Re: Broader community involvement in 4.0 (WAS Re: Rough roadmap for 4.0)

My 2 cents. I'm wondering is it a good idea to have some high level goals for the major release? For example, the goals could be something like: 1. Improve the scalability/reliability/performance by X%. 2. Add Y new features (feature A, B, C, D...). 3. Fix Z known issues (issue A, B, C, D...). I

Re: Rough roadmap for 4.0

Also https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-12676 -- Jeff Jirsa > On Nov 4, 2016, at 11:51 AM, Jason Brown wrote: > > +1 to epaxos > >> On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 11:40 AM, Jonathan Haddad wrote: >> >> epaxos would be nice, it's been about

Re: [VOTE] Close client-...@cassandra.apache.org mailing list

+1 (non-binding) On 2016-11-07 12:52 (-0800), sankalp kohli wrote: > +1 > > On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 10:19 AM, Brandon Williams wrote: > > > As the moderator of this list, +1. It was more helpful in the thrift days > > (where I built a client, and

[GitHub] cassandra pull request #79: Correct Spelling Errors in JavaDoc for IEndPoint...

Github user asfgit closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/cassandra/pull/79 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is

Re: Review of Cassandra actions

On Sun, Nov 6, 2016 at 3:42 PM, Mark Thomas wrote: > A number of posts from a variety of authors on this topic in recent days > have fallen short of the standard expected on an Apache list. Trying to > correct that without causing the situation to escalate is hard. The last >

Re: Broader community involvement in 4.0 (WAS Re: Rough roadmap for 4.0)

Recently there was another discussion on documentation and comments [1] On one hand, documentation and comments will help newcomers to familiarise themselves with the codebase. On the other - one may get up to speed by reading the code and adding some docs. Such things may require less oversight

Re: Wiki edit

On 11/06/2016 11:59 PM, Vladimir Yudovin wrote: > Please add user winguzone to Wiki, Done. Thanks! -- Michael

Re: [VOTE] Close client-...@cassandra.apache.org mailing list

As the moderator of this list, +1. It was more helpful in the thrift days (where I built a client, and thus became the moderator) but is practically useless in the cql world. On Sun, Nov 6, 2016 at 11:11 PM, Jeff Jirsa wrote: > There exists a nearly unused mailing list,

Re: [VOTE] Close client-...@cassandra.apache.org mailing list

+1 On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 6:11 PM, Jeff Jirsa wrote: > There exists a nearly unused mailing list, client-...@cassandra.apache.org > [0]. > > This is a summary of the email threads over the past 12 months on that list: > > 1) ApacheCon Seville CFP Close notice > 2) Datastax

Re: Wiki admin

Done. On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 9:37 AM, Michael Shuler wrote: > If someone could set the user MichaelShuler as admin, I can help with > user requests, such as the the current request on the list to add > winguzone. > > -- > Michael >

Re: Broader community involvement in 4.0 (WAS Re: Rough roadmap for 4.0)

Agreed. --  AY On 7 November 2016 at 16:38:07, Jeff Jirsa (jeff.ji...@crowdstrike.com) wrote: ‘Accepted’ JIRA status seems useful, but would encourage something more explicit like ‘Concept Accepted’ or similar to denote that the concept is agreed upon, but the actual patch itself may not be

Re: Broader community involvement in 4.0 (WAS Re: Rough roadmap for 4.0)

‘Accepted’ JIRA status seems useful, but would encourage something more explicit like ‘Concept Accepted’ or similar to denote that the concept is agreed upon, but the actual patch itself may not be accepted yet. /bikeshed. On 11/7/16, 2:56 AM, "Ben Slater" wrote:

Re: Moderation

On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 11:57 AM, Chris Mattmann wrote: > Yet you act like it's volunteer time that's preventing moderating a message > through in 12 hours. Here it is again, 12 hours. If we have a 12 hour SLA on moderation, then you can remove me as a moderator; I can't do

Re: Moderation

On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 11:51 AM, Gary Dusbabek wrote: > I'm beginning to wonder if I'm the only one with moderator privs. Any other > committer/PMCs interested? You are not. > Sorry, it's a chore to begin with and I've been traveling this week. No need to be sorry. --

Re: Moderation

On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 11:44 AM, Chris Mattmann wrote: > So seriously, we're going to send now 4 emails talking about what a user of > Apache Cassandra and possible community member could have done right or > better or sooner, or that there is no time limit to moderating

Re: [VOTE] Close client-...@cassandra.apache.org mailing list

+1 Thanks, Christopher Licata Senior Software Engineer Game Changers Card Rewards 718.916.8940 On 11/7/16, 10:29 AM, "Michael Shuler" wrote: 1) ApacheCon Seville CFP Close notice 2) Datastax .NET driver question 3)

[GitHub] cassandra issue #79: Correct Spelling Errors in JavaDoc for IEndPointSnitch

Github user cmlicata commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cassandra/pull/79 Removed correction of datacenter to data center @michaelsembwever. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project

Re: DataStax role in Cassandra and the ASF

Again. If the PMC fails to bring board (and trademark) feedback to the community it is not a failing of the board. Board minutes are available. Review comments and actions over the last 12 months or so. --- Twitter: @rgardler From: Jeremy Hanna

Wiki admin

If someone could set the user MichaelShuler as admin, I can help with user requests, such as the the current request on the list to add winguzone. -- Michael

Re: [VOTE] Close client-...@cassandra.apache.org mailing list

+1 On 11/06/2016 11:11 PM, Jeff Jirsa wrote: > There exists a nearly unused mailing list, client-...@cassandra.apache.org > [0]. > > This is a summary of the email threads over the past 12 months on that list: > > 1) ApacheCon Seville CFP Close notice > 2) Datastax .NET driver question > 3)

Re: Broader community involvement in 4.0 (WAS Re: Rough roadmap for 4.0)

Thanks Dave. The shepherd concept sounds a lot like I had in mind (and a better name). One other thing I noted from the Mesos process - they have an “Accepted” jira status that comes after open and means “at least one Mesos developer thought that the ideas proposed in the issue are worth pursuing

Re: Review of Cassandra actions

Hi Mark, Thanks, that was a calm and diplomatic email. recognise where they might need to apologise I will start the ball rolling here, as I have not always been generous in my interpretations of others' actions, and have certainly contributed to escalation. But I wonder if you would also

Re: DataStax and Cassandra

Hi, On a personal note, I’d like to thank those in this weekend’s threads who have > tried to de-escalate tensions rather than inflame them. I agree. Thanks. Let's try to all learn from that, please. I believe we can disagree politely and respectfully. And we must do so. We can still express

Re: Moderation

Because of the way we are structured from an operations point of view or is necessary to have s commit bit to be a PMC member. However, that doesn't mean one needs to commit code. A good PMC member looks after the health of the community. They do not necessarily write code. We have foundation