Re: [DISCUSS] CEP-15: General Purpose Transactions

+1 One of the major advantages of a separate library would be modularity. Dinesh > On Sep 5, 2021, at 3:02 PM, bened...@apache.org wrote: > > Yep, that’s correct. In fact my goal is that we maintain this as a > standalone library long term. While its primary goal will be integration with >

Re: [DISCUSS] CEP-15: General Purpose Transactions

Yep, that’s correct. In fact my goal is that we maintain this as a standalone library long term. While its primary goal will be integration with Cassandra, I think there is value in maintaining a distinct library for the core functionality - so long as the burden remains manageable. From: Nate

Re: [DISCUSS] CEP-15: General Purpose Transactions

Hi Benedict, If I'm parsing this correctly, you want to include the stand-alone library in the project as a separate repo to begin with, correct? (I'm +1 on that, if so). Otherwise I am very intrigued by the paper and proposal. This looks excellent. Thanks Benedict, et all for putting this

[DISCUSS] CEP-15: General Purpose Transactions

Wiki: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CASSANDRA/CEP-15%3A+General+Purpose+Transactions Whitepaper: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/download/attachments/188744725/Accord.pdf