> FYI, devbranch (pre-commit) on ci-cassandra.a.o is hardcoded to build on
> jdk8 and jdk11
> so it's not going to work with trunk based patches…
>
> I'll review any patches to fix this, but otherwise focus is
> on CASSANDRA-18594 where a standalone jenkinsfile avoids this problem
> altogether.
>
Very nice! I'll kick the tires a bit, and add a sai test to tlp-stress
On 2023/07/26 18:56:29 Caleb Rackliffe wrote:
> Alright, the cep-7-sai branch is now merged to trunk!
>
> Now we move to addressing the most urgent items from "Phase 2" (
> CASSANDRA-18473
I have to say how excited I am that I get to emphasize SAI as an indexing
method for Apache C*, rather than the much less capable 2i! I have been
waiting for this day for years! Thanks Caleb and all who worked to make
this day a reality!
Lorina
On Wed, Jul 26, 2023 at 10:08 PM Berenguer Blasi
CASSANDRA-18701
On Thu, 27 Jul 2023 at 13:10, Ekaterina Dimitrova
wrote:
> It seems there was some misunderstanding as dev-branch was on the list of
> tasks to be fixed here.
>
> Anyway, I will work on a patch as I do not want to block people who are
> using it, thanks. My understanding from a
It seems there was some misunderstanding as dev-branch was on the list of
tasks to be fixed here.
Anyway, I will work on a patch as I do not want to block people who are
using it, thanks. My understanding from a private conversation is that
CASSANDRA-18594 might land in August-September so I
> I am working on dropping JDK 8 and adding JDK17 on trunk in both CI
systems today.
> This requires numerous patches in a few repos so you will be seeing more
failures in CI throughout the day today, but it shouldn’t be anything more
爛 than what we have listed in the table of failures in
+1 to what you've stated here Mick with a question: where did we land on
flagging new features as experimental? Seems like it's an "at author's
discretion" - search of the list turned up not too much structure there. Had a
statement to that effect from Benjamin here
+1 to the change pre 5.0.
Any committers have bandwidth to review
https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/CASSANDRA/issues/CASSANDRA-14667?
PR can be found here: https://github.com/apache/cassandra/pull/2238/files
On Thu, Jul 27, 2023, at 7:59 AM, Maxim Muzafarov wrote:
> Bump this topic up
> The idea that your data integrity needs to be opt-in has never made sense to
> me from the perspective of either the product or the end user.
I could not agree with this more. 100%.
> The current (and past) state of things where running the DB correctly
> **requires* *running a separate
+1 on freeze 1st August with the suggested waiver.
Also, +1 on the idea for alpha 1, as long as we give straight upfront the
right expectations to users.
Now, when we added also JDK17 in CI, I want to encourage people to start
testing it in their test environments and give us some feedback.
Bump this topic up for visibility as the code freeze is coming soon.
This seems like a good change to include in 5.0 as this kind of
library upgrade is more natural when the major version changes. It is
still possible to postpone it to 6.0, but the main concern here is
that the current version of
I plan to run few builds with Corretto etc and do few manual tests, I will try
to push that as soon as possible but it might happen it will leak to the next
week.
From: Mick Semb Wever
Sent: Thursday, July 27, 2023 0:27
To: dev
Subject: August 5.0
12 matches
Mail list logo
