Re: Released BOM should have hardcoded camel version

2024-03-13 Thread Matt Pavlovich
Hi Claus, Thanks, good info. I’ll follow the same for ActiveMQ. -Matt Pavlovich > On Mar 13, 2024, at 1:29 AM, Claus Ibsen wrote: > > Hi > > The BOM should use hardcoded versions as the BOM is for a given version, eg > 4.5.0 should be 4.5.0 versions. > That is also what everyone else is

Re: Released BOM should have hardcoded camel version

2024-03-13 Thread Claus Ibsen
Hi The BOM should use hardcoded versions as the BOM is for a given version, eg 4.5.0 should be 4.5.0 versions. That is also what everyone else is doing also. If you want to use a different Camel version you refer to that BOM version, i.e. 4.6.0 and so on. For example SB has 3.2.3 hardcoded in

Re: Released BOM should have hardcoded camel version

2024-03-12 Thread Matt Pavlovich
Hi Claus- Question: I’m planning to update some BOMs for other projects and was wondering if there were other reasons to use a hard-coded value vs a property? I agree, using ${project.version} is not going to work for a bom. Would using a declared property such as ${apache.camel.version} have

Re: Released BOM should have hardcoded camel version

2024-03-11 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
Hi Claus Good catch and thanks for the fix. Regards JB On Sun, Mar 10, 2024 at 1:34 PM Claus Ibsen wrote: > > Hi > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-20413 > > The BOM we release for both core and SB have > > > org.apache.camel > camel-api > ${project.version} > > > But they