian > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> On Apr 9, 2018, at 12:15 PM, Enrico Olivelli < > >>>> eolive...@gmail.com> > >>>>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> Il lun 9 apr 2018, 19:05 Julian Hyde <jh...@apache.org> ha > >>>>> scritto: > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> Has anyone had any luck using JDK 8 syntax (e.g. “->” for > >>>> lambdas) > >>>>>> in > >>>>>>>>>>> Calcite? > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> In core/pom.xml I changed source=1.7 target=1.7 to source=8 > >>>>> target=8 > >>>>>>> and > >>>>>>>>>>> it allowed the syntax but it seemed to break any tests that > >>>> relied > >>>>>> on > >>>>>>>>>>> janino. > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> Julian, > >>>>>>>>>> Could you please share a stacktrace of your error? > >>>>>>>>>> As far as I know using lambdas is not only a matter of syntactic > >>>>>> sugar > >>>>>>>>> but > >>>>>>>>>> they are more efficient than simple anonymous classes. > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> Cheers > >>>>>>>>>> Enrico > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> Related: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2027 < > >>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2027> > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> Julian > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> -- > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> -- Enrico Olivelli > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> -- > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> -- Enrico Olivelli > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>> -- > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> -- Enrico Olivelli > >>>>> > >>>> > >> >
Re: JDK 8 syntax
t;>> at org.codehaus.janino.Java$MethodInvocation.accept(Java.java:4902) >>>> at org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler.compileGet( >> UnitCompiler.java:4070) >>>> at >>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler.compileGetValue(UnitCompiler.java:5253) >>>> at org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler.compile2(UnitCompiler.java:2559) >>>> at org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler.access$2700( >> UnitCompiler.java:212) >>>> at >>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler$6.visitLocalVariableDeclarationS >> tatement(UnitCompiler.java:1482) >>>> at >>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler$6.visitLocalVariableDeclarationS >> tatement(UnitCompiler.java:1466) >>>> at >>> org.codehaus.janino.Java$LocalVariableDeclarationStatem >> ent.accept(Java.java:3351) >>>> at org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler.compile(UnitCompiler.java:1466) >>>> at org.cod (stack truncated) >>> >>> >>> 2018-04-09 23:10 GMT+02:00 Cade Markegard <cademarkeg...@gmail.com>: >>> >>>> Awesome! >>>> >>>> On Mon, Apr 9, 2018 at 1:29 PM Enrico Olivelli <eolive...@gmail.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Il lun 9 apr 2018, 22:20 Cade Markegard <cademarkeg...@gmail.com> ha >>>>> scritto: >>>>> >>>>>> Not sure if this is related, but it seems like Janino doesn't support >>>>> Java8 >>>>>> lambdas under "Limitations" in http://janino-compiler.github. >>>> io/janino/ >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> This should not be a problem, we are not generating java sources with >>>>> lambdas (maybe in future?). >>>>> I will be happy to do some trials with new Janino, but I guess that >> would >>>>> be the only way (or to drop Janino, but I think it will be harder). I >>>> have >>>>> not much time these days. >>>>> >>>>> Anyhow I am testing my apps on jdk10 and Calcite is working like a >> charm >>>> ! >>>>> >>>>> Enrico >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> On Mon, Apr 9, 2018 at 12:54 PM Julian Hyde <jh...@apache.org> >> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I didn’t try. We’re on janino 2.7.6. The 2.x line only goes up to >>>>> 2.7.8. >>>>>>> I’m not eager to try upgrading to 3.x (latest release is 3.0.8) >>>>>> especially >>>>>>> as they don’t explicitly mention fixing a JDK 8 issue. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> http://janino-compiler.github.io/janino/changelog.html < >>>>>>> http://janino-compiler.github.io/janino/changelog.html> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Apr 9, 2018, at 12:42 PM, Enrico Olivelli <eolive...@gmail.com> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Il lun 9 apr 2018, 21:37 Julian Hyde <jh...