[RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache Cassandra 4.1.0 (take2)

2022-12-12 Thread Mick Semb Wever
Proposing the (second) test build of Cassandra 4.1.0 for release. > > sha1: f9e033f519c14596da4dc954875756a69aea4e78 > Git: > https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cassandra.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/tags/4.1.0-tentative > Maven Artifacts: > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachec

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Cassandra 4.1.0 (take2)

2022-12-12 Thread Abe Ratnofsky
I agree Benedict - I don't think we can provide a clear advisory to our users, so I would approve of not sharing anything in the release notes. But if someone posts an issue (likely to the user ML) related to streaming / bootstrapping on 4.1.0, then we should engage with the knowledge that it mi

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Cassandra 4.1.0 (take2)

2022-12-12 Thread Benedict
I’m unsure that without more information it is very helpful to highlight in the release notes. We don’t even have a strong hypothesis tying this issue to 4.1.0 specifically, and don’t have a general policy of highlighting undiagnosed issues in release notes? > On 13 Dec 2022, at 00:48, Jon Me

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Cassandra 4.1.0 (take2)

2022-12-12 Thread Jon Meredith
Thanks for the extra time to investigate. Unfortunately no progress on finding the root cause for this issue, just successful bootstraps in our attempts to reproduce. I think highlighting the ticket in the release notes is sufficient and resolving this issue should not hold up the release. I agree

Re: [DISCUSSION] New dependencies for SAI CEP-7

2022-12-12 Thread David Capwell
> com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.randomizedtesting-runner 2.1.2 - test > dependency Can you talk more about why? There are several ways to do random testing in-tree ATM, so wondering why we need another one > On Dec 8, 2022, at 6:51 AM, Mike Adamson wrote: > > Hi, > > I wanted to discu

Re: [DISCUSSION] Cassandra's code style and source code analysis

2022-12-12 Thread Maxim Muzafarov
> Technically it can be two commits which would be merged / pushed at once. I'll prepare a new pull request containing both of the changes. My previous experience says me that it's really hard to find a reviewer who will be able to go through huge pull requests, that's why initially I've split thi