On Sat, 2010-11-20 at 11:41 -0600, Eric Evans wrote:
> SVN:
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cassandra/branches/cassandra-...@r1037265
> 0.7.0-rc1 artifacts: http://people.apache.org/~eevans
>
> The vote will be open for 72 hours, (longer if need be).
That makes 4 binding +1s and 2 others, with
+1 (non binding)
On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 4:53 PM, Gary Dusbabek wrote:
> +1
>
> On Sat, Nov 20, 2010 at 11:41, Eric Evans wrote:
>>
>> Barring anything unforeseen, we should be just about there. I propose
>> the following for release as 0.7.0 RC1.
>>
>> SVN:
>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/
+1
On Sat, Nov 20, 2010 at 11:41, Eric Evans wrote:
>
> Barring anything unforeseen, we should be just about there. I propose
> the following for release as 0.7.0 RC1.
>
> SVN:
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cassandra/branches/cassandra-...@r1037265
> 0.7.0-rc1 artifacts: http://people.apach
+1
On Sat, Nov 20, 2010 at 11:41 AM, Eric Evans wrote:
>
> Barring anything unforeseen, we should be just about there. I propose
> the following for release as 0.7.0 RC1.
>
> SVN:
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cassandra/branches/cassandra-...@r1037265
> 0.7.0-rc1 artifacts: http://people.ap
+1
On Sat, Nov 20, 2010 at 11:41 AM, Eric Evans wrote:
>
> Barring anything unforeseen, we should be just about there. I propose
> the following for release as 0.7.0 RC1.
>
> SVN:
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cassandra/branches/cassandra-...@r1037265
> 0.7.0-rc1 artifacts: http://people.a
Tried the artifacts on a fresh install of Ubuntu 10.10.
Ran the contrib/word_count, pig, and hadoop_output_streaming examples on a
single node. Worked fine from that perspective (wanted to do a hadoop
integration sanity check for the RC).
+1 (non-binding)
On Nov 20, 2010, at 11:41 AM, Eric Eva
Barring anything unforeseen, we should be just about there. I propose
the following for release as 0.7.0 RC1.
SVN:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cassandra/branches/cassandra-...@r1037265
0.7.0-rc1 artifacts: http://people.apache.org/~eevans
The vote will be open for 72 hours, (longer if need
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 9:44 AM, Gary Dusbabek wrote:
> +1 beta3.
>
+1 beta3.
> -1 on committing huge changes at the end of a cycle of betas. Let's
> not do that any more.
+1 on Gary's -1 to committing huge changes at the end of a cycle.
-Brandon
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 9:44 AM, Gary Dusbabek wrote:
> -1 on committing huge changes at the end of a cycle of betas. Let's
> not do that any more.
Agreed.
Glass half full: we won't have to merge between byte[] and ByteBuffer
from 0.7 to 0.8.
--
Jonathan Ellis
Project Chair, Apache Cassandra
c
+1 beta3.
-1 on committing huge changes at the end of a cycle of betas. Let's
not do that any more.
Gary.
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 05:48, Jonathan Ellis wrote:
> I vote for releasing the artifact as-is but as beta3. Broken HH is
> not something we should have in the final release but we need to
I agree with that. The changes of #1367 are extensive enough that
having a beta3 makes sense.
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 12:52 PM, Jonathan Ellis wrote:
> ... actually this would require rebuilding the artifacts to change the
> version string anyway, so I vote for releasing current 0.7 branch as
> b
... actually this would require rebuilding the artifacts to change the
version string anyway, so I vote for releasing current 0.7 branch as
beta3.
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 5:47 AM, Jonathan Ellis wrote:
> I vote for releasing the artifact as-is but as beta3. Broken HH is not
> something we should
I vote for releasing the artifact as-is but as beta3. Broken HH is
not something we should have in the final release but we need to get
wider testing of the other changes.
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 4:26 AM, Sylvain Lebresne wrote:
> I think Hinted handoff are buggy in current rc1-snapshot
> (see h
I think Hinted handoff are buggy in current rc1-snapshot
(see https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-1672).
I think this pretty much prevent hints from being delivered. Don't
know if that is considered harmful enough to re-roll RC1.