@apache.org >>>>>> jh...@apache.org>> ha scritto: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Don’t have the error stack, but janino could not compile generated >>>>>> code >>>>>>>>> because it said an “unwrap” method did not exist. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> There were no lambdas. I think perhaps that version of janino >>>> could >>>>>> not >>>>>>>>> fully understand the Calcite class files. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> To reproduce, change 2 lines in core/pom.xml and run “mvn test”. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Did you try to update to latest Janino? >>>>>>>> It seems to that we have an old version (2.7.6) >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Enrico >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Julian >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Apr 9, 2018, at 12:15 PM, Enrico Olivelli < >>>> eolive...@gmail.com> >>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Il lun 9 apr 2018, 19:05 Julian Hyde <jh...@apache.org> ha >>>>> scritto: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Has anyone had any luck using JDK 8 syntax (e.g. “->” for >>>> lambdas) >>>>>> in >>>>>>>>>>> Calcite? >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> In core/pom.xml I changed source=1.7 target=1.7 to source=8 >>>>> target=8 >>>>>>> and >>>>>>>>>>> it allowed the syntax but it seemed to break any tests that >>>> relied >>>>>> on >>>>>>>>>>> janino. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Julian, >>>>>>>>>> Could you please share a stacktrace of your error? >>>>>>>>>> As far as I know using lambdas is not only a matter of syntactic >>>>>> sugar >>>>>>>>> but >>>>>>>>>> they are more efficient than simple anonymous classes. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Cheers >>>>>>>>>> Enrico >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Related: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2027 < >>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2027> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Julian >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> -- Enrico Olivelli >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -- Enrico Olivelli >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- Enrico Olivelli >>>>> >>>> >>
Re: JDK 8 syntax
compile(UnitCompiler.java:1466) > >>at org.cod (stack truncated) > > > > > > 2018-04-09 23:10 GMT+02:00 Cade Markegard <cademarkeg...@gmail.com>: > > > >> Awesome! > >> > >> On Mon, Apr 9, 2018 at 1:29 PM Enrico Olivelli <eolive...@gmail.com> > >> wrote: > >> > >>> Il lun 9 apr 2018, 22:20 Cade Markegard <cademarkeg...@gmail.com> ha > >>> scritto: > >>> > >>>> Not sure if this is related, but it seems like Janino doesn't support > >>> Java8 > >>>> lambdas under "Limitations" in http://janino-compiler.github. > >> io/janino/ > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> This should not be a problem, we are not generating java sources with > >>> lambdas (maybe in future?). > >>> I will be happy to do some trials with new Janino, but I guess that > would > >>> be the only way (or to drop Janino, but I think it will be harder). I > >> have > >>> not much time these days. > >>> > >>> Anyhow I am testing my apps on jdk10 and Calcite is working like a > charm > >> ! > >>> > >>> Enrico > >>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>>> On Mon, Apr 9, 2018 at 12:54 PM Julian Hyde <jh...@apache.org> > wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>> I didn’t try. We’re on janino 2.7.6. The 2.x line only goes up to > >>> 2.7.8. > >>>>> I’m not eager to try upgrading to 3.x (latest release is 3.0.8) > >>>> especially > >>>>> as they don’t explicitly mention fixing a JDK 8 issue. > >>>>> > >>>>> http://janino-compiler.github.io/janino/changelog.html < > >>>>> http://janino-compiler.github.io/janino/changelog.html> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>>> On Apr 9, 2018, at 12:42 PM, Enrico Olivelli <eolive...@gmail.com> > >>>>> wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Il lun 9 apr 2018, 21:37 Julian Hyde <jh...@apache.org >>>>> jh...@apache.org>> ha scritto: > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> Don’t have the error stack, but janino could not compile generated > >>>> code > >>>>>>> because it said an “unwrap” method did not exist. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> There were no lambdas. I think perhaps that version of janino > >> could > >>>> not > >>>>>>> fully understand the Calcite class files. