Re: Making Calcite release 1.9

2016-09-10 Thread Atri Sharma
Just to update, my laptop does not seem to be able to mount a FAT system for Virtualbox to run in order for me to execute the tests. If there is an alternate way, please let me know. Regards, Atri On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 1:56 AM, Julian Hyde wrote: > Unfortunately, the

Re: Making Calcite release 1.9

2016-09-01 Thread Jesus Camacho Rodriguez
No need for major release 2.0.0, I meant next release : 1.10.0. Thanks, Jesús On 9/1/16, 8:14 PM, "Jesus Camacho Rodriguez" wrote: >I am thinking on postponing the first RC (till next week). Monday is holiday >in US, thus I think there is little value on

Re: Making Calcite release 1.9

2016-09-01 Thread Jesus Camacho Rodriguez
I am thinking on postponing the first RC (till next week). Monday is holiday in US, thus I think there is little value on starting the vote tomorrow and need to extend the vote for additional couple of days. Plus there are still a couple of pending JIRA issues that we wanted to check in before

Re: Making Calcite release 1.9

2016-08-31 Thread Julian Hyde
Atri, I think it would be useful if you ran the full regression tests (integration tests). They don’t get run very often and I noticed that there was an error from the Druid suite. There might be others. You’ll need to get the VM running. Julian > On Aug 30, 2016, at 12:00 PM, Atri Sharma

Re: Making Calcite release 1.9

2016-08-30 Thread Atri Sharma
Hi Jesus, Please let me know where I can help in this. On 31 Aug 2016 12:30 a.m., "Jesus Camacho Rodriguez" < jcamachorodrig...@hortonworks.com> wrote: > Hi team, > > I have updated CALCITE-1356 with a list of the issues that are still open > and we wanted to include in 1.9.0, and their status.

Re: Making Calcite release 1.9

2016-08-30 Thread Jesus Camacho Rodriguez
Hi team, I have updated CALCITE-1356 with a list of the issues that are still open and we wanted to include in 1.9.0, and their status. We plan to cut the first RC by the end of this week. Please, if you want to include any other issue in the release, push it before then! Thanks. On

Re: Making Calcite release 1.9

2016-08-24 Thread Julian Hyde
Thanks, Jesus. As Atri has also volunteered to help, can you work with him. If you add issues that you would like to be in 1.9, please indicate who is going to do the work! Obviously we’d all like the issues we logged to be fixed as soon as possible, but as my wife always says, she’d love a

Re: Making Calcite release 1.9

2016-08-24 Thread Jesus Camacho Rodriguez
Thanks for pushing a new release Julian. If there are no objections, I can be the release manager for 1.9. I will log the issues that I would like to go in before the release in CALCITE-1356. I suggest everybody does the same! Thanks, Jesús On 8/24/16, 4:42 AM, "Atri Sharma"

Re: Making Calcite release 1.9

2016-08-23 Thread Atri Sharma
For sure, I will be on it On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 1:56 AM, Julian Hyde wrote: > Unfortunately, the release manager has to be a committer. There are > practical reasons (you need write access to several ASF systems) and legal > ones (you are making the release on behalf of

Re: Making Calcite release 1.9

2016-08-23 Thread Julian Hyde
Unfortunately, the release manager has to be a committer. There are practical reasons (you need write access to several ASF systems) and legal ones (you are making the release on behalf of Apache). That said, I very much appreciate your offer to help. Could you help with the logistics? For

Making Calcite release 1.9

2016-08-23 Thread Julian Hyde
It’s time to start work on Calcite release 1.9, so we can hit the “end of August” target. Does this timeline (end of August) still work for everyone? Would anyone like to be release manager? Are there any issues that people would like to get into 1.9 (and are prepared to work on)? It should