Hi Jay,
Here's the backport to 3.0.14 -
https://github.com/whangsf/cassandra/commit/8db2e3ed412e42fed1da2d85ee7d086edcc8ae4c.
This should pass all unit tests, but please let me know if you have any
issues.
Thanks,
Andrew
On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 7:35 PM, Jay Zhuang
wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
>
> Do yo
Hi Andrew,
Do you mind sharing the backport patch? We're very interested in that,
20-30% improvement sounds great to us.
Thanks,
Jay
On 7/27/17 11:52 PM, Andrew Whang wrote:
> Yes, seeing latency improvement after backporting 9472 to 3.0.13. We are
> measuring p99 latency, thus moving objects of
+1. IMO there’s very little reason to use 3.0 at this point. If someone wants
to back port and make a 3.0 patch publicly available, cool, but merging it into
3.0 after 2 years doesn’t make much sense to me.
> On Jul 31, 2017, at 9:26 AM, Jeremiah D Jordan
> wrote:
>
>
>> On Jul 31, 2017, a
> On Jul 31, 2017, at 12:17 PM, Jeff Jirsa wrote:
> On 2017-07-29 10:02 (-0700), Jay Zhuang wrote:
>> Should we consider back-porting it to 3.0 for the community? I think
>> this is a performance regression instead of new feature. And we have the
>> feature in 2.1, 2.2.
>>
>
> Personally / in
On 2017-07-29 10:02 (-0700), Jay Zhuang wrote:
> Should we consider back-porting it to 3.0 for the community? I think
> this is a performance regression instead of new feature. And we have the
> feature in 2.1, 2.2.
>
Personally / individually, I'd much rather see 3.0 stabilize.
---
Should we consider back-porting it to 3.0 for the community? I think
this is a performance regression instead of new feature. And we have the
feature in 2.1, 2.2.
On 7/27/17 11:52 PM, Andrew Whang wrote:
> Yes, seeing latency improvement after backporting 9472 to 3.0.13. We are
> measuring p99 lat
Yes, seeing latency improvement after backporting 9472 to 3.0.13. We are
measuring p99 latency, thus moving objects off heap improved gc stalls,
which directly affects our read/write p99 latency.
On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 10:54 PM, Jeff Jirsa wrote:
> This is after you backported 9472 to 3.0?
>
>
This is after you backported 9472 to 3.0?
--
Jeff Jirsa
> On Jul 27, 2017, at 10:33 PM, Andrew Whang wrote:
>
> Jay,
>
> We see ~20% write latency improvement on 3.0.13 in a write-heavy workload,
> using offheap_objects. offheap_buffers only offered minimal improvement.
>
> On Thu, Jul 27,
Jay,
We see ~20% write latency improvement on 3.0.13 in a write-heavy workload,
using offheap_objects. offheap_buffers only offered minimal improvement.
On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 10:06 PM, Jay Zhuang
wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
>
> Do you see performance gain from reintroducing off-heap memtables for
> 3
Hi Andrew,
Do you see performance gain from reintroducing off-heap memtables for
3.0.x? When we were on 2.2.x we saw big improvements from enabling
off-heap memtables.
Thanks,
Jay
On 7/27/17 9:37 PM, Andrew Whang wrote:
> I'm wondering if anyone has been able to patch CASSANDRA-9472 to 3.0,
> wi
I'm wondering if anyone has been able to patch CASSANDRA-9472 to 3.0,
without breaking unit tests. The patch was introduced in 3.4, but 3.0.x
contains unit tests and code from later 3.x releases, which makes debugging
unit test failures difficult - i.e. SSTableCorruptionDetectionTest, which
was int
11 matches
Mail list logo
