Re: Diff in Materialization views registration between Calcite 1.10 and calcite 1.12

There are two different objects associated with the view: 1) the view itself (TableScan on a materialized view) and 2) the view content (RelNode plan representing the query of the view). 1) I understand that the first object (TS on view) should be registered, as it might be part of the

Re: Diff in Materialization views registration between Calcite 1.10 and calcite 1.12

So, the question is whether materialized views need to be “registered” with the planner before they can be considered. If they are “registered” with a Volcano planner this means that they are included in equivalence classes (RelSets and RelSubsets) and canonized. A weaker form of registration

Diff in Materialization views registration between Calcite 1.10 and calcite 1.12

Moving to calcite-dev From: Remus Rusanu Date: Thursday, March 9, 2017 at 1:04 PM To: Ashutosh Chauhan , Julian Hyde Cc: "sql...@hortonworks.com" Subject: Why Calcite 1.10 is not hitting the