t; > >
> > > Creating clarity for ourselves will help us build a better database,
> and
> > > creating clarity for our users will help give them the confidence to
> run
> > it.
> > >
> > > I want to thank Sumanth for his work on this document and to everyone
> > else
> > > who's cont
ll help give them the confidence to run
> it.
> >
> > I want to thank Sumanth for his work on this document and to everyone
> else
> > who's contributed.
> >
> > I support it (+1 nb).
> >
> > – Scott
> >
> >
>
work on this document and to everyone else
> who's contributed.
>
> I support it (+1 nb).
>
> – Scott
>
>
> From: Stefan Podkowinski
> Sent: Tuesday, October 1, 2019 1:43 PM
> To: dev@cassandra.apache.org
> Subject: Re:
Re: [VOTE] Apache Cassandra Release Lifecycle
What exactly will be the implication of the outcome of this vote, in
case the content is agreed upon? What's the proposal of the voting?
The document seems to be informative rather then formal. It's verbose on
definitions that should be commonly understood o
What exactly will be the implication of the outcome of this vote, in
case the content is agreed upon? What's the proposal of the voting?
The document seems to be informative rather then formal. It's verbose on
definitions that should be commonly understood or can only broadly
defined (what is
I made a couple of additional changes to the document based on the
comments, and there are a couple more that need to be addressed.
I will work on moving this document to cwiki.
Thanks,
Sumanth
On Tue, Oct 1, 2019 at 10:02 AM Dinesh Joshi wrote:
> There are a few points that need to be
There are a few points that need to be clarified in doc. I am also fine if we
want to adopt the document as-is and then refine it as we build experience with
the process.
Dinesh
> On Sep 30, 2019, at 3:24 PM, sankalp kohli wrote:
>
> Sure..lets do that.
>
> On Mon, Sep 30, 2019 at 3:21 PM
Sure..lets do that.
On Mon, Sep 30, 2019 at 3:21 PM Benedict Elliott Smith
wrote:
> Perhaps we should move the proposed document to the cwiki for purposes of
> voting? That way it's in a place owned by the project, with a permanent
> history. Otherwise it's not entirely clear what was voted
Perhaps we should move the proposed document to the cwiki for purposes of
voting? That way it's in a place owned by the project, with a permanent
history. Otherwise it's not entirely clear what was voted on.
On 30/09/2019, 20:10, "Sumanth Pasupuleti"
wrote:
+1
On Mon, Sep
Vote will be open for 72 hours.
On Mon, Sep 30, 2019 at 12:09 PM Sumanth Pasupuleti <
sumanth.pasupuleti...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1
>
> On Mon, Sep 30, 2019 at 12:00 PM Nate McCall wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > On Tue, Oct 1, 2019 at 7:52 AM sankalp kohli
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > > We have
+1
On Mon, Sep 30, 2019 at 12:00 PM Nate McCall wrote:
> +1
>
> On Tue, Oct 1, 2019 at 7:52 AM sankalp kohli
> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> > We have discussed in the email thread[1] about Apache Cassandra
> Release
> > Lifecycle. We came up with a doc[2] for it. Please vote on it if you
> agree
> >
+1
On Tue, Oct 1, 2019 at 7:52 AM sankalp kohli wrote:
> Hi,
> We have discussed in the email thread[1] about Apache Cassandra Release
> Lifecycle. We came up with a doc[2] for it. Please vote on it if you agree
> with the content of the doc[2].
>
> Thanks,
> Sankalp
>
> [1]
>
>
Hi,
We have discussed in the email thread[1] about Apache Cassandra Release
Lifecycle. We came up with a doc[2] for it. Please vote on it if you agree
with the content of the doc[2].
Thanks,
Sankalp
[1]
13 matches
Mail list logo
