Re: [DISCUSS] Towards Calcite 1.18

Ok, good. I’ve just started a vote for RC2. > On Dec 18, 2018, at 6:40 AM, Zoltan Haindrich wrote: > > Hello, > > Sorry for holding it back...I was busy doing other things... > I've went thru it; and right now I don't see any new issues; I've only > noticed a bug going away :) > > cheers, >

Re: [DISCUSS] Towards Calcite 1.18

Hello, Sorry for holding it back...I was busy doing other things... I've went thru it; and right now I don't see any new issues; I've only noticed a bug going away :) cheers, Zoltan On 12/18/18 3:21 AM, Julian Hyde wrote: Zoltan, Can you give us a status update please? The release train is

Re: [DISCUSS] Towards Calcite 1.18

Zoltan, Can you give us a status update please? The release train is waiting for you. Julian > On Dec 16, 2018, at 12:20 PM, Julian Hyde wrote: > > An update on release 1.18. > > We have had two release candidates RC0 and RC1, and both votes have > been cancelled due to faults found by

Re: [DISCUSS] Towards Calcite 1.18

An update on release 1.18. We have had two release candidates RC0 and RC1, and both votes have been cancelled due to faults found by Hive's test suite. I will roll RC2 when I hear from Zoltan that the Hive suite has passed against the latest commit. See

Re: [DISCUSS] Towards Calcite 1.18

Julian, Avatica 1.13.0 has been tagged and pushed. I also uploaded the release artifacts and I am just waiting for the artifacts to propagate across the mirrors before I make a formal announcement and push the website. Francis On 3/12/2018 10:08 am, Julian Hyde wrote: Francis, Much

Re: [DISCUSS] Towards Calcite 1.18

Francis, Much appreciated! The nexus push was successful, and I was able to use avatica-1.13 in builds. I'll make sure that we do not announce the Calcite release 1.18, or push the https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2716 fix to master, until avatica-1.13 is officially announced.

Re: [DISCUSS] Towards Calcite 1.18

Thanks for taking this on, Julian! The vote for Avatica 1.13.0 has closed and I plan to release the 1.13.0 soon (I need to wait for the docker hub repository in INFRA-17333 [1] to be created, otherwise the docker hub build will fail once I push the tag for rel/avatica-1.13.0. I've promoted

Re: [DISCUSS] Towards Calcite 1.18

Thanks Julian! Unfortunately with family visiting this weekend, my bandwidth is currently fairly low but I'll try to churn through some PRs early this coming week. On Fri, Nov 30, 2018, 23:00 Julian Hyde It looks as if Avatica will be released soon, and as that was our main > dependency for

Re: [DISCUSS] Towards Calcite 1.18

It looks as if Avatica will be released soon, and as that was our main dependency for Calcite 1.18, we can move ahead with the release. I volunteer to be release manager for Calcite 1.18, and propose that we make an RC on Monday. There are a lot of PRs (107 open currently)[1]. I can’t get

Re: [DISCUSS] Towards Calcite 1.18

Not strictly necessary I believe, but I know there's a desire to upgrade Jetty in Calcite that can't happen until the Avatica release, so it would be nice to see that happen first. Le lun. 5 nov. 2018 à 16:31, Francis Chuang a écrit : > I think we should consider releasing new versions of

Re: [DISCUSS] Towards Calcite 1.18

I think we should consider releasing new versions of Calcite and Avatica soon, especially with the Thanksgiving holiday in North America and Christmas + New Year later in December/January coming up. Am I correct to assume that we need to release Avatica 1.13.0 before Calcite 1.18.0? If so,

Re: [DISCUSS] Towards Calcite 1.18

I think we should consider releasing new versions of Calcite and Avatica soon, especially with the Thanksgiving holiday in North America and Christmas + New Year later in December/January coming up. Am I correct to assume that we need to release Avatica 1.13.0 before Calcite 1.17.0? If so,

Re: [DISCUSS] Towards Calcite 1.18

Thanks for continuing to push releases forward! Unfortunately I won't be able to volunteer to be release manager this time around, but I'll try to set aside some time to go through some PRs. On Sat, Oct 20, 2018, 02:21 Julian Hyde wrote: > OK, it's now exactly 3 months since 1.17. I think it's

Re: [DISCUSS] Towards Calcite 1.18

OK, it's now exactly 3 months since 1.17. I think it's time. I think we should aim for a first RC a week from today (Friday 26th October). Can we have a volunteer to be release manager? Also, there are lots of PRs to review and merge. Please help out with that task, committers. Julian On

Re: [DISCUSS] Towards Calcite 1.18

We’ll be sure to get PRs into the release. If you like, you can make the JIRA case depend on those 3 cases - that will remind us. (Other contributors: You can do that also, but only if you have a PR that you believe is ready to submit.) > On Sep 20, 2018, at 8:18 AM, Andrew Pilloud > wrote:

Re: [DISCUSS] Towards Calcite 1.18

Beam has a few JIRAs we'd like to see make the next release (which will enable us to replace 11k lines of code with calls to Calcite). They all have open PRs. * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2404 Accessing structured-types is not implemented by the runtime *

Re: [DISCUSS] Towards Calcite 1.18

9/25 should be the GA release of JDK 11 according to [1]. Would be good to ensure that the next release is compatible with it. We should be in good shape but would be a good release note too. 1. http://openjdk.java.net/projects/jdk/11/ Kevin Risden On Wed, Sep 19, 2018, 20:56 Francis Chuang

Re: [DISCUSS] Towards Calcite 1.18

For avatica, there are currently 6 open PRs. A few of them appear to be blocked due to incompatibilities with JDK or something else. Perhaps the situation has now changed and we can get those in for 1.13. On 20/09/2018 9:26 AM, Julian Hyde wrote: I have logged *

Re: [DISCUSS] Towards Calcite 1.18

Avatica has around 14 commits since the last release, but I think it would be good to have a release to maintain release cadence. I have been working on a script to automate most of the release in a docker container and would like to get that in for this release (if possible). On 20/09/2018

Re: [DISCUSS] Towards Calcite 1.18

I have logged * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2576 Release Avatica 1.13 * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2575 Release Calcite 1.18.0 > On Sep 19, 2018,

[DISCUSS] Towards Calcite 1.18

Calcite 1.17 was released on 20th July (2 months ago) and since then there have been almost 100 commits. Does anyone have constraints on when 1.18 should be released? (My opinion: we should aim for 3 months after 1.17, and therefore we will need an RC before 10th October.) Does anyone have