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> To reproduce, change 2 lines in core/pom.xml and run “mvn test”. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Did you try to update to latest Janino? > >>>>>> It seems to that we have an old version (2.7.6) > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Enrico > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Julian > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> On Apr 9, 2018, at 12:15 PM, Enrico Olivelli < > >> eolive...@gmail.com> > >>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Il lun 9 apr 2018, 19:05 Julian Hyde <jh...@apache.org> ha > >>> scritto: > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Has anyone had any luck using JDK 8 syntax (e.g. “->” for > >> lambdas) > >>>> in > >>>>>>>>> Calcite? > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> In core/pom.xml I changed source=1.7 target=1.7 to source=8 > >>> target=8 > >>>>> and > >>>>>>>>> it allowed the syntax but it seemed to break any tests that > >> relied > >>>> on > >>>>>>>>> janino. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Julian, > >>>>>>>> Could you please share a stacktrace of your error? > >>>>>>>> As far as I know using lambdas is not only a matter of syntactic > >>>> sugar > >>>>>>> but > >>>>>>>> they are more efficient than simple anonymous classes. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Cheers > >>>>>>>> Enrico > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Related: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2027 < > >>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2027> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Julian > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> -- > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> -- Enrico Olivelli > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> -- > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> -- Enrico Olivelli > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> > >>> -- > >>> > >>> > >>> -- Enrico Olivelli > >>> > >> >
Re: JDK 8 syntax
itCompiler.access$6100(UnitCompiler.java:212) > at org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler$11$1.visitFieldAccess(UnitCompiler.java:3947) > at org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler$11$1.visitFieldAccess(UnitCompiler.java:3942) > at org.codehaus.janino.Java$FieldAccess.accept(Java.java:4139) > at org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler$11.visitLvalue(UnitCompiler.java:3942) > at org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler$11.visitLvalue(UnitCompiler.java:3938) > at org.codehaus.janino.Java$Lvalue.accept(Java.java:3977) > at org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler.compileContext(UnitCompiler.java:3938) > at org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler.compileContext2(UnitCompiler.java:4047) > at org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler.access$6200(UnitCompiler.java:212) > at org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler$11$1.visitFieldAccessExpression(UnitCompiler.java:3948) > at org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler$11$1.visitFieldAccessExpression(UnitCompiler.java:3942) > at org.codehaus.janino.Java$FieldAccessExpression.accept(Java.java:4468) > at org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler$11.visitLvalue(UnitCompiler.java:3942) > at org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler$11.visitLvalue(UnitCompiler.java:3938) > at org.codehaus.janino.Java$Lvalue.accept(Java.java:3977) > at org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler.compileContext(UnitCompiler.java:3938) > at org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler.compileGetValue(UnitCompiler.java:5252) > at org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler.compileGet2(UnitCompiler.java:4842) > at org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler.access$8300(UnitCompiler.java:212) > at org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler$12.visitMethodInvocation(UnitCompiler.java:4097) > at org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler$12.visitMethodInvocation(UnitCompiler.java:4070) > at org.codehaus.janino.Java$MethodInvocation.accept(Java.java:4902) > at org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler.compileGet(UnitCompiler.java:4070) > at org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler.compileGetValue(UnitCompiler.java:5253) > at