Anyone have an opinion here or any formal prior art for us to build on?
>
Maybe this question should be more phrased as to which upgrade paths each
individual has time in helping and fixing users out?
If you are voting for official support for the 3.0 upgrade path then that
should imply you are
If a user asked me today, I would tell them to test the following paths
before attempting it in production:
- 2.1.x ---> 2.1.latest ---> 3.11.latest ---> 4.0
- 2.2.x ---> 2.2.latest ---> 3.11.latest ---> 4.0
- 3.0.x ---> 3.0.latest ---> 4.0
- 3.x ---> 3.11.late
+1 to officially supporting 3.0 to 4.0, in addition to 3.11 to 4.0 upgrade
paths
On Thu, Oct 8, 2020 at 10:33 PM Jeff Jirsa wrote:
>
> I assumed it would be 3.0.x and 3.11.x
>
> I don’t know why we’d make 3.0-4.0 unofficial/unsupported - there’s no
> technical reason I’ve seen
>
> > On Oct 8, 20
With 7 +1 votes, and no -1s, the vote passes.
On Fri, Oct 9, 2020 at 1:12 AM Nate McCall wrote:
> +1
>
> On Thu, Oct 8, 2020 at 9:20 PM Oleksandr Petrov <
> oleksandr.pet...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Proposing the test build of in-jvm dtest API 0.0.6 for release.
> >
> > Repository:
> >
> >
> ht
I assumed it would be 3.0.x and 3.11.x
I don’t know why we’d make 3.0-4.0 unofficial/unsupported - there’s no
technical reason I’ve seen
> On Oct 8, 2020, at 9:21 PM, Anthony Grasso wrote:
>
> Hi Josh,
>
> This is a really good question. I agree with David about making sure this
> is cle
Hi Josh,
This is a really good question. I agree with David about making sure this
is clearly documented.
As far as the supported upgrade path goes, I think we should officially
support only 3.11.x. I do understand the idea of giving users the
flexibility to upgrade from 3.0.x. However, the simpl
+1
On Thu, Oct 8, 2020 at 9:20 PM Oleksandr Petrov
wrote:
> Proposing the test build of in-jvm dtest API 0.0.6 for release.
>
> Repository:
>
> https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cassandra-in-jvm-dtest-api.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/tags/0.0.6
>
> Candidate SHA:
>
> https://github.com/apache/cassa
Thanks for bringing this up, we really should document this and make sure
the different upgrade paths are clearly documented and have proper coverage.
There was a conversation in slack a while back (started from
https://the-asf.slack.com/archives/CK23JSY2K/p1595906733435000) but not
formal or vote
Opted one issue, CASSANDRA-15821, back into 4.0-rc, as it was meant to
complete the documentation for CASSANDRA-15909, which is already resolved.
On Wed, Oct 7, 2020 at 2:27 PM David Capwell
wrote:
> Updated the link to exclude resolved; down to 27 remaining (was 32)
>
>
> https://issues.apache.
Thanks to those who provided input on the new site layout. #3 was the
winner with some additional comments, which we'll work to integrate.
In tandem with the new website design, page content has been updated and/or
created as new. Input would be greatly appreciated.
The content doc, plus next ste
Related JIRA ticket: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-15588
Description:
"We've historically had numerous bugs concerning upgrading clusters from
one version to the other. Let's establish the supported upgrade path and
ensure that users can safely perform the upgrades in production
I spoke with Blake about
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-15580 (new testing and
validation for Repair) - and unfortunately he's not going to have the
cycles to shepherd this validation in the immediate future.
So here's the ask - is there anyone on the project that knows repair fai
+1 (nb)
On Thu, 8 Oct 2020 at 17:15, Scott Andreas wrote:
> +1nb
>
>
> From: Jordan West
> Sent: Thursday, October 8, 2020 7:40 AM
> To: dev@cassandra.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release dtest-api 0.0.6
>
> +1
>
> On Thu, Oct 8, 2020 at 7:25 AM Bran
+1nb
From: Jordan West
Sent: Thursday, October 8, 2020 7:40 AM
To: dev@cassandra.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release dtest-api 0.0.6
+1
On Thu, Oct 8, 2020 at 7:25 AM Brandon Williams wrote:
> +1
>
> On Thu, Oct 8, 2020 at 3:20 AM Oleksandr Petrov
>
+1
On Thu, Oct 8, 2020 at 7:25 AM Brandon Williams wrote:
> +1
>
> On Thu, Oct 8, 2020 at 3:20 AM Oleksandr Petrov
> wrote:
> >
> > Proposing the test build of in-jvm dtest API 0.0.6 for release.
> >
> > Repository:
> >
> https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cassandra-in-jvm-dtest-api.git;a=sh
+1
On Thu, Oct 8, 2020 at 3:20 AM Oleksandr Petrov
wrote:
>
> Proposing the test build of in-jvm dtest API 0.0.6 for release.
>
> Repository:
> https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cassandra-in-jvm-dtest-api.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/tags/0.0.6
>
> Candidate SHA:
> https://github.com/apache/cassandr
+1
On 8 October 2020 at 10:20:22, Oleksandr Petrov (oleksandr.pet...@gmail.com)
wrote:
> Proposing the test build of in-jvm dtest API 0.0.6 for release.
>
> Repository:
> https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cassandra-in-jvm-dtest-api.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/tags/0.0.6
>
>
> Candidate SHA:
>
Proposing the test build of in-jvm dtest API 0.0.6 for release.
Repository:
https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cassandra-in-jvm-dtest-api.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/tags/0.0.6
Candidate SHA:
https://github.com/apache/cassandra-in-jvm-dtest-api/commit/9efeb731b6ff4036fa822b0282b27d273975cd6fTT
tagge
18 matches
Mail list logo
