Thanks for the infos,
I will try aerospike also, they are always including a one node
installation on there benchmarking and are also talking about vertical
scalability.
Kind regards.
Le jeu. 18 oct. 2018 14:44, Aleksey Yeshchenko a écrit :
> I agree with Jeff here.
>
> Furthermore,
I agree with Jeff here.
Furthermore, Cassandra should generally be your solution of last resort - if
nothing else works out.
In your case I’d try sqlite or leveldb (or rocksdb).
> On 18 Oct 2018, at 11:46, Jeff Jirsa wrote:
>
> I can’t think of a situation where I’d choose Cassandra as a
>
> ---> Postgresql allows you tu use array type or map type with dynamic
> number of records, provided of course that the cardinality of the
> collection is not "too" big
>
Thanks for these details, but what do you mean about the cardinality of the
collection is not too big ?
In my solution a
I can’t think of a situation where I’d choose Cassandra as a database in a
single-host use case (if you’re sure it’ll never be more than one machine).
--
Jeff Jirsa
> On Oct 18, 2018, at 12:31 PM, Abdelkrim Fitouri wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I am wondering if using cassandra as one local
I have an application with a purpose to store a dynamic number of colones
on each rows (thing that i cannot do with classical relational database),
---> Postgresql allows you tu use array type or map type with dynamic
number of records, provided of course that the cardinality of the
collection
Hello,
I am wondering if using cassandra as one local database without the cluster
capabilities has a sens, (i cannot do multi node cluster due to a technical
constraint)
I have an application with a purpose to store a dynamic number of colones
on each rows (thing that i cannot do with classical
