Just to update, my laptop does not seem to be able to mount a FAT system
for Virtualbox to run in order for me to execute the tests. If there is an
alternate way, please let me know.
Regards,
Atri
On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 1:56 AM, Julian Hyde wrote:
> Unfortunately, the
No need for major release 2.0.0, I meant next release : 1.10.0.
Thanks,
Jesús
On 9/1/16, 8:14 PM, "Jesus Camacho Rodriguez"
wrote:
>I am thinking on postponing the first RC (till next week). Monday is holiday
>in US, thus I think there is little value on
I am thinking on postponing the first RC (till next week). Monday is holiday in
US, thus I think there is little value on starting the vote tomorrow and need
to extend the vote for additional couple of days. Plus there are still a couple
of pending JIRA issues that we wanted to check in before
Atri,
I think it would be useful if you ran the full regression tests (integration
tests). They don’t get run very often and I noticed that there was an error
from the Druid suite. There might be others. You’ll need to get the VM running.
Julian
> On Aug 30, 2016, at 12:00 PM, Atri Sharma
Hi Jesus,
Please let me know where I can help in this.
On 31 Aug 2016 12:30 a.m., "Jesus Camacho Rodriguez" <
jcamachorodrig...@hortonworks.com> wrote:
> Hi team,
>
> I have updated CALCITE-1356 with a list of the issues that are still open
> and we wanted to include in 1.9.0, and their status.
Hi team,
I have updated CALCITE-1356 with a list of the issues that are still open and
we wanted to include in 1.9.0, and their status.
We plan to cut the first RC by the end of this week. Please, if you want to
include any other issue in the release, push it before then!
Thanks.
On
Thanks, Jesus. As Atri has also volunteered to help, can you work with him.
If you add issues that you would like to be in 1.9, please indicate who is
going to do the work! Obviously we’d all like the issues we logged to be fixed
as soon as possible, but as my wife always says, she’d love a
Thanks for pushing a new release Julian. If there are no objections,
I can be the release manager for 1.9.
I will log the issues that I would like to go in before the release in
CALCITE-1356. I suggest everybody does the same!
Thanks,
Jesús
On 8/24/16, 4:42 AM, "Atri Sharma"
For sure, I will be on it
On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 1:56 AM, Julian Hyde wrote:
> Unfortunately, the release manager has to be a committer. There are
> practical reasons (you need write access to several ASF systems) and legal
> ones (you are making the release on behalf of
Unfortunately, the release manager has to be a committer. There are practical
reasons (you need write access to several ASF systems) and legal ones (you are
making the release on behalf of Apache).
That said, I very much appreciate your offer to help. Could you help with the
logistics? For
It’s time to start work on Calcite release 1.9, so we can hit the “end of
August” target.
Does this timeline (end of August) still work for everyone?
Would anyone like to be release manager?
Are there any issues that people would like to get into 1.9 (and are prepared
to work on)?
It should
11 matches
Mail list logo