Re: Are we ready for 4.0.0 (GA) ?

2021-06-15 Thread bened...@apache.org
: Re: Are we ready for 4.0.0 (GA) ? > > We do have to cut another RC given the seriousness of CASSANDRA-16735 > though, right? I do not disagree with that. I just would like to see us more precise with our expectations for releasing 4.0 GA, considering that we have already deeply tested

Re: Are we ready for 4.0.0 (GA) ?

2021-06-15 Thread Benjamin Lerer
a new logo 😊 > > Still, not disputing the need to ship GA soon. We do have to cut another > RC given the seriousness of CASSANDRA-16735 though, right? > > > From: Benjamin Lerer > Date: Tuesday, 15 June 2021 at 11:14 > To: dev@cassandra.apache.org > Subject: Re: Are we r

Re: Are we ready for 4.0.0 (GA) ?

2021-06-15 Thread bened...@apache.org
2021 at 11:14 To: dev@cassandra.apache.org Subject: Re: Are we ready for 4.0.0 (GA) ? As the list of flaky tests was filtered out I wanted to add some information about the test that revealed real issues. First there was a mistake: only 3 of the issues were revealed by flaky tests. The other one was

Re: Are we ready for 4.0.0 (GA) ?

2021-06-15 Thread Benjamin Lerer
es they're deploying, as heavy > contributors doing so provides us the best opportunity to catch these > issues before our users do. > > > > We're getting close. > > > > > > From: bened...@apache.org > > Sent: Monday, June 14, 2021 3:03 PM &

Re: Are we ready for 4.0.0 (GA) ?

2021-06-14 Thread Dinesh Joshi
ides us the best opportunity to catch these issues before our > users do. > > We're getting close. > > ________ > From: bened...@apache.org > Sent: Monday, June 14, 2021 3:03 PM > To: dev@cassandra.apache.org > Subject: Re: Are we ready for 4.0.0 (GA) ? > >

Re: Are we ready for 4.0.0 (GA) ?

2021-06-14 Thread Scott Andreas
users do. We're getting close. From: bened...@apache.org Sent: Monday, June 14, 2021 3:03 PM To: dev@cassandra.apache.org Subject: Re: Are we ready for 4.0.0 (GA) ? A rate of 4/30 is a rate of 13% true bugs, which worries me with respect to our promise of shipping a bug-free GA

Re: Are we ready for 4.0.0 (GA) ?

2021-06-14 Thread bened...@apache.org
have, or otherwise have a strong opinion. From: Ekaterina Dimitrova Date: Monday, 14 June 2021 at 20:51 To: dev@cassandra.apache.org Subject: Re: Are we ready for 4.0.0 (GA) ? To give some context around the flaky tests, I pulled a quick report for the fixed ones during the past two months. It is

Re: Are we ready for 4.0.0 (GA) ?

2021-06-14 Thread Ekaterina Dimitrova
To give some context around the flaky tests, I pulled a quick report for the fixed ones during the past two months. It is attached for your reference. To summarize, in two months 30 tickets for flaky tests were closed and only 4 of them were Cassandra bugs(marked in red in the report), the rest of

Re: Are we ready for 4.0.0 (GA) ?

2021-06-14 Thread Adam Holmberg
To the point of "long-term observability over flakies": I will mention here that we intend to deploy a tool called Butler that we have developed and used internally for a while. It compliments Jenkins to present different views of test results, allowing developers to better ascertain those tests t

Are we ready for 4.0.0 (GA) ?

2021-06-14 Thread Mick Semb Wever
Are we ready to cut 4.0.0 (GA) once the following tickets land? CASSANDRA-16733 – Allow operators to disable 'ALTER ... DROP COMPACT STORAGE' statements" CASSANDRA-16669 – Password obfuscation for DCL audit log statements CASSANDRA-16735 – Adding columns via ALTER TABLE can generate corrupt sst