Should have been "properly fix this".
Sorry,
Pascal
Am 19.06.2018 um 19:27 schrieb Pascal Schumacher:
Hi everybody,
after the recent updated to Mina 2.0.19 four camel-xmpp tests are broken:
Hi everybody,
after the recent updated to Mina 2.0.19 four camel-xmpp tests are broken:
https://builds.apache.org/view/C/view/Apache%20Camel/job/Camel/job/master/411/testReport/junit/org.apache.camel.component.xmpp/
I can replicated this locally. Reverting commit
Hi,
I am done with CAMEL-6840. This will possibly resolve CAMEL-5599.
I think lately Willem has had one comment. I think it is addressed already.
If you have more, please let me know and we can have it merged soon.
Thanks,
Önder
On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 11:02 AM Onder SEZGIN wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I
Github user oscerd closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/camel/pull/2386
---
GitHub user gsudharsan opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/camel/pull/2386
CAMEL-12588 Fix Improvement
AggregateProcessor doStop() method changed to call shutdown() instead of
shutdownNow()
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$
Github user gsudharsan closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/camel/pull/2385
---
GitHub user gsudharsan opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/camel/pull/2385
CAMEL-12588 - Improving the fix
doStop() method now shuts down the timeoutCheckerExecutorService pool too
Improvment - used shutdown instead of shutdownNow
You can merge this pull request
Github user oscerd closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/camel/pull/2384
---
GitHub user gsudharsan opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/camel/pull/2384
Cleanup TimeOutChecker threads
When a Aggregator route is stopped, only the AggregateRecoveryChecker
threads are stopped and not the AggregateTimeoutChecker threads. They keep
lingering around.
Not necessary. We can eventually wrap non OSGi-fied dependencies.
Inviato da Yahoo Mail su Android
Il mar, 19 giu, 2018 alle 12:42, Rafal Korytkowski
ha scritto: Hi Claus,
Thanks a lot for your guidance!
I've got one follow up question. Is it a strict requirement for component's
Hi Claus,
Thanks a lot for your guidance!
I've got one follow up question. Is it a strict requirement for component's
dependencies to be OSGI-fied?
On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 9:01 AM Claus Ibsen wrote:
> Hi Rafal
>
> Welcome to the Camel community.
> It sounds great with a camel-teiid component.
11 matches
Mail list logo