On Wed, May 15, 2024 at 12:09 AM Mick Semb Wever wrote:
> Yes Dinesh. João Reis managed to get hold of both Chris and Martin.
>>> Responses have been slow, but everyone is on board. This is not to be
>>> considered a hostile fork, despite in all likelihood not being able to do a
>>> full IP
>
> Ok, so we're got confidence now on how to approach this, confirmation from
>> the project's maintainers supporting it, and interest from a handful of
>> people interested in maintaining and contributing to the project.
>>
>
> Did you talk to the current maintainers off list or did I miss some
On Tue, May 14, 2024 at 10:05 AM Mick Semb Wever wrote:
>
> Ok, so we're got confidence now on how to approach this, confirmation from
> the project's maintainers supporting it, and interest from a handful of
> people interested in maintaining and contributing to the project.
>
Did you talk to
Does anyone call out the need for a new CEP for bringing the gocql into the
Driver's subproject ?
> My suggestion is that this falls under CEP-8, even if it is not DataStax
> donating this particular codebase, the process is largely the same and it is
> the Drivers subproject receiving it.
+1
Ok, so we're got confidence now on how to approach this, confirmation from
the project's maintainers supporting it, and interest from a handful of
people interested in maintaining and contributing to the project.
The proposed plan forward is…
We will go through a round of collecting CLAs along
Hello,
We are serious looking at picking up this driver here at Instaclustr. I will
keep this thread updated.
On 2024/04/15 10:31:49 Mick Semb Wever wrote:
> We can open an issue with LEGAL to see what they say at least?
> >>
> >
> >
> > I will raise a LEGAL ticket.
> >
> > My question here is
We can open an issue with LEGAL to see what they say at least?
>>
>
>
> I will raise a LEGAL ticket.
>
> My question here is whether we have to go through the process of
> best-efforts to get approval to donate (transfer copyright), or whether we
> can honour the copyright on the prior work and
> tl,dr:
> - The AUTHORS lists everyone who ever made a commit (
> https://github.com/gocql/gocql/blob/master/AUTHORS)
> - The license is BSD-3 and explicitly says the copyright is owned by the
> authors (https://github.com/gocql/gocql/blob/master/LICENSE#L1)
> - We had a previous discussion about
If we take this on - are there any active contributors that can be raised
as committers to maintain this project?
On Wed, Apr 3, 2024 at 2:36 PM Nate McCall wrote:
> We've talked through this before. Benjamin sussed out the main issue,
> IIRC.
> tl,dr:
> - The AUTHORS lists everyone who ever
We've talked through this before. Benjamin sussed out the main issue, IIRC.
tl,dr:
- The AUTHORS lists everyone who ever made a commit (
https://github.com/gocql/gocql/blob/master/AUTHORS)
- The license is BSD-3 and explicitly says the copyright is owned by the
authors
The current sole maintainer of the gocql driver has stated the project is
essentially in attic mode and is asking for new maintainers.
https://groups.google.com/g/gocql/c/v0FruczBb2w
No one has suggested the repo be donated to the ASF yet, but before anyone
should raise any such suggestion we
11 matches
Mail list logo
