Re: [VOTE] 0.6.8 RC1

2010-11-11 Thread Stu Hood
-1 1722 was just backported to the 0.6 branch (r1034172): I think we'll need to reroll... sorry! https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-1722 On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 4:51 PM, Eric Evans wrote: > On Thu, 2010-11-11 at 14:44 -0600, Jo

Re: [VOTE] 0.6.8 RC1

2010-11-11 Thread Eric Evans
On Thu, 2010-11-11 at 14:44 -0600, Jonathan Ellis wrote: > For the record, the regression was caused by 1622, noticed in testing > for 1719, and fixed in 1727. :) What's that you say? You want a recipe for carrot cake? -- Eric Evans eev...@rackspace.com

Re: [VOTE] 0.6.8 RC1

2010-11-11 Thread Brandon Williams
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 2:43 PM, Eric Evans wrote: > > SVN: > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cassandra/branches/cassandra-...@r1034097 > 0.6.8 artifacts: http://people.apache.org/~eevans +1 > I'd be happy to make an exception here and shorten the voting period to > expedite this release (say

Re: [VOTE] 0.6.8 RC1

2010-11-11 Thread Jonathan Ellis
For the record, the regression was caused by 1622, noticed in testing for 1719, and fixed in 1727. :) +1 on the release from me, and I'm okay with expediting it. On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 2:43 PM, Eric Evans wrote: > > We had a regression in the way of CASSANDRA-1719[1] make its way into > the las

[VOTE] 0.6.8 RC1

2010-11-11 Thread Eric Evans
We had a regression in the way of CASSANDRA-1719[1] make its way into the last release. With that fixed now, I'd like to propose the following artifacts for 0.6.8. SVN: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cassandra/branches/cassandra-...@r1034097 0.6.8 artifacts: http://people.apache.org/~eevans I'