Re: Getting cassandra into central

2010-12-30 Thread Brian Fox
I manually added the Cassandra deployer group. As far as repository.a.o is concerned, you're a committer now ;-) On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 5:42 PM, Stephen Connolly wrote: > Brian, > OK so I have Cassandra set up for deployment but I am getting 401's when I > try to deploy (as I am not a committer)

Re: [VOTE] 7.0 rc4

2010-12-30 Thread Jonathan Ellis
+1 to the release and to 24h On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 2:08 PM, Eric Evans wrote: > > It looked like RC3 would be the last before a stable release, we were > looking so good, but a couple of deal-breakers[1] cropped up recently. > I propose the following artifacts for release as 0.7.0-rc4. > > SVN:

Re: Getting cassandra into central

2010-12-30 Thread Stephen Connolly
Brian, OK so I have Cassandra set up for deployment but I am getting 401's when I try to deploy (as I am not a committer) can we set things up so I can stage... I don't need to promote unless the Cassandra PMC are happy letting me promote. Thanks, -Stephen Note: I have included dev@cassandr

Re: [SOLVED] Re: 0.7RC1 local_quorum -> TimedOutException

2010-12-30 Thread Jonathan Ellis
Hmm, interesting. You're right that it's a bug; those two are supposed to be equivalent. On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 4:02 PM, Thor Carpenter wrote: > So, I found a solution, but I think there is a (trivial) bug. > > The broken keyspace: > > create keyspace KeyspaceDC1 with >    replication_factor =

[SOLVED] Re: 0.7RC1 local_quorum -> TimedOutException

2010-12-30 Thread Thor Carpenter
So, I found a solution, but I think there is a (trivial) bug. The broken keyspace: create keyspace KeyspaceDC1 with replication_factor = 1 and placement_strategy = 'org.apache.cassandra.locator.NetworkTopologyStrategy' and strategy_options = [{DC1:1, DC2:0}]; The fixed keyspace: cr

Re: [VOTE] 7.0 rc4

2010-12-30 Thread Gary Dusbabek
+1 on the RC. +1 on the 24hr vote. On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 14:08, Eric Evans wrote: > > It looked like RC3 would be the last before a stable release, we were > looking so good, but a couple of deal-breakers[1] cropped up recently. > I propose the following artifacts for release as 0.7.0-rc4. > >

Re: [VOTE] 7.0 rc4

2010-12-30 Thread Brandon Williams
On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 2:08 PM, Eric Evans wrote: > > It looked like RC3 would be the last before a stable release, we were > looking so good, but a couple of deal-breakers[1] cropped up recently. > I propose the following artifacts for release as 0.7.0-rc4. > > SVN: > > https://svn.apache.org/r

[VOTE] 7.0 rc4

2010-12-30 Thread Eric Evans
It looked like RC3 would be the last before a stable release, we were looking so good, but a couple of deal-breakers[1] cropped up recently. I propose the following artifacts for release as 0.7.0-rc4. SVN: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cassandra/branches/cassandra-0@r1053977 0.7.0-rc4 arti

Re: Avro RPC?

2010-12-30 Thread Jeff Hodges
I think I can help answer that. Avro would be nice because a) it's going to be part of the core infrastructure of Hadoop and Hadoop is how most of our long-term stored data is accessed and b) the schema model is really nice (both keeping the schema in the file with the serialized data and having a

RE: Avro RPC?

2010-12-30 Thread David Dabbs
Ryan, would you mind pointing us to any doc or history articulating why you feel Avro is preferable for "data storage and anywhere else we currently do custom serialization"? Your experiences would be valuable input for work I hope to soon begin. Thank you, David -Original Message- Fr