Re: [Discussion] Support pre-aggregate table to improve OLAP performance

2017-10-15 Thread Jacky Li
Hi Lu Cao, In my previous experience on “cube” engine, no matter it is ROLAP or MOLAP, it is something above SQL layer, because it not only need user to establish cube schema by transform metadata from datawarehouse star schema but also the engine defines its own query language like MDX, and

Re: [DISCUSSION] Support only spark 2 in carbon 1.3.0

2017-10-15 Thread 北斗七
+1 2017-10-15 21:19 GMT+08:00 Lu Cao : > Sure, will create the Jira ticket. > > Thanks, > Lionel > > On Sun, Oct 15, 2017 at 2:29 PM, Liang Chen > wrote: > > > Hi lionel > > > > As per mailing list discussion result, no objection. so can you create

Re: [Discussion] Support pre-aggregate table to improve OLAP performance

2017-10-15 Thread Lu Cao
Hi Jacky, If user want to create a cube on main table, does he/she have to create multiple pre-aggregate tables? It will be a heavy workload to write so many CTAS commands. If user only need create a few pre-agg tables, current carbon already can support this requirement, user can create table

Re: [Discussion] Support pre-aggregate table to improve OLAP performance

2017-10-15 Thread Jacky Li
Hi Liang, For alter table, data update/delete, and delete segment, they are the same. So I write in document “ User can manually perform this operation and rebuild pre-aggregate table as update scenario” User need to drop the associated aggregate table and perform alter table, or data

Re: [Discussion] Support pre-aggregate table to improve OLAP performance

2017-10-15 Thread Liang Chen
Hi Jacky Thanks for you started this discussion, this is a great feature in carbondata. One question: For sub_jar "Handle alter table scenarios for aggregation table", please give more detail info. Just i viewed the pdf attachment as below, looks no need to do any handles for agg table if users

Re: [DISCUSSION] Support only spark 2 in carbon 1.3.0

2017-10-15 Thread Liang Chen
Hi lionel As per mailing list discussion result, no objection. so can you create an umbrella jira to remove spark 1.5 & 1.6 code in 1.3.0. Regards Liang lionel061201 wrote > Hi community, > Currently we have three spark related module in carbondata(spark 1.5, 1.6, > 2.1), the project has