Eric Evans eev...@rackspace.com writes:
(Hopefully )for the next version, we'll replace Thrift with a dedicated
protocol, one that eliminates the Thrift dependency, and more
importantly, implements streaming. This should be transparent to
applications for the most part though.
pardon my
On Thu, 2011-03-31 at 13:56 +0200, Bjorn Borud wrote:
(Hopefully )for the next version, we'll replace Thrift with a
dedicated protocol, one that eliminates the Thrift dependency, and
more importantly, implements streaming. This should be transparent
to applications for the most part
In response to the apparent mass confusion about nodetool repair that
became evidence in the thread:
http://www.mail-archive.com/user@cassandra.apache.org/msg11755.html
I started looking around to see what is actually claimed about repair.
I found that the Datastax docs:
I would be +1 on this. We need a good way to develop against
snapshots. Thanks for your work here Stephen.
Stu
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 5:35 AM, Stephen Connolly
stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com wrote:
Just an FYI.
I have the required fixes for Maven ANT Tasks in place:
I couldn't agree more, the DataStax docs (try saying that 3 times fast) are
definitely the most complete and user-friendly source for end-users, while
the wiki contains a lot more detailed information on the architecture and
internals.
Ideally, I'd like to see the user docs be in a place that the
On Thu, 2011-03-31 at 18:57 +0100, Nick Telford wrote:
I don't think the Wiki is the right place for community maintained
user docs; it doesn't have the necessary structure.
The wiki is great at what wikis are great at, lowering the barrier to
contribution. There is a lot of good stuff (some
I agree that wikis are great for contribution; what I meant was that they're
rather poor at organising information for ease of discovery, especially by
new users.
I still like the idea of some more structured docs being managed by the
community though.
On 1 April 2011 02:16, Eric Evans
