Re: [DISCUSSION] Next release roadmap

I think my earlier response vanished into the moderator queue. Just a few comments: 1) The Paxos latency (and correctness) improvements I think should land in 4.0.x, as we have introduced a fairly significant regression and this work mostly resolves outstanding issues with LWTs today. 2) If we

Re: Switching the website to a temporary static html version of the new design

Thank you Mick et al! If you have feedback on the new site, please let us know here or on Slack and we will address. On Mon, Apr 26, 2021 at 8:50 AM Michael Semb Wever wrote: > > > > tl;dr Can we switch the website over to a temporary static-html > > version of the new design, while work on

Re: Switching the website to a temporary static html version of the new design

> tl;dr Can we switch the website over to a temporary static-html > version of the new design, while work on the final antora generated > version continues? done. - To unsubscribe, e-mail:

Re: [DISCUSSION] Next release roadmap

Hi Benjamin, Currently C* uses JUnit4 which seems to be obsolete. I think it is reasonable to migrate to JUnit5. I've created CASSANDRA-16630  ticket for that. If it is a good fit for the next release, I'd volunteer to get it done. I'd

Re: Switching the website to a temporary static html version of the new design

> is this version of the web page already "analytics friendly"? In the > context of https://plausible.cassandra.apache.org/cassandra.apache.org It is! it is still getting hacked in, but it will soon be formally part of the design and website generation.

Re: [DISCUSSION] Attracting new contributors

Your analysis makes a lot of sense to me. > 1. This is the most important and at the same time the hardest issue to > solve because committers in fact have limited bandwidth and are generally > working on larger impact items. Nevertheless we must understand the > importance of attracting new