Hi
Okay so the blog post is short and to the point. Thanks for the
feedback and corrections.
I have merged it so we can get the word out on the street.
On Tue, Sep 21, 2021 at 9:45 AM Claus Ibsen wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> I created a draft for a blog post about dropping java 8
> htt
om: Claus Ibsen
> Sent: 21 September 2021 13:15
> To: dev
> Subject: Re: Dropping Java 8
>
>
> EXTERNAL SENDER: Do not click any links or open any attachments unless you
> trust the sender and know the content is safe.
> EXPÉDITEUR EXTERNE:Ne cliquez sur aucun lien et
-
From: Claus Ibsen
Sent: 21 September 2021 13:15
To: dev
Subject: Re: Dropping Java 8
EXTERNAL SENDER: Do not click any links or open any attachments unless you
trust the sender and know the content is safe.
EXPÉDITEUR EXTERNE:Ne cliquez sur aucun lien et n’ouvrez aucune pièce
jointe à
LGTM
Thanks,
Regards
JB
> Le 21 sept. 2021 à 09:45, Claus Ibsen a écrit :
>
> Hi
>
> I created a draft for a blog post about dropping java 8
> https://github.com/apache/camel-website/pull/627
>
> Feedback and comments welcome
>
> On Mon, Sep 20, 2021
LGTM, just added some minor comments.
Thanks,
Gregor
On Tue, Sep 21, 2021 at 9:45 AM Claus Ibsen wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> I created a draft for a blog post about dropping java 8
> https://github.com/apache/camel-website/pull/627
>
> Feedback and comments welcome
>
> On Mo
Looks good to me. Thanks!
Il giorno mar 21 set 2021 alle ore 09:45 Claus Ibsen
ha scritto:
> Hi
>
> I created a draft for a blog post about dropping java 8
> https://github.com/apache/camel-website/pull/627
>
> Feedback and comments welcome
>
> On Mon, Sep 20, 2021
Hi
I created a draft for a blog post about dropping java 8
https://github.com/apache/camel-website/pull/627
Feedback and comments welcome
On Mon, Sep 20, 2021 at 10:14 AM Claus Ibsen wrote:
>
> On Sat, Sep 18, 2021 at 9:44 AM Zoran Regvart wrote:
> >
> > Hi Claus,
> >
On Sat, Sep 18, 2021 at 9:44 AM Zoran Regvart wrote:
>
> Hi Claus,
> it should be relatively easy to add requirements to the front matter of
> release notes and have those displayed on the download/release pages.
> We do have a dependencies page[1] in the user manual, so we need a change
>
Hi Claus,
it should be relatively easy to add requirements to the front matter of release
notes and have those displayed on the download/release pages.
We do have a dependencies page[1] in the user manual, so we need a change there
as well. Tricky bit about that is that we publish a single
Hi
Okay so it seems we have consensus to drop JDK8 after the next LTS
release (Camel 3.14) by end of this year.
This means that in 2022 we have dropped JDK8 in Camel.
I think we can put out a blog post on the Camel website about this.
Zoran. I wonder if we can get the download page to display a
+1
Great that we can soon use Java 11 API like List.of(...) to write simpler
code!
On Mon, Sep 6, 2021 at 4:25 PM Alexandre Gallice
wrote:
> I think these days developers typically have both JDK 8 and JDK 11
> deployed to production. We must be behind the adoption bump of JDK 11.
> So a 2 year
I think these days developers typically have both JDK 8 and JDK 11
deployed to production. We must be behind the adoption bump of JDK 11.
So a 2 year LTS is fine.
+1
On Mon, Sep 6, 2021 at 3:45 AM Zheng Feng wrote:
> +1
>
> On Fri, Sep 3, 2021 at 6:26 PM Andrea Cosentino wrote:
>
> > Hello
+1
On Fri, Sep 3, 2021 at 6:26 PM Andrea Cosentino wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> More and more third party libraries are starting to drop JDK 8 in favor of
> JDK 11 (last one I've found is Optaplanner).
>
> I think we need to define a release where we totally drop Java 8 Support
> and start to build
+1
Time to move on!
Regards,
Omar
On Sun, Sep 5, 2021 at 1:14 PM zineb bendhiba
wrote:
> +1.
>
> Zineb
>
> > Le 4 sept. 2021 à 17:31, Otavio Rodolfo Piske a
> écrit :
> >
> > +1. I think it makes sense too.
> >
> > Kind regards
> >
> >> On Fri, Sep 3, 2021 at 3:17 PM Andrea Cosentino
>
+1.
Zineb
> Le 4 sept. 2021 à 17:31, Otavio Rodolfo Piske a écrit :
>
> +1. I think it makes sense too.
>
> Kind regards
>
>> On Fri, Sep 3, 2021 at 3:17 PM Andrea Cosentino wrote:
>>
>> +1 from my side. It think the timing would be perfect, JDK 17 is behind the
>> corner.
>>
>> Il
+1. I think it makes sense too.
Kind regards
On Fri, Sep 3, 2021 at 3:17 PM Andrea Cosentino wrote:
> +1 from my side. It think the timing would be perfect, JDK 17 is behind the
> corner.
>
> Il giorno ven 3 set 2021 alle ore 15:16 Claus Ibsen >
> ha scritto:
>
> > Hi
> >
> > Yeah and also
+1 good time to start doing that
> On Sep 3, 2021, at 5:18 AM, Andrea Cosentino wrote:
>
> Hello all,
>
> More and more third party libraries are starting to drop JDK 8 in favor of
> JDK 11 (last one I've found is Optaplanner).
>
> I think we need to define a release where we totally drop
+1 from my side. It think the timing would be perfect, JDK 17 is behind the
corner.
Il giorno ven 3 set 2021 alle ore 15:16 Claus Ibsen
ha scritto:
> Hi
>
> Yeah and also some of the sub projects are JDK11 only like camel-k,
> camel-quarkus
> And there are some work with the compiled simple
Hi
Yeah and also some of the sub projects are JDK11 only like camel-k,
camel-quarkus
And there are some work with the compiled simple that is stalled due
to JDK8 in the core.
If we are not too fast, we could maybe let the next LTS be the last
JDK8 and then have it supported for 2 years instead
Hi,
It makes sense to me.
+1
Regards
JB
> Le 3 sept. 2021 à 12:18, Andrea Cosentino a écrit :
>
> Hello all,
>
> More and more third party libraries are starting to drop JDK 8 in favor of
> JDK 11 (last one I've found is Optaplanner).
>
> I think we need to define a release where we
Hello all,
More and more third party libraries are starting to drop JDK 8 in favor of
JDK 11 (last one I've found is Optaplanner).
I think we need to define a release where we totally drop Java 8 Support
and start to build and release with Java 11 only.
What are your thoughts?
21 matches
Mail list logo
