[RESULT][VOTE] Release dtest-api 0.0.9

> Proposing the test build of in-jvm dtest API 0.0.9 for release. > Vote passes with 8 +1s (3 binding) and no vetoes. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@cassandra.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@cass

Re: [VOTE] Release dtest-api 0.0.9

+1 - Yifan > On Sep 9, 2021, at 3:04 PM, Paulo Motta wrote: > > +1 > >> On Thu, 9 Sep 2021 at 18:38 Ekaterina Dimitrova >> wrote: >> >> +1 >> >> On Thu, 9 Sep 2021 at 17:34, C. Scott Andreas >> wrote: >> >>> +1nb >>> On Sep 9, 2021, at 2:03 PM, David Capwell >>> wrote:

Re: [VOTE] Release dtest-api 0.0.9

+1 On Thu, 9 Sep 2021 at 18:38 Ekaterina Dimitrova wrote: > +1 > > On Thu, 9 Sep 2021 at 17:34, C. Scott Andreas > wrote: > > > +1nb > > > > > > > > On Sep 9, 2021, at 2:03 PM, David Capwell > > wrote: > > > > > > +1 > > > > > >> On Sep 9, 2021, at 1:52 PM, Mick Semb Wever wrote: > > >> > >

Re: [VOTE] Release dtest-api 0.0.9

+1 On Thu, 9 Sep 2021 at 17:34, C. Scott Andreas wrote: > +1nb > > > > > On Sep 9, 2021, at 2:03 PM, David Capwell > wrote: > > > > +1 > > > >> On Sep 9, 2021, at 1:52 PM, Mick Semb Wever wrote: > >> > >> +1 > >> > >>> On Thu, 2 Sept 2021 at 13:20, Mick Semb Wever wrote: > >>> > >>> Proposin

Re: [VOTE] Release dtest-api 0.0.9

+1nb > > On Sep 9, 2021, at 2:03 PM, David Capwell wrote: > > +1 > >> On Sep 9, 2021, at 1:52 PM, Mick Semb Wever wrote: >> >> +1 >> >>> On Thu, 2 Sept 2021 at 13:20, Mick Semb Wever wrote: >>> >>> Proposing the test build of in-jvm dtest API 0.0.9 for release. >>> >>> Repository: >>>

[DISCUSS] Java 17 support - Nashorn removed

Hi team, I started some initial work on the Java 17 support (CASSANDRA-16895). One of the first observations is that Nashorn, which was already deprecated in Java 11, is already fully removed. We use it for UDFs and one short script

Re: [VOTE] Release dtest-api 0.0.9

+1 > On Sep 9, 2021, at 1:52 PM, Mick Semb Wever wrote: > > +1 > > On Thu, 2 Sept 2021 at 13:20, Mick Semb Wever wrote: >> >> Proposing the test build of in-jvm dtest API 0.0.9 for release. >> >> Repository: >> https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cassandra-in-jvm-dtest-api.git;a=shortlog;

Re: Keeping on top of test failures

+1 > On Sep 9, 2021, at 10:27 AM, Mick Semb Wever wrote: > > +1, much appreciated. > > > On 2021/09/09 16:03:31, Andrés de la Peña wrote: >> +1, thanks for the proposal. >> >> On Thu, 9 Sept 2021 at 16:45, Brandon Williams wrote: >> >>> +1 >>> >>> On Thu, Sep 9, 2021 at 10:39 AM Joshua M

Re: [VOTE] Release dtest-api 0.0.9

+1 On Thu, 2 Sept 2021 at 13:20, Mick Semb Wever wrote: > > Proposing the test build of in-jvm dtest API 0.0.9 for release. > > Repository: > https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cassandra-in-jvm-dtest-api.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/tags/0.0.9 > > Candidate SHA: > https://github.com/apache/cassandr

Re: Keeping on top of test failures

+1, much appreciated. On 2021/09/09 16:03:31, Andrés de la Peña wrote: > +1, thanks for the proposal. > > On Thu, 9 Sept 2021 at 16:45, Brandon Williams wrote: > > > +1 > > > > On Thu, Sep 9, 2021 at 10:39 AM Joshua McKenzie > > wrote: > > > > > > (Taking #cassandra-dev slack chat to here)

Re: [DISCUSS] CEP-7 Storage Attached Index

+1 on introducing this in an incremental manner and after reading through CASSANDRA-16092 that seems like a perfect place to start. I see that work on that Jira has stopped until direction for CEP-7 has been voted in. I say start the vote and let's get this really valuable developer feature underw

Re: Keeping on top of test failures

+1, thanks for the proposal. On Thu, 9 Sept 2021 at 16:45, Brandon Williams wrote: > +1 > > On Thu, Sep 9, 2021 at 10:39 AM Joshua McKenzie > wrote: > > > > (Taking #cassandra-dev slack chat to here) > > > > For context, we have a long history of an ebb and flow of flaky test > > failures build

Re: Keeping on top of test failures

+1 On Thu, Sep 9, 2021 at 10:39 AM Joshua McKenzie wrote: > > (Taking #cassandra-dev slack chat to here) > > For context, we have a long history of an ebb and flow of flaky test > failures building up and getting burned down, but don't really have a > workflow or discipline around having a clean

Re: Keeping on top of test failures

Same here, +1, thank you! On Thu, 9 Sep 2021 at 11:35, Benjamin Lerer wrote: > Thanks for the proposal Josh. > It sounds good to me. > > Le jeu. 9 sept. 2021 à 17:32, Joshua McKenzie a > écrit : > > > (Taking #cassandra-dev slack chat to here) > > > > For context, we have a long history of an e

Re: Keeping on top of test failures

Thanks for the proposal Josh. It sounds good to me. Le jeu. 9 sept. 2021 à 17:32, Joshua McKenzie a écrit : > (Taking #cassandra-dev slack chat to here) > > For context, we have a long history of an ebb and flow of flaky test > failures building up and getting burned down, but don't really have

Keeping on top of test failures

(Taking #cassandra-dev slack chat to here) For context, we have a long history of an ebb and flow of flaky test failures building up and getting burned down, but don't really have a workflow or discipline around having a clean snapshot of where we are or attempting to stay at some kind of steady s