Re: [DISCUSSIONS] Replace ant eclipse-warnings with CheckerFramework

2023-06-18 Thread Ekaterina Dimitrova
Thank you all! It seems there is a consensus here so I updated accordingly CASSANDRA-18239 On Fri, 16 Jun 2023 at 8:56, Jeremiah Jordan wrote: > +1 from me. > > On Jun 15, 2023 at 1:01:01 PM, Ekaterina Dimitrova > wrote: > >> Hi everyone, >> Happy Thursday! >> Some time ago, Jacek raised the

Re: [DISCUSSIONS] Replace ant eclipse-warnings with CheckerFramework

2023-06-16 Thread Jeremiah Jordan
+1 from me. On Jun 15, 2023 at 1:01:01 PM, Ekaterina Dimitrova wrote: > Hi everyone, > Happy Thursday! > Some time ago, Jacek raised the point that ant eclipse-warnings is generating > too many false positives and not really working as expected. (CASSANDRA-18239) > > Reminder: ant

Re: [DISCUSSIONS] Replace ant eclipse-warnings with CheckerFramework

2023-06-16 Thread Jacek Lewandowski
Later, we may enable more checks than just leaked resources to improve the code gradually. - - -- --- - - Jacek Lewandowski pt., 16 cze 2023 o 13:48 Ekaterina Dimitrova napisał(a): > Got so excited that I forgot to say which of the two options exactly I > meant -

Re: [DISCUSSIONS] Replace ant eclipse-warnings with CheckerFramework

2023-06-16 Thread Ekaterina Dimitrova
Got so excited that I forgot to say which of the two options exactly I meant - running the analysis only on changed files after the initial full pass is done sounds like a good improvement to me On Fri, 16 Jun 2023 at 7:43, Ekaterina Dimitrova wrote: > I think this is a great idea and it will

Re: [DISCUSSIONS] Replace ant eclipse-warnings with CheckerFramework

2023-06-16 Thread Ekaterina Dimitrova
I think this is a great idea and it will probably reduce the time to run it. Thank you! On Fri, 16 Jun 2023 at 7:40, Jacek Lewandowski wrote: > Additional question is whether we want to run the checks against the whole > project or just against the file changes between the feature branch and

Re: [DISCUSSIONS] Replace ant eclipse-warnings with CheckerFramework

2023-06-16 Thread Jacek Lewandowski
Additional question is whether we want to run the checks against the whole project or just against the file changes between the feature branch and the target release branch? - - -- --- - - Jacek Lewandowski pt., 16 cze 2023 o 13:09 Aleksey Yeshchenko napisał(a): >

Re: [DISCUSSIONS] Replace ant eclipse-warnings with CheckerFramework

2023-06-16 Thread Aleksey Yeshchenko
Sounds like a clear improvement to me. Only once this check flagged a legitimate issue I missed, if I’m remembering correctly. All other instances have just been annoyances, forcing to add a redundant suppressed annotation. > On 15 Jun 2023, at 19:01, Ekaterina Dimitrova wrote: > > Hi

[DISCUSSIONS] Replace ant eclipse-warnings with CheckerFramework

2023-06-15 Thread Ekaterina Dimitrova
Hi everyone, Happy Thursday! Some time ago, Jacek raised the point that ant eclipse-warnings is generating too many false positives and not really working as expected. (CASSANDRA-18239) Reminder: ant eclipse-warnings is a task we run with the goal to check Cassandra code - static analysis to warn