Thanks for the pointer.
-Original Message-
From: Claus Ibsen [mailto:claus.ib...@gmail.com]
Sent: Dienstag, 19. Juli 2016 13:08
To: dev <dev@camel.apache.org>
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Attachment Headers
Just edit the release notes at
http://camel.apache.org/camel-2180-release.htm
should be
>> updated with the commit itself.
>>
>> I guess it might be a good idea to write a heads up mail to this list.
>> Anything else I have forgotten?
>>
>> Best regards
>> Stephan
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Clau
Hi Claus,
How do I provide input for the 2.18 release notes?
Best regards
Stephan
-Original Message-
From: Claus Ibsen [mailto:claus.ib...@gmail.com]
Sent: Dienstag, 19. Juli 2016 11:56
To: dev <dev@camel.apache.org>
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Attachment Headers
Hi
Sounds good.
J
That can be done in GIthub too. Since that supports.
-Original Message-
From: Bharath Kumar Champalal
Sent: Tuesday, July 19, 2016 3:39 PM
To: dev <dev@camel.apache.org>
Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] Attachment Headers
That would be gr8.
Can we have Doxygen as an option
They support Ma
That would be gr8.
Can we have Doxygen as an option
They support Markdown, which looks nice.
-Original Message-
From: Claus Ibsen [mailto:claus.ib...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 19, 2016 3:26 PM
To: dev <dev@camel.apache.org>
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Attachment Headers
Hi
> Stephan
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Claus Ibsen [mailto:claus.ib...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Freitag, 15. Juli 2016 12:14
> To: dev <dev@camel.apache.org>
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Attachment Headers
>
> Hi
>
> Thanks for bringing this up to attention.
>
. Anything
else I have forgotten?
Best regards
Stephan
-Original Message-
From: Claus Ibsen [mailto:claus.ib...@gmail.com]
Sent: Freitag, 15. Juli 2016 12:14
To: dev <dev@camel.apache.org>
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Attachment Headers
Hi
Thanks for bringing this up to attention.
I rea
Hi
Thanks for bringing this up to attention.
I read your proposals and very good with the pros/cons of them.
Yeah I also think its better to go with #3 so we get a better solution
for this which we carry forward for Camel 3, and have @deprecated the
old api on 2.x.
+1 for option #3.
On Mon,
Hi,
Unfortunately I have received no feedback about this so far.
If nobody objects I will go on with the implementation for option 3 and check
that into the master branch sometime next week.
If anybody here has doubts about this please speak up!
Best regards
Stephan
-Original
