Personally I don’t mind dropping support for previsous java versions.
On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 6:33 AM J. D. Jordan
wrote:
> +1 for “Option 3: both 8 + 11” it shouldn’t be too hard to maintain code
> wise, and leaves people’s options open.
>
> -Jeremiah
>
> > On May 25, 2018, at 6:31 AM, Robert S
+1 for “Option 3: both 8 + 11” it shouldn’t be too hard to maintain code wise,
and leaves people’s options open.
-Jeremiah
> On May 25, 2018, at 6:31 AM, Robert Stupp wrote:
>
> I'd like to bring up the C*/Java discussion again. It's been a while since
> we've discussed this.
>
> To me it so
I'd like to bring up the C*/Java discussion again. It's been a while
since we've discussed this.
To me it sounds like there's still the question about which version(s)
of Java we want to support beginning with C* 4.0.
I assume, that it's legit (and probably very necessary) to assume that
Ope