Raghunandan S created CARBONDATA-958:
Summary: Schema modified time not updated in modifiedtime.mdt when
dictionary column is updated to no-dictionary column due to high cardinality
Key: CARBONDATA-958
URL
+1
On 11-Mar-2017 7:21 AM, "Ravindra Pesala" wrote:
Hi All,
I guess it is time to remove the kettle flow from Carbondata loading. Now
there are two flows to load the data and becomes difficult to maintain the
code.Bug fixing or any feature implementation needs to be done in both the
places so i
Raghunandan S created CARBONDATA-731:
Summary: Enhance and correct quick start and installation guides
Key: CARBONDATA-731
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CARBONDATA-731
Project
un, Feb 5, 2017 at 4:49 PM, Raghunandan S <
carbondatacontributi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Dear sanoj,
> Pls refer to
> http://apache-carbondata-mailing-list-archive.1130556.
> n5.nabble.com/Dictionary-file-is-locked-for-updation-td5076.html
>
> Let me know if this thread didn&
Dear sanoj,
Pls refer to
http://apache-carbondata-mailing-list-archive.1130556.n5.nabble.com/Dictionary-file-is-locked-for-updation-td5076.html
Let me know if this thread didn't address your problem.
Regards
On 05-Feb-2017 5:22 PM, "Sanoj M George" wrote:
Hi All,
I am getting below error whi
Raghunandan S created CARBONDATA-581:
Summary: Node locality cannot be obtained in group by queries
Key: CARBONDATA-581
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CARBONDATA-581
Project
Raghunandan S created CARBONDATA-579:
Summary: Handle Fortify issues
Key: CARBONDATA-579
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CARBONDATA-579
Project: CarbonData
Issue Type
Dear anurag,
Not required to be stored as int.if we validate the data based on the
schema definition would suffice
On Mon, 26 Dec 2016 at 1:10 PM, Anurag Srivastava
wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> I am working on resolving jira bug
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CARBONDATA-370
> While resol
I suggest we have a parallel implementation by removing kettle and when it
stabilises we make kettle deprecated and then remove it
On Mon, 26 Dec 2016 at 1:25 PM, Liang Chen wrote:
> Hi
>
> Thanks you started a good discussion.
>
> For 1 and 2, i agree. In 1.0.0 version, will support it.
> For 3
+1
Good idea to avoid gc overhead.we need to be careful in clearing memory
after use
On Tue, 13 Dec 2016 at 2:17 PM, Kumar Vishal
wrote:
> There are lots of gc when carbon is processing more number of records
> during query, which is impacting carbon query performance.To solve this gc
> problem h
How is this different from partitioning?
On Sun, 27 Nov 2016 at 11:21 PM, Ravindra Pesala
wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Bucketing concept is based on the hash partition the bucketed column as per
> configured bucket numbers. Records with same bucketed column always goes to
> the same same bucket. Physical
+1
On Thu, 24 Nov 2016 at 2:30 PM, Liang Chen wrote:
> Hi
>
> Ya, good proposal.
> CarbonData 0.x version integrate with spark 1.x, and the load data
> solution
> of 0.x version is using kettle.
> CarbonData 1.x version integrate with spark 2.x, the load data solution of
> 1.x version will not u
I vote for pooposal 1
On Thu, 17 Nov 2016 at 12:04 AM, Liang Chen wrote:
> Hi all
>
> Please vote the below proposals or advise other better proposal on building
> thrift files.
>
>
>
> ---
>
> CarbonData is file
I agree with jihong.carbon need to have smart logic to decide
On Wed, 28 Sep 2016 at 6:12 AM, Jihong Ma wrote:
> Ideally this should be an internal improvement, not necessarily exposing
> it as an config option, Carbon should be able to smartly figure out if
> leveraging index is beneficial or st
+1
I suggest we separate the tools as usability and Dev/debugging tools
Take up the usability tools with highest priority
On Mon, 8 Aug 2016 at 10:32 AM, Venkata Gollamudi
wrote:
> +1
> These list looks like both user needed tools for maintenance and dev tools.
> Mostly they can be separated.
>
15 matches
Mail list logo
