CASSANDRA-17280 and CASSANDRA-17281 were opened to cover the work. Thank you
On Sun, 23 Jan 2022 at 11:46, Joshua McKenzie wrote:
> Lazy consensus seems like a safe path here.
>
> https://community.apache.org/committers/lazyConsensus.html
>
> On Sat, Jan 22, 2022 at 4:24 PM Ekaterina Dimitrova
Lazy consensus seems like a safe path here.
https://community.apache.org/committers/lazyConsensus.html
On Sat, Jan 22, 2022 at 4:24 PM Ekaterina Dimitrova
wrote:
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> Thank you for responding to my email.
>
> Looking at the responses, I guess I should directly open tickets -
Hi everyone,
Thank you for responding to my email.
Looking at the responses, I guess I should directly open tickets - one for
deprecating in 4.0.2 (just warning and documenting it) and one for the
removal/providing interface for trunk?
Do we need more formal voting or anything else that I might
+1
Best Regards,
Aleksei Zotov.
On Thu, Jan 20, 2022 at 11:52 AM Marcus Eriksson wrote:
> +1
>
> On Tue, Jan 18, 2022 at 11:30:01AM -0500, Ekaterina Dimitrova wrote:
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > With the work to add Java 17 support for Cassandra, a new question around
> > the future of UDF was
+1
On Tue, Jan 18, 2022 at 11:30:01AM -0500, Ekaterina Dimitrova wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> With the work to add Java 17 support for Cassandra, a new question around
> the future of UDF was raised. The scripted UDF was using Nashorn which is
> no longer packaged with the JDK. There are options to
+1 to deprecate, drop, add hooks.
On Wed, Jan 19, 2022 at 2:22 PM Brandon Williams wrote:
> Yes, just javascript.
>
> On Wed, Jan 19, 2022 at 1:20 PM Yifan Cai wrote:
> >>
> >> I think we should deprecate scripted UDFs now and drop them from the
> next major, but possibly provide hooks for
Yes, just javascript.
On Wed, Jan 19, 2022 at 1:20 PM Yifan Cai wrote:
>>
>> I think we should deprecate scripted UDFs now and drop them from the next
>> major, but possibly provide hooks for people to write their own UDF
>> "engines" and break out the current javascript implementation in to
>
> I think we should deprecate scripted UDFs now and drop them from the next
> major, but possibly provide hooks for people to write their own UDF
> "engines" and break out the current javascript implementation in to its own
> repository (but not ship it with Cassandra).
+1
Just want to
+1 (nb)
On 2022/01/19 15:10:20 Brandon Williams wrote:
> We can for completeness, but even with twice as much usage reported as the
> other methods, I don't think it will affect the outcome of the vote.
>
> On Wed, Jan 19, 2022, 7:25 AM Paulo Motta wrote:
>
> > This proposal looks good to me,
We can for completeness, but even with twice as much usage reported as the
other methods, I don't think it will affect the outcome of the vote.
On Wed, Jan 19, 2022, 7:25 AM Paulo Motta wrote:
> This proposal looks good to me, +1. I was wondering if we should not run
> this proposal on the
This proposal looks good to me, +1. I was wondering if we should not run
this proposal on the user@ list to check if there's any additional feedback
in addition to the informal Twitter and Linkedin channels?
Em qua., 19 de jan. de 2022 às 10:18, Sylwester Lachiewicz <
slachiew...@gmail.com>
+1 (Nb)
śr., 19 sty 2022, 12:31 użytkownik Brandon Williams
napisał:
> +1
>
> On Tue, Jan 18, 2022 at 10:30 AM Ekaterina Dimitrova
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > With the work to add Java 17 support for Cassandra, a new question
> around the future of UDF was raised. The scripted UDF
+1
On Tue, Jan 18, 2022 at 10:30 AM Ekaterina Dimitrova
wrote:
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> With the work to add Java 17 support for Cassandra, a new question around the
> future of UDF was raised. The scripted UDF was using Nashorn which is no
> longer packaged with the JDK. There are options to add
+1
> On Jan 18, 2022, at 8:38 AM, Jonathan Ellis wrote:
>
>
> +1
>
>> On Tue, Jan 18, 2022 at 10:34 AM C. Scott Andreas
>> wrote:
>> I also (+1nb) support a proposal to deprecate JavaScript UDFs; to offer an
>> interface for those who would like to supply a UDF implementation; and to
>>
+1
On Tue, Jan 18, 2022 at 10:34 AM C. Scott Andreas
wrote:
> I also (+1nb) support a proposal to deprecate JavaScript UDFs; to offer an
> interface for those who would like to supply a UDF implementation; and to
> extract/remove our current implementation.
>
> JDK17 support seems like a much
I also (+1nb) support a proposal to deprecate JavaScript UDFs; to offer an
interface for those who would like to supply a UDF implementation; and to
extract/remove our current implementation.
JDK17 support seems like a much higher priority than in-tree JS UDFs.
— Scott
> On Jan 18, 2022, at
Hi everyone,
With the work to add Java 17 support for Cassandra, a new question around
the future of UDF was raised. The scripted UDF was using Nashorn which is
no longer packaged with the JDK. There are options to add new dependencies
to Graal JS for example but it seems people are not sure that
17 matches
Mail list logo