org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler.compile2(UnitCompiler.java:2559) > at org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler.access$2700(UnitCompiler.java:212) > at org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler$6.visitLocalVariableDeclarationStatement(UnitCompiler.java:1482) > at org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler$6.visitLocalVariableDeclarationStatement(UnitCompiler.java:1466) > at org.codehaus.janino.Java$LocalVariableDeclarationStatement.accept(Java.java:3351) > at org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler.compile(UnitCompiler.java:1466) > at org.cod (stack truncated) 2018-04-09 23:10 GMT+02:00 Cade Markegard <cademarkeg...@gmail.com>: > Awesome! > > On Mon, Apr 9, 2018 at 1:29 PM Enrico Olivelli <eolive...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > Il lun 9 apr 2018, 22:20 Cade Markegard <cademarkeg...@gmail.com> ha > > scritto: > > > > > Not sure if this is related, but it seems like Janino doesn't support > > Java8 > > > lambdas under "Limitations" in http://janino-compiler.github. > io/janino/ > > > > > > > > This should not be a problem, we are not generating java sources with > > lambdas (maybe in future?). > > I will be happy to do some trials with new Janino, but I guess that would > > be the only way (or to drop Janino, but I think it will be harder). I > have > > not much time these days. > > > > Anyhow I am testing my apps on jdk10 and Calcite is working like a charm > ! > > > > Enrico > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Apr 9, 2018 at 12:54 PM Julian Hyde <jh...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > > > > I didn’t try. We’re on janino 2.7.6. The 2.x line only goes up to > > 2.7.8. > > > > I’m not eager to try upgrading to 3.x (latest release is 3.0.8) > > > especially > > > > as they don’t explicitly mention fixing a JDK 8 issue. > > > > > > > > http://janino-compiler.github.io/janino/changelog.html < > > > > http://janino-compiler.github.io/janino/changelog.html> > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Apr 9, 2018, at 12:42 PM, Enrico Olivelli <eolive...@gmail.com> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Il lun 9 apr 2018, 21:37 Julian Hyde <jh...@apache.org > > > jh...@apache.org>> ha scritto: > > > > > > > > > >> Don’t have the error stack, but janino could not compile generated > > > code > > > > >> because it said an “unwrap” method did not exist. > > > > >> > > > > >> There were no lambdas. I think perhaps that version of janino > could > > > not > > > > >> fully understan
Re: JDK 8 syntax
Awesome! On Mon, Apr 9, 2018 at 1:29 PM Enrico Olivelli <eolive...@gmail.com> wrote: > Il lun 9 apr 2018, 22:20 Cade Markegard <cademarkeg...@gmail.com> ha > scritto: > > > Not sure if this is related, but it seems like Janino doesn't support > Java8 > > lambdas under "Limitations" in http://janino-compiler.github.io/janino/ > > > > This should not be a problem, we are not generating java sources with > lambdas (maybe in future?). > I will be happy to do some trials with new Janino, but I guess that would > be the only way (or to drop Janino, but I think it will be harder). I have > not much time these days. > > Anyhow I am testing my apps on jdk10 and Calcite is working like a charm ! > > Enrico > > > > > > > On Mon, Apr 9, 2018 at 12:54 PM Julian Hyde <jh...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > > I didn’t try. We’re on janino 2.7.6. The 2.x line only goes up to > 2.7.8. > > > I’m not eager to try upgrading to 3.x (latest release is 3.0.8) > > especially > > > as they don’t explicitly mention fixing a JDK 8 issue. > > > > > > http://janino-compiler.github.io/janino/changelog.html < > > > http://janino-compiler.github.io/janino/changelog.html> > > > > > > > > > > On Apr 9, 2018, at 12:42 PM, Enrico Olivelli <eolive...@gmail.com> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > Il lun 9 apr 2018, 21:37 Julian Hyde <jh...@apache.org > > jh...@apache.org>> ha scritto: > > > > > > > >> Don’t have the error stack, but janino could not compile generated > > code > > > >> because it said an “unwrap” method did not exist. > > > >> > > > >> There were no lambdas. I think perhaps that version of janino could > > not > > > >> fully understand the Calcite class files. > > > >> > > > >> To reproduce, change 2 lines in core/pom.xml and run “mvn test”. > > > >> > > > > > > > > Did you try to update to latest Janino? > > > > It seems to that we have an old version (2.7.6) > > > > > > > > Enrico > > > > > > > >> > > > >> Julian > > > >> > > > >> > > > >>> On Apr 9, 2018, at 12:15 PM, Enrico Olivelli <eolive...