All right. With no dissenting opinions, let's make this the new plan of record.
I've created https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-4734 for
the protocol change; let's get that into beta2 and take it from there.
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 8:22 AM, Brandon Williams dri...@gmail.com wrote:
+1
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 7:16 PM, Jonathan Ellis jbel...@gmail.com wrote:
We are more or less on track for the promised late October 1.2 release
[1] but I'm starting to think we should expand the scope of 1.2 a bit
to get cql3 and the corresponding binary protocol truly right.
+1
26 sep 2012 kl. 15:56 skrev Sylvain Lebresne sylv...@datastax.com:
+1
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 7:16 PM, Jonathan Ellis jbel...@gmail.com wrote:
We are more or less on track for the promised late October 1.2 release
[1] but I'm starting to think we should expand the scope of 1.2 a bit
to
+1
The vnode troubleshooting process has been rough, so I'm all for more
testing there.
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 12:16 PM, Jonathan Ellis jbel...@gmail.com wrote:
We are more or less on track for the promised late October 1.2 release
[1] but I'm starting to think we should expand the scope of
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 11:16 AM, Jonathan Ellis jbel...@gmail.com wrote:
2) The binary protocol only really has a Java implementation so far.
Having the time to flesh out the Python implementation would be a good
sanity check before we commit to protocol stability.
Just to clarify, the
