+1
On 19/8/21 19:52, J. D. Jordan wrote:
> +1
>
>> On Aug 19, 2021, at 12:35 PM, Andrés de la Peña
>> wrote:
>>
>> +1
>>
>>> On Thu, 19 Aug 2021 at 18:33, Joshua McKenzie wrote:
>>>
>>> +1
>>>
>>> On Thu, Aug 19, 2021 at 12:19 PM bened...@apache.org
>>> wrote:
>>>
+1
From:
Long time listener, first time caller here - hello!
I am very interested in this part "Better safety among range movements:
Electorate verification during range movements provides a stronger assertion of
linearizability via assurance of the set of instances voting on a transaction.”
I have
> Why not throw an exception?
So this is essentially just a reporting mechanism for when an operation
encounters state that should be impossible – this will have been left behind by
prior operations, so the damage is already done and there’s no reason to throw
an exception and fail the current
I'm curious about this: "We will introduce mechanisms to spot and log
linearizability violations for the user to file as bug reports" Why not
throw an exception? Maybe it's just I don't quite see how this will be
detected. I think this is very interesting though.
Also, way to sell the next
+1
Sent from my iPhone
> On Aug 19, 2021, at 9:19 AM, bened...@apache.org wrote:
>
> +1
>
> From: Brandon Williams
> Date: Thursday, 19 August 2021 at 17:16
> To: dev@cassandra.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] CEP-11: Pluggable memtable implementations
> +1
>
>> On Thu, Aug 19, 2021 at
+1
> On Aug 19, 2021, at 12:35 PM, Andrés de la Peña
> wrote:
>
> +1
>
>> On Thu, 19 Aug 2021 at 18:33, Joshua McKenzie wrote:
>>
>> +1
>>
>> On Thu, Aug 19, 2021 at 12:19 PM bened...@apache.org
>> wrote:
>>
>>> +1
>>>
>>> From: Brandon Williams
>>> Date: Thursday, 19 August 2021 at
+1
On Thu, 19 Aug 2021 at 18:33, Joshua McKenzie wrote:
> +1
>
> On Thu, Aug 19, 2021 at 12:19 PM bened...@apache.org
> wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > From: Brandon Williams
> > Date: Thursday, 19 August 2021 at 17:16
> > To: dev@cassandra.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] CEP-11: Pluggable
+1
On Thu, Aug 19, 2021 at 12:19 PM bened...@apache.org
wrote:
> +1
>
> From: Brandon Williams
> Date: Thursday, 19 August 2021 at 17:16
> To: dev@cassandra.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] CEP-11: Pluggable memtable implementations
> +1
>
> On Thu, Aug 19, 2021 at 11:11 AM Branimir Lambov
>
+1
From: Brandon Williams
Date: Thursday, 19 August 2021 at 17:16
To: dev@cassandra.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] CEP-11: Pluggable memtable implementations
+1
On Thu, Aug 19, 2021 at 11:11 AM Branimir Lambov wrote:
>
> Hello everyone,
>
> I am proposing the CEP-11 (Pluggable memtable
+1
On Thu, Aug 19, 2021 at 11:11 AM Branimir Lambov wrote:
>
> Hello everyone,
>
> I am proposing the CEP-11 (Pluggable memtable implementations) for adoption
>
> Discussion thread:
>
+1
On Thu, 19 Aug 2021 at 12:13, Benjamin Lerer wrote:
> +1
>
> Le jeu. 19 août 2021 à 18:11, Branimir Lambov a
> écrit :
>
> > Hello everyone,
> >
> > I am proposing the CEP-11 (Pluggable memtable implementations) for
> adoption
> >
> > Discussion thread:
> >
> >
>
+1
Le jeu. 19 août 2021 à 18:11, Branimir Lambov a écrit :
> Hello everyone,
>
> I am proposing the CEP-11 (Pluggable memtable implementations) for adoption
>
> Discussion thread:
>
>
Hello everyone,
I am proposing the CEP-11 (Pluggable memtable implementations) for adoption
Discussion thread:
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rb5e950f882196764744c31bc3c13dfbf0603cb9f8bc2f6cfb976d285%40%3Cdev.cassandra.apache.org%3E
The vote will be open for 72 hours.
Votes by PMC
Hi Jeremy,
That’s a great question, and the answer is that we shouldn’t compare the two as
they aren’t in conflict. The goal of this work is only to improve the existing
Paxos implementation – the characteristics are identical besides being faster,
so this is a simple and safe upgrade route
14 matches
Mail list logo
