+1. I would add a 'post-commit' step: check the jenkins CI run for your
merge and see if sthg broke regardless.
On 6/12/21 23:51, Ekaterina Dimitrova wrote:
> Hi Josh,
> All good questions, thank you for raising this topic.
> To the best of my knowledge, we don't have those documented but I will
Ok seems I was wrong and messed up the mails in my mailbox. Please ignore
my previous email
On Mon, 6 Dec 2021 at 18:01, Ekaterina Dimitrova
wrote:
>
> I think the script discussion is on a different thread and attached
> document which I am also about to address soon :-)
>
> On Mon, 6 Dec 2021
Please find my comments inline below
* Good with nested configs - the question is how they will be introduced
and maintained? I wouldn't advocate for maintaining more than yaml file but
probably as you once mentioned some time ago (if I remember correctly) -
having one format as default and just
I think the script discussion is on a different thread and attached
document which I am also about to address soon :-)
On Mon, 6 Dec 2021 at 17:59, bened...@apache.org
wrote:
> Is there a reason we discounted modifying the merge strategy?
>
> I’m just a little wary of relying on scripts for
Is there a reason we discounted modifying the merge strategy?
I’m just a little wary of relying on scripts for consistency of behaviour here.
Environments differ, and it would be far preferable for consistency of
behaviour to rely on shared infrastructure if possible. I would probably be
As I work through the scripting on this, I don't know if we've documented
or clarified the following (don't see it here:
https://cassandra.apache.org/_/development/testing.html):
Pre-commit test suites:
* Which JDK's?
* When to include all python tests or do JVM only (if ever)?
* When to run
+1
On Mon, Dec 6, 2021 at 5:00 AM Aleksey Yeschenko wrote:
>
> Agreed as well.
>
> > On 4 Dec 2021, at 23:28, bened...@apache.org wrote:
> >
> > I think you were correct to start a DISCUSS thread, Bowen. You should not
> > start a vote until you have first established if there is consensus.
> >
+1, thank you for looking into this
On Mon, 6 Dec 2021 at 6:15, Benjamin Lerer wrote:
> +1
>
> Le lun. 6 déc. 2021 à 12:00, Aleksey Yeschenko a
> écrit :
>
> > Agreed as well.
> >
> > > On 4 Dec 2021, at 23:28, bened...@apache.org wrote:
> > >
> > > I think you were correct to start a DISCUSS
Agreed as well.
> On 4 Dec 2021, at 23:28, bened...@apache.org wrote:
>
> I think you were correct to start a DISCUSS thread, Bowen. You should not
> start a vote until you have first established if there is consensus.
>
> Also, I agree with the proposal.
>
> From: Bowen Song
> Date:
