Re: [VOTE] CEP-14: Paxos Improvements

+1 On Fri, Aug 27, 2021 at 7:41 PM Ekaterina Dimitrova wrote: > +1 > > On Fri, 27 Aug 2021 at 19:40, David Capwell > wrote: > > > +1 > > > > > On Aug 27, 2021, at 3:26 PM, Patrick McFadin > wrote: > > > > > > +1 nb > > > > > > On Fri, Aug 27, 2021 at 1:02 PM Jeff Jirsa wrote: > > > > > >> +1

Re: [VOTE] CEP-14: Paxos Improvements

+1 On Fri, 27 Aug 2021 at 19:40, David Capwell wrote: > +1 > > > On Aug 27, 2021, at 3:26 PM, Patrick McFadin wrote: > > > > +1 nb > > > > On Fri, Aug 27, 2021 at 1:02 PM Jeff Jirsa wrote: > > > >> +1 > >> > >>> On Aug 27, 2021, at 1:00 PM, Scott Andreas > wrote: > >>> > >>> +1 > >>> >

Re: [VOTE] CEP-14: Paxos Improvements

+1 > On Aug 27, 2021, at 3:26 PM, Patrick McFadin wrote: > > +1 nb > > On Fri, Aug 27, 2021 at 1:02 PM Jeff Jirsa wrote: > >> +1 >> >>> On Aug 27, 2021, at 1:00 PM, Scott Andreas wrote: >>> >>> +1 >>> On Aug 27, 2021, at 12:58 PM, Mick Semb Wever wrote:  > >

Re: [VOTE] CEP-14: Paxos Improvements

+1 nb On Fri, Aug 27, 2021 at 1:02 PM Jeff Jirsa wrote: > +1 > > > On Aug 27, 2021, at 1:00 PM, Scott Andreas wrote: > > > > +1 > > > >> On Aug 27, 2021, at 12:58 PM, Mick Semb Wever wrote: > >> > >>  > >>> > >>> > >>> Proposal: > >>> >

Re: [DISCUSS] Repair Improvement Proposal

Push vs pull isn’t too critical, but there is one edge case to consider; if we didn’t think the participate got restarted triggering validation again (which may have caused the process to end) could be a problem. > On Aug 26, 2021, at 9:50 AM, Yifan Cai wrote: > >> >> 2. Add retries to

Re: [VOTE] CEP-14: Paxos Improvements

+1 > On Aug 27, 2021, at 12:48 PM, bened...@apache.org wrote: > > Hi everyone, I’m proposing this CEP for approval. > > Proposal: > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CASSANDRA/CEP-14%3A+Paxos+Improvements > Discussion: >

Re: [VOTE] CEP-14: Paxos Improvements

+1 On Fri, Aug 27, 2021 at 2:55 PM bened...@apache.org wrote: > > Hi everyone, I’m proposing this CEP for approval. > > Proposal: > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CASSANDRA/CEP-14%3A+Paxos+Improvements > Discussion: >

Re: [VOTE] CEP-14: Paxos Improvements

+1 > On Aug 27, 2021, at 12:58 PM, Mick Semb Wever wrote: > >  >> >> >> Proposal: >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CASSANDRA/CEP-14%3A+Paxos+Improvements >> Discussion: >>

Re: [VOTE] CEP-14: Paxos Improvements

> > Proposal: > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CASSANDRA/CEP-14%3A+Paxos+Improvements > Discussion: > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r1af3da2d875ef93479e3874072ee651f406b96c915759c7968d3266e%40%3Cdev.cassandra.apache.org%3E > > The vote will be open for 72 hours. > Votes by

[VOTE] CEP-14: Paxos Improvements

Hi everyone, I’m proposing this CEP for approval. Proposal: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CASSANDRA/CEP-14%3A+Paxos+Improvements Discussion: https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r1af3da2d875ef93479e3874072ee651f406b96c915759c7968d3266e%40%3Cdev.cassandra.apache.org%3E The vote

Re: [DISCUSS] CEP-13: Denylisting partitions

I can see the case for all three: * Deny both reads and writes to a partition (wide, heavily tombstones, too many stables, etc) causing disruption to a replica set; don't want further growth nor reads until operator intervention * Deny reads but allow writing to rectify problems on a partition

Re: [DISCUSS] Java support roadmap

Apologize, seems I sent the tickets and didn’t see the last mail from Enrico which arrived in the meantime. I will check the link, thanks for sharing! On Fri, 27 Aug 2021 at 9:17, Brandon Williams wrote: > Thanks for pointing this out, Enrico! It looks like Cassandra could > be a natural fit

Re: [DISCUSS] Java support roadmap

Thanks for pointing this out, Enrico! It looks like Cassandra could be a natural fit here since it's already using OpenJDK quite a bit. On Fri, Aug 27, 2021 at 7:47 AM Enrico Olivelli wrote: > > (sorry if being slightly off-topic, but let be throw this ball here) > > What about joining the

Re: [DISCUSS] Java support roadmap

Thank you all for your valuable feedback. I just created below two tickets to facilitate the outcome of the discussion: - CASSANDRA-16894 - Java 11 support - remove the experimental flag - CASSANDRA-16895 - Support Java 17 On Fri, 27 Aug 2021 at 8:47, Enrico Olivelli wrote: > (sorry if being

Re: [DISCUSS] Java support roadmap

(sorry if being slightly off-topic, but let be throw this ball here) What about joining the OpenJDK Quality outreach program? https://wiki.openjdk.java.net/display/quality/Quality+Outreach Many other Apache projects contribute to that initiative and this helps Java to be always compatible with

Re: Save CircleCI resources with optional test jobs

Hi, CASSANDRA-16882 has patches for any of the mentioned configurations aimed to save CircleCI resources. There are CircleCI runs showing how each approach would look like, plus an additional fourth option: 1. Make the entire workflow optional:

Re: Code Contributor stats: patches, reviews, and relationships

Thanks for the script Mick. I found it really useful to have a better view of people's contributions. Le lun. 9 août 2021 à 16:18, Mick Semb Wever a écrit : > > > > The following metrics provide top lists of contributors for different > time > > periods. Listing patches, reviews, and who has

Re: [DISCUSS] Java support roadmap

+1 on my side too for removal of experimental for 11, and moving trunk to 11+17 Le jeu. 26 août 2021 à 22:28, Nate McCall a écrit : > > > > > > Last but not least, do we know anyone running Java 11 in production? > > This thread was really opened as a stage to share our thoughts and > >

Re: [DISCUSS] CEP 14: Paxos Improvements

Just wanted to mention that I am super eager to see your proposal implemented, Benedict. Thanks for pushing this forward :-) Le mer. 25 août 2021 à 10:29, bened...@apache.org a écrit : > I’ll move this to a vote in a day or so, assuming no further discussion. > > From: Jeff Jirsa > Date: