Thanks Berenguer. Mainly I did detailed PR since I was not familiar with
Cassandra codebase and wanted to make sure I figured out the magnitude of
things lying ahead of me sooner by having tests failures etc :) Also partly
I get chunks of time where I just focus and do things so I better utilize
+1nb.
Thank you for sharing a Circle run, Sumanth!
From: Sumanth Pasupuleti
Sent: Wednesday, July 14, 2021 12:52 PM
To: dev@cassandra.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Cassandra 4.0.0 (take2)
+1 (nb)
Confirmed passing j8 UTs and dtests
>
>
>
> > Yes, we should perhaps remove target version from the template, and
> > introduce guidance on describing stability impact etc.
>
> Strong +1 to remove this from the template. I got sucked into the mistake
> of conflating implementation details and implications on where it lands
> instead
+1 (nb)
Confirmed passing j8 UTs and dtests
https://app.circleci.com/pipelines/github/sumanth-pasupuleti/cassandra/77/workflows/7b0ad00d-7ae3-41d2-b1a7-82fa63b7
On Wed, Jul 14, 2021 at 11:03 AM Jeremy Hanna
wrote:
> +1 (nb)
>
> > On Jul 15, 2021, at 3:42 AM, Blake Eggleston
> wrote:
> >
>
+1 (nb)
> On Jul 15, 2021, at 3:42 AM, Blake Eggleston
> wrote:
>
> +1
>
>> On Jul 14, 2021, at 8:21 AM, Aleksey Yeschenko wrote:
>>
>> +1
>>
On 14 Jul 2021, at 15:37, Jonathan Ellis wrote:
>>>
>>> +1
>>>
On Tue, Jul 13, 2021 at 5:14 PM Mick Semb Wever wrote:
+1
> On Jul 14, 2021, at 8:21 AM, Aleksey Yeschenko wrote:
>
> +1
>
>> On 14 Jul 2021, at 15:37, Jonathan Ellis wrote:
>>
>> +1
>>
>>> On Tue, Jul 13, 2021 at 5:14 PM Mick Semb Wever wrote:
>>>
>>> Proposing the test build of Cassandra 4.0.0 for release.
>>>
>>> sha1:
Same
On Wed, Jul 14, 2021 at 9:16 AM Brandon Williams wrote:
> I am +1 to both removal from the template and "we need this"
>
> On Wed, Jul 14, 2021 at 9:05 AM Joshua McKenzie
> wrote:
> >
> > And I'm a +1 on the "I agree we need this".
>
>
I am +1 to both removal from the template and "we need this"
On Wed, Jul 14, 2021 at 9:05 AM Joshua McKenzie wrote:
>
> >
> > Yes, we should perhaps remove target version from the template, and
> > introduce guidance on describing stability impact etc.
>
> Strong +1 to remove this from the
+1
> On 14 Jul 2021, at 15:37, Jonathan Ellis wrote:
>
> +1
>
> On Tue, Jul 13, 2021 at 5:14 PM Mick Semb Wever wrote:
>
>> Proposing the test build of Cassandra 4.0.0 for release.
>>
>> sha1: 924bf92fab1820942137138c779004acaf834187
>> Git:
>>
+1
On Tue, Jul 13, 2021 at 5:14 PM Mick Semb Wever wrote:
> Proposing the test build of Cassandra 4.0.0 for release.
>
> sha1: 924bf92fab1820942137138c779004acaf834187
> Git:
> https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cassandra.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/tags/4.0.0-tentative
> Maven Artifacts:
>
>
+1
On Tue, Jul 13, 2021 at 5:14 PM Mick Semb Wever wrote:
> Proposing the test build of Cassandra 4.0.0 for release.
>
> sha1: 924bf92fab1820942137138c779004acaf834187
> Git:
> https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cassandra.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/tags/4.0.0-tentative
> Maven Artifacts:
>
>
>
> Yes, we should perhaps remove target version from the template, and
> introduce guidance on describing stability impact etc.
Strong +1 to remove this from the template. I got sucked into the mistake
of conflating implementation details and implications on where it lands
instead of staying
+1
On Wed, Jul 14, 2021 at 7:22 AM guo Maxwell wrote:
> +1
>
> Paulo Motta 于2021年7月14日周三 下午7:03写道：
>
> > +1
> >
> > Em qua., 14 de jul. de 2021 às 05:10, Benjamin Lerer
> > escreveu:
> >
> > > +1
> > >
> > > Le mer. 14 juil. 2021 à 09:48, Mick Semb Wever a
> écrit
> > :
> > >
> > > > >
> > >
+1
On Wed, Jul 14, 2021 at 7:03 AM Paulo Motta
wrote:
> +1
>
> Em qua., 14 de jul. de 2021 às 02:29, Sumanth Pasupuleti <
> sumanth.pasupuleti...@gmail.com> escreveu:
>
> > +1 non-binding
> >
> > On Tue, Jul 13, 2021 at 10:05 PM Berenguer Blasi <
> berenguerbl...@gmail.com
> > >
> > wrote:
> >
> I think CEPs would benefit from describing their compatibility and
stability impacts, rather than trying to tie themselves to a
version, regardless of what context a specific version provides.
Yes, we should perhaps remove target version from the template, and introduce
guidance on describing
+1
Paulo Motta 于2021年7月14日周三 下午7:03写道：
> +1
>
> Em qua., 14 de jul. de 2021 às 05:10, Benjamin Lerer
> escreveu:
>
> > +1
> >
> > Le mer. 14 juil. 2021 à 09:48, Mick Semb Wever a écrit
> :
> >
> > > >
> > > > The vote will be open for 72 hours (longer if needed). Everyone who
> > > > has
+1
Em qua., 14 de jul. de 2021 às 05:10, Benjamin Lerer
escreveu:
> +1
>
> Le mer. 14 juil. 2021 à 09:48, Mick Semb Wever a écrit :
>
> > >
> > > The vote will be open for 72 hours (longer if needed). Everyone who
> > > has tested the build is invited to vote. Votes by PMC members are
> > >
+1
Em qua., 14 de jul. de 2021 às 02:29, Sumanth Pasupuleti <
sumanth.pasupuleti...@gmail.com> escreveu:
> +1 non-binding
>
> On Tue, Jul 13, 2021 at 10:05 PM Berenguer Blasi >
> wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > On 14/7/21 0:34, Nate McCall wrote:
> > > +1
> > >
> > >
> > > On Wed, Jul 14, 2021 at 2:49
>
> PRs will land soon for people to look at, but honestly we’re getting into
> an unnecessary tangle over target release. I think it would be a mistake to
> push this to a later release, because it is valuable and it will bring pain
> by creating divergence - but the question a CEP is meant to
+1
Le mer. 14 juil. 2021 à 09:48, Mick Semb Wever a écrit :
> >
> > The vote will be open for 72 hours (longer if needed). Everyone who
> > has tested the build is invited to vote. Votes by PMC members are
> > considered binding. A vote passes if there are at least three binding
> > +1s and no
>
> The vote will be open for 72 hours (longer if needed). Everyone who
> has tested the build is invited to vote. Votes by PMC members are
> considered binding. A vote passes if there are at least three binding
> +1s and no -1's.
>
+1
Tested:
sha1, md5, sha256, sha512 match.
gpg signatures
Noting here that the same question was asked and answered in the users@ ML.
Cheers!
Hi
Does someone have any suggestions on the maximum number of Data Centers
which NetworkTopology strategy can have for a keyspace. Not only
technically but considering performance as well.
In each Data Center RF is 3.
Thanks!
--
Shaurya Gupta
23 matches
Mail list logo