@gmail.com> > > > >> wrote: > > > >>> > > > >>> Il lun 9 apr 2018, 19:05 Julian Hyde <jh...@apache.org> ha > scritto: > > > >>> > > > >>>> Has anyone had any luck using JDK 8 syntax (e.g. “->” for lambdas) > > in > > > >>>> Calcite? > > > >>>> > > > >>>> In core/pom.xml I changed source=1.7 target=1.7 to source=8 > target=8 > > > and > > > >>>> it allowed the syntax but it seemed to break any tests that relied > > on > > > >>>> janino. > > > >>>> > > > >>> > > > >>> Julian, > > > >>> Could you please share a stacktrace of your error? > > > >>> As far as I know using lambdas is not only a matter of syntactic > > sugar > > > >> but > > > >>> they are more efficient than simple anonymous classes. > > > >>> > > > >>> Cheers > > > >>> Enrico > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>>> Related: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2027 < > > > >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2027> > > > >>>> > > > >>>> Julian > > > >>>> > > > >>>> -- > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> -- Enrico Olivelli > > > >> > > > >> -- > > > > > > > > > > > > -- Enrico Olivelli > > > > > > > > > -- > > > -- Enrico Olivelli >
Re: JDK 8 syntax
Not sure if this is related, but it seems like Janino doesn't support Java8 lambdas under "Limitations" in http://janino-compiler.github.io/janino/ On Mon, Apr 9, 2018 at 12:54 PM Julian Hyde <jh...@apache.org> wrote: > I didn’t try. We’re on janino 2.7.6. The 2.x line only goes up to 2.7.8. > I’m not eager to try upgrading to 3.x (latest release is 3.0.8) especially > as they don’t explicitly mention fixing a JDK 8 issue. > > http://janino-compiler.github.io/janino/changelog.html < > http://janino-compiler.github.io/janino/changelog.html> > > > > On Apr 9, 2018, at 12:42 PM, Enrico Olivelli <eolive...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > Il lun 9 apr 2018, 21:37 Julian Hyde <jh...@apache.org jh...@apache.org>> ha scritto: > > > >> Don’t have the error stack, but janino could not compile generated code > >> because it said an “unwrap” method did not exist. > >> > >> There were no lambdas. I think perhaps that version of janino could not > >> fully understand the Calcite class files. > >> > >> To reproduce, change 2 lines in core/pom.xml and run “mvn test”. > >> > > > > Did you try to update to latest Janino? > > It seems to that we have an old version (2.7.6) > > > > Enrico > > > >> > >> Julian > >> > >> > >>> On Apr 9, 2018, at 12:15 PM, Enrico Olivelli <eolive...@gmail.com> > >> wrote: > >>> > >>> Il lun 9 apr 2018, 19:05 Julian Hyde <jh...@apache.org> ha scritto: > >>> > >>>> Has anyone had any luck using JDK 8 syntax (e.g. “->” for lambdas) in > >>>> Calcite? > >>>> > >>>> In core/pom.xml I changed source=1.7 target=1.7 to source=8 target=8 > and > >>>> it allowed the syntax but it seemed to break any tests that relied on > >>>> janino. > >>>> > >>> > >>> Julian, > >>> Could you please share a stacktrace of your error? > >>> As far as I know using lambdas is not only a matter of syntactic sugar > >> but > >>> they are more efficient than simple anonymous classes. > >>> > >>> Cheers > >>> Enrico > >>> > >>> > >>>> Related: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2027 < > >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2027> > >>>> > >>>> Julian > >>>> > >>>> -- > >>> > >>> > >>> -- Enrico Olivelli > >> > >> -- > > > > > > -- Enrico Olivelli > >
Re: JDK 8 syntax
I didn’t try. We’re on janino 2.7.6. The 2.x line only goes up to 2.7.8. I’m not eager to try upgrading to 3.x (latest release is 3.0.8) especially as they don’t explicitly mention fixing a JDK 8 issue. http://janino-compiler.github.io/janino/changelog.html <http://janino-compiler.github.io/janino/changelog.html> > On Apr 9, 2018, at 12:42 PM, Enrico Olivelli <eolive...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Il lun 9 apr 2018, 21:37 Julian Hyde <jh...@apache.org > <mailto:jh...@apache.org>> ha scritto: > >> Don’t have the error stack, but janino could not compile generated code >> because it said an “unwrap” method did not exist. >> >> There were no lambdas. I think perhaps that version of janino could not >> fully understand the Calcite class files. >> >> To reproduce, change 2 lines in core/pom.xml and run “mvn test”. >> > > Did you try to update to latest Janino? > It seems to that we have an old version (2.7.6) > > Enrico > >> >> Julian >> >> >>> On Apr 9, 2018, at 12:15 PM, Enrico Olivelli <eolive...