Re: Cassandra 4.0 Status 2021-02-25

2021-02-26 Thread Benedict Elliott Smith
Fair enough. On 26/02/2021, 20:45, "Mick Semb Wever" wrote: Should we wait for e.g. five clean CI runs in a row? Historically flaky > tests have been a real issue for the project, and CI success probably > shouldn't be taken instantaneously for releases. There are tickets fo

Re: New Cassandra website for review

2021-02-26 Thread Benedict Elliott Smith
Very nice. On 26/02/2021, 21:36, "Melissa Logan" wrote: Hi all, We are excited to share the almost-complete Cassandra website design (CASSANDRA-16115). Huge thanks to Lorina Poland, Anthony Grosso, Mick Semb Weaver, Josh Levy, Chris Thornett, Diogenese Topper, and a few others

Re: New Cassandra website for review

2021-02-26 Thread Erick Ramirez
Fantastic! Can't wait for it to go live. On Sat, 27 Feb 2021 at 08:36, Melissa Logan wrote: > Hi all, > > We are excited to share the almost-complete Cassandra website design > (CASSANDRA-16115). Huge thanks to Lorina Poland, Anthony Grosso, Mick Semb > Weaver, Josh Levy, Chris Thornett, Diogen

Re: New Cassandra website for review

2021-02-26 Thread Ekaterina Dimitrova
On my phone looked quite good! Thanks everyone for all the hard work! Have a great weekend! :-) On Fri, 26 Feb 2021 at 16:44, Stefan Miklosovic < stefan.mikloso...@instaclustr.com> wrote: > Looks great, congrats! > > On Fri, 26 Feb 2021 at 22:36, Melissa Logan wrote: > > > > Hi all, > > > > We a

Re: New Cassandra website for review

2021-02-26 Thread Stefan Miklosovic
Looks great, congrats! On Fri, 26 Feb 2021 at 22:36, Melissa Logan wrote: > > Hi all, > > We are excited to share the almost-complete Cassandra website design > (CASSANDRA-16115). Huge thanks to Lorina Poland, Anthony Grosso, Mick Semb > Weaver, Josh Levy, Chris Thornett, Diogenese Topper, and a

New Cassandra website for review

2021-02-26 Thread Melissa Logan
Hi all, We are excited to share the almost-complete Cassandra website design (CASSANDRA-16115). Huge thanks to Lorina Poland, Anthony Grosso, Mick Semb Weaver, Josh Levy, Chris Thornett, Diogenese Topper, and a few others who contributed to this effort. Note: There are a few updates to be made pr

Re: Cassandra 4.0 Status 2021-02-25

2021-02-26 Thread Mick Semb Wever
Should we wait for e.g. five clean CI runs in a row? Historically flaky > tests have been a real issue for the project, and CI success probably > shouldn't be taken instantaneously for releases. There are tickets for flakey tests that have been pushed to fixVersion 4.0-rc intentionally, making

Re: Cassandra 4.0 Status 2021-02-25

2021-02-26 Thread Benedict Elliott Smith
Should we wait for e.g. five clean CI runs in a row? Historically flaky tests have been a real issue for the project, and CI success probably shouldn't be taken instantaneously for releases. On 26/02/2021, 19:38, "Michael Semb Wever" wrote: > * We’re within line-of-sight to closing out

Re: Cassandra 4.0 Status 2021-02-25

2021-02-26 Thread Michael Semb Wever
> * We’re within line-of-sight to closing out beta scope. Any work people can > do on remaining blockers will accelerate the project toward RC. So, last call for last minute concerns, the plan is to cut 4.0-rc1 once - those beta tickets are resolved, - the gremlins around v5 native protocol