--
Sylvain
On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 6:09 PM, Eric Evans
> We're closing in on a final; it shouldn't be long now. I propose the
> following for 0.7.0 Release Candidate 1.
OK, here is attempt #2 of 0.7.0 RC1 (or "RC2 of RC1" if you prefer).
SVN:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cassandra/branches/cassandra-...@r1027572
0.7.0-rc1 artifacts: http://peop
se/CASSANDRA-1655
>
> -Original Message-
> From: "Eric Evans"
> Sent: Friday, October 22, 2010 10:28pm
> To: dev@cassandra.apache.org
> Subject: [VOTE] 0.7.0 RC1
>
>
> We're closing in on a final; it shouldn't be long now. I propose the
> following for 0.7
Sounds reasonable: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-1659
-Original Message-
From: "Jonathan Ellis"
Sent: Saturday, October 23, 2010 5:08pm
To: "dev"
Subject: Re: [VOTE] 0.7.0 RC1
Maybe we should set the new value to unframed always and include a
w
x27;t connect by default. I guess it's a
> known issue.
>
> Sorry!
>
> -Original Message-
> From: "Stu Hood"
> Sent: Saturday, October 23, 2010 2:03pm
> To: dev@cassandra.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] 0.7.0 RC1
>
> And as the last variable,
a.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] 0.7.0 RC1
And as the last variable, the src artifact builds and does not exhibit the
problem, so this is very likely a problem with the classes in the bin artifact.
-Original Message-
From: "Stu Hood"
Sent: Saturday, October 23, 2010 1:59pm
To: de
OTE] 0.7.0 RC1
I'm only seeing the problem with the artifacts.
-Original Message-
From: "Jonathan Ellis"
Sent: Saturday, October 23, 2010 1:51pm
To: "dev"
Subject: Re: [VOTE] 0.7.0 RC1
Are you seeing this just on the artifacts or on trunk?
Trunk gives me
$
I'm only seeing the problem with the artifacts.
-Original Message-
From: "Jonathan Ellis"
Sent: Saturday, October 23, 2010 1:51pm
To: "dev"
Subject: Re: [VOTE] 0.7.0 RC1
Are you seeing this just on the artifacts or on trunk?
Trunk gives me
$ bin/cassa
te:
> Also, client connections fail immediately with a version mismatch: something
> is not kosher with the Thrift build. Poor cats.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: "Stu Hood"
> Sent: Saturday, October 23, 2010 11:28am
> To: dev@cassandra.apache.org
> Subject
eadMessageBegin, old client?
-Original Message-
From: "Eric Evans"
Sent: Saturday, October 23, 2010 11:49am
To: dev@cassandra.apache.org
Subject: RE: [VOTE] 0.7.0 RC1
On Sat, 2010-10-23 at 11:44 -0500, Stu Hood wrote:
> Also, client connections fail immediately with a vers
On Sat, 2010-10-23 at 11:44 -0500, Stu Hood wrote:
> Also, client connections fail immediately with a version mismatch:
> something is not kosher with the Thrift build. Poor cats.
Not seeing this, the system tests pass here.
--
Eric Evans
eev...@rackspace.com
Also, client connections fail immediately with a version mismatch: something is
not kosher with the Thrift build. Poor cats.
-Original Message-
From: "Stu Hood"
Sent: Saturday, October 23, 2010 11:28am
To: dev@cassandra.apache.org
Subject: RE: [VOTE] 0.7.0 RC1
-1
bin/config
-1
bin/config-converter failed: see
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-1655
-Original Message-
From: "Eric Evans"
Sent: Friday, October 22, 2010 10:28pm
To: dev@cassandra.apache.org
Subject: [VOTE] 0.7.0 RC1
We're closing in on a final; it shouldn&#x
We're closing in on a final; it shouldn't be long now. I propose the
following for 0.7.0 Release Candidate 1.
SVN:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cassandra/branches/cassandra-...@r1026517
0.7.0-rc1 artifacts: http://people.apache.org/~eevans
The vote will be open for the usual 72 hours.
[1]
27 matches
Mail list logo