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >>> >>> Il lun 9 apr 2018, 19:05 Julian Hyde <jh...@apache.org> ha scritto: >>> >>>> Has anyone had any luck using JDK 8 syntax (e.g. “->” for lambdas) in >>>> Calcite? >>>> >>>> In core/pom.xml I changed source=1.7 target=1.7 to source=8 target=8 and >>>> it allowed the syntax but it seemed to break any tests that relied on >>>> janino. >>>> >>> >>> Julian, >>> Could you please share a stacktrace of your error? >>> As far as I know using lambdas is not only a matter of syntactic sugar >> but >>> they are more efficient than simple anonymous classes. >>> >>> Cheers >>> Enrico >>> >>> >>>> Related: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2027 < >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2027> >>>> >>>> Julian >>>> >>>> -- >>> >>> >>> -- Enrico Olivelli >> >> -- > > > -- Enrico Olivelli
Re: JDK 8 syntax
Il lun 9 apr 2018, 21:37 Julian Hyde <jh...@apache.org> ha scritto: > Don’t have the error stack, but janino could not compile generated code > because it said an “unwrap” method did not exist. > > There were no lambdas. I think perhaps that version of janino could not > fully understand the Calcite class files. > > To reproduce, change 2 lines in core/pom.xml and run “mvn test”. > Did you try to update to latest Janino? It seems to that we have an old version (2.7.6) Enrico > > Julian > > > > On Apr 9, 2018, at 12:15 PM, Enrico Olivelli <eolive...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > Il lun 9 apr 2018, 19:05 Julian Hyde <jh...@apache.org> ha scritto: > > > >> Has anyone had any luck using JDK 8 syntax (e.g. “->” for lambdas) in > >> Calcite? > >> > >> In core/pom.xml I changed source=1.7 target=1.7 to source=8 target=8 and > >> it allowed the syntax but it seemed to break any tests that relied on > >> janino. > >> > > > > Julian, > > Could you please share a stacktrace of your error? > > As far as I know using lambdas is not only a matter of syntactic sugar > but > > they are more efficient than simple anonymous classes. > > > > Cheers > > Enrico > > > > > >> Related: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2027 < > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2027> > >> > >> Julian > >> > >> -- > > > > > > -- Enrico Olivelli > > -- -- Enrico Olivelli
Re: JDK 8 syntax
Don’t have the error stack, but janino could not compile generated code because it said an “unwrap” method did not exist. There were no lambdas. I think perhaps that version of janino could not fully understand the Calcite class files. To reproduce, change 2 lines in core/pom.xml and run “mvn test”. Julian > On Apr 9, 2018, at 12:15 PM, Enrico Olivelli <eolive...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Il lun 9 apr 2018, 19:05 Julian Hyde <jh...@apache.org> ha scritto: > >> Has anyone had any luck using JDK 8 syntax (e.g. “->” for lambdas) in >> Calcite? >> >> In core/pom.xml I changed source=1.7 target=1.7 to source=8 target=8 and >> it allowed the syntax but it seemed to break any tests that relied on >> janino. >> > > Julian, > Could you please share a stacktrace of your error? > As far as I know using lambdas is not only a matter of syntactic sugar but > they are more efficient than simple anonymous classes. > > Cheers > Enrico > > >> Related: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2027 < >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2027> >> >> Julian >> >> -- > > > -- Enrico Olivelli
Re: JDK 8 syntax
Il lun 9 apr 2018, 19:05 Julian Hyde <jh...@apache.org> ha scritto: > Has anyone had any luck using JDK 8 syntax (e.g. “->” for lambdas) in > Calcite? > > In core/pom.xml I changed source=1.7 target=1.7 to source=8 target=8 and > it allowed the syntax but it seemed to break any tests that relied on > janino. > Julian, Could you please share a stacktrace of your error? As far as I know using lambdas is not only a matter of syntactic sugar but they are more efficient than simple anonymous classes. Cheers Enrico > Related: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2027 < > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2027> > > Julian > > -- -- Enrico Olivelli
JDK 8 syntax
Has anyone had any luck using JDK 8 syntax (e.g. “->” for lambdas) in Calcite? In core/pom.xml I changed source=1.7 target=1.7 to source=8 target=8 and it allowed the syntax but it seemed to break any tests that relied on janino. Related: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2027 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2027> Julian
