+1
Regards,
Venkata Ramana G
On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 7:25 AM, Erlu Chen wrote:
> +1
>
> Regards.
> Chenerlu.
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context: http://apache-carbondata-dev-
> mailing-list-archive.1130556.n5.nabble.com/VOTE-Apache-
>
Ashok Kumar created CARBONDATA-1282:
---
Summary: Query with large no of column gives codegeneration issue
Key: CARBONDATA-1282
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CARBONDATA-1282
Project:
xuchuanyin created CARBONDATA-1281:
--
Summary: Disk hotspot found during data loading
Key: CARBONDATA-1281
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CARBONDATA-1281
Project: CarbonData
Hi Jacky
You are right, spark 1.5 integration code is almost same as 1.6, but still
has some difference.
Please find the below reasons for proposing remove spark 1.5 integration:
1.This proposal doesn't impact released carbondata version works with spark
1.5. What i am proposing that from 1.2.0
+1
Regards.
Chenerlu.
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-carbondata-dev-mailing-list-archive.1130556.n5.nabble.com/VOTE-Apache-CarbonData-1-1-1-RC1-release-tp17531p17715.html
Sent from the Apache CarbonData Dev Mailing List archive mailing list archive
at Nabble.com.
I think it is ok to support spark1.5 without IUD currently.
If users upgrade spark version to spark2.1 or spark2.2 in the future, We can
remove this if less user use spark1.5.
Is there any special reason which lead to this remove ?
Regards.
Chenerlu.
--
View this message in context:
+1
在2017年07月09日 13:43,Liang Chen 写道:
+1(binding)
Regards
Liang
2017-07-09 1:22 GMT+08:00 Jacky Li :
> +1 (binding)
>
> > 在 2017年7月8日,上午7:46,bill.zhou 写道:
> >
> > +1
> >
> >
> > Liang Chen-2 wrote
> >> Hi
> >>
> >> I submit the Apache CarbonData 1.1.1