I'm a little confused. What specific usage of an Apache mark is being
requested here? Any specific permissions granted to use Apache marks to
refer to third party's goods, including "Cassandra", should include
tradema...@apache.org on any plans or decisions.
Hopefully PMC members are aware o
I'll drop and restage the artifacts for maven central when I get a chance
- Stephen
---
Sent from my Android phone, so random spelling mistakes, random nonsense
words and other nonsense are a direct result of using swype to type on the
screen
On 28 Jan 2011 20:30, "Eric Evans" wrote:
>
> CASSAND
On Thu, 2011-01-27 at 12:18 -0600, Eric Evans wrote:
> SVN:
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cassandra/branches/cassandra-0.6@r1064231
> 0.6.11 artifacts: http://people.apache.org/~eevans
>
> I've been asked to expedite the release process, so if no one is in
> disagreement, we can call this one
CASSANDRA-2058[1] has landed in 0.7, so let's give this another shot. I
propose the following for release as 0.7.1.
SVN:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cassandra/branches/cassandra-0.7@r1064845
0.7.1 artifacts: http://people.apache.org/~eevans
The vote will be open for 72 hours.
[1]: https:
On Wed, 2011-01-26 at 22:04 -0600, Jonathan Ellis wrote:
> We should fix https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-2058
> first. (As of this writing the 0.6 version of the patch has been
> tested, but the 0.7 version has not yet.)
So we'll count this as a veto and close this vote.
#2058 h
adding shane.
shane, am I being overly cautious or have we more fun here
ps I am only on the maven pmc, so I cannot follow if you jump to
priv...@cassandra.apache.org
- Stephen
---
Sent from my Android phone, so random spelling mistakes, random nonsense
words and other nonsense are a direct res
On Fri, 2011-01-28 at 19:25 +, ant elder wrote:
> -1. This isn't a veto yet but I've read CASSANDRA-1997 and
> CASSANDRA-1805 but still have no real understanding of why the
> contribution of this maven plugin is being rejected and told to go do
> it somewhere out of the ASF. Why isn't this wan
On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 7:07 PM, Stephen Connolly
wrote:
> Since there does not seem to be any desire to accept CASSANDRA-1997
>
> Can the PMC vote to approve the use of the Cassandra mark by the
> mojo.codehaus.org project for the Cassandra Maven Plugin
>
> +1 Approve
> 0 don't care
> -1 Veto
>
>
On Fri, 2011-01-28 at 19:07 +, Stephen Connolly wrote:
> Since there does not seem to be any desire to accept CASSANDRA-1997
>
> Can the PMC vote to approve the use of the Cassandra mark by the
> mojo.codehaus.org project for the Cassandra Maven Plugin
I don't understand why you'd need permis
+1
On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 1:07 PM, Stephen Connolly <
stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Since there does not seem to be any desire to accept CASSANDRA-1997
>
> Can the PMC vote to approve the use of the Cassandra mark by the
> mojo.codehaus.org project for the Cassandra Maven Plugin
>
>
+1
On Jan 28, 2011 1:07 PM, "Stephen Connolly"
wrote:
Since there does not seem to be any desire to accept CASSANDRA-1997
Can the PMC vote to approve the use of the Cassandra mark by the
mojo.codehaus.org project for the Cassandra Maven Plugin
+1 Approve
0 don't care
-1 Veto
72 hours
PMC vot
Since there does not seem to be any desire to accept CASSANDRA-1997
Can the PMC vote to approve the use of the Cassandra mark by the
mojo.codehaus.org project for the Cassandra Maven Plugin
+1 Approve
0 don't care
-1 Veto
72 hours
PMC votes only
-Stephen
ok this is in a random order.
the maven pmc is having a lot of discussions over the use of the maven mark,
so I am some what aware of things that we have been told...
the plugin is specific to cassandra, so it does not belong at maven.
if the group id is not org.apache.cassandra then it makes th
13 matches
Mail list logo
