Re: CASSANDRA-12888: Streaming and MVs

2016-12-07 Thread Benjamin Roth
Grmpf! 1000+ consecutive must be wrong. I guess I mixed sth up. But it repaired over and over again for 1 or 2 days. 2016-12-07 9:01 GMT+01:00 Benjamin Roth : > Hi Paolo, > > First of all thanks for your review! > > I had the same concerns as you but I thought it is beeing handled > correctly (wh

Re: CASSANDRA-12888: Streaming and MVs

2016-12-07 Thread Benjamin Roth
Hi Paolo, First of all thanks for your review! I had the same concerns as you but I thought it is beeing handled correctly (which does in some situations) but I found one that creates the inconsistencies you mentioned. That is kind of split brain syndrom, when multiple nodes fail between repairs.

Re: CASSANDRA-12888: Streaming and MVs

2016-12-06 Thread Paulo Motta
Hello Benjamin, Thanks for your effort on this investigation! For bootstraps and range transfers, I think we can indeed simplify and stream base tables and MVs as ordinary tables, unless there is some caveat I'm missing (I didn't find any special case for bootstrap/range transfers on CASSANDRA-647

CASSANDRA-12888: Streaming and MVs

2016-12-02 Thread Benjamin Roth
As I haven't received a single reply on that, I went over to implement and test it on my own with our production cluster. I had a real pain with bringing up a new node, so I had to move on. Result: Works like a charm. I ran many dtests that relate in any way with storage, stream, bootstrap, ... wi