non-binding +1
On 2017-03-29 15:21, Jason Brown wrote:
Hey all,
Following up my thread from a week or two ago (
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/0665f40c7213654e99817141972c003a2131aba7a1c63d6765db75c5@%3Cdev.cassandra.apache.org%3E),
I'd like to propose a vote to change to allow any
+1
On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 4:42 PM, Benjamin Lerer wrote:
> Non binding +1
>
> On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 4:24 PM, Jonathan Haddad
> wrote:
>
> > Non binding +1
> > On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 7:22 AM Jeff Jirsa wrote:
> >
> > > +1
Hey all,
Following up my thread from a week or two ago (
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/0665f40c7213654e99817141972c003a2131aba7a1c63d6765db75c5@%3Cdev.cassandra.apache.org%3E),
I'd like to propose a vote to change to allow any potential contributor to
assign a jira to themselves without
+1 non-binding. I’ve always wondered why that restriction was in place.
> On Mar 29, 2017, at 8:21 AM, Jason Brown wrote:
>
> Hey all,
>
> Following up my thread from a week or two ago (
>
non-binding +1, too.
—
Robert Stupp
@snazy
> On 29. Mar 2017, at 15:21, Jason Brown wrote:
>
> Hey all,
>
> Following up my thread from a week or two ago (
>
+1
--
Jeff Jirsa
> On Mar 29, 2017, at 6:21 AM, Jason Brown wrote:
>
> Hey all,
>
> Following up my thread from a week or two ago (
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/0665f40c7213654e99817141972c003a2131aba7a1c63d6765db75c5@%3Cdev.cassandra.apache.org%3E),
> I'd
Non binding +1
On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 7:22 AM Jeff Jirsa wrote:
> +1
>
> --
> Jeff Jirsa
>
>
> > On Mar 29, 2017, at 6:21 AM, Jason Brown wrote:
> >
> > Hey all,
> >
> > Following up my thread from a week or two ago (
> >
>
Hi,
I think we should support something that we can scale out and that can
produce consistent reproducible results.
One of the longer term issues is going to be different CI systems
producing different sets of failures. It's not going to happen often but
it will and it's one way flakiness will
Non-binding +1
On 2017-03-29 08:42 (-0700), Sankalp Kohli wrote:
> +1
>
> > On Mar 29, 2017, at 07:50, Sylvain Lebresne wrote:
> >
> > +1
> >
> > On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 4:42 PM, Benjamin Lerer >> wrote:
> >
> >>
+1
> On Mar 29, 2017, at 07:50, Sylvain Lebresne wrote:
>
> +1
>
> On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 4:42 PM, Benjamin Lerer > wrote:
>
>> Non binding +1
>>
>> On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 4:24 PM, Jonathan Haddad
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
+1
+1 super binding.
--
AY
On 29 March 2017 at 16:22:03, Jason Brown (jasedbr...@gmail.com) wrote:
Hey all,
Following up my thread from a week or two ago (
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/0665f40c7213654e99817141972c003a2131aba7a1c63d6765db75c5@%3Cdev.cassandra.apache.org%3E),
I'd
+1
On 03/29/2017 08:21 AM, Jason Brown wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> Following up my thread from a week or two ago (
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/0665f40c7213654e99817141972c003a2131aba7a1c63d6765db75c5@%3Cdev.cassandra.apache.org%3E),
> I'd like to propose a vote to change to allow any
+1
On 2017-03-29 09:21, Jason Brown wrote:
Hey all,
Following up my thread from a week or two ago (
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/0665f40c7213654e99817141972c003a2131aba7a1c63d6765db75c5@%3Cdev.cassandra.apache.org%3E),
I'd like to propose a vote to change to allow any potential
+1
On 3/29/17, 2:52 PM, "Michael Shuler" wrote:
+1
On 03/29/2017 08:21 AM, Jason Brown wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> Following up my thread from a week or two ago (
>
+1 non-binding. That requirement always seemed silly to me.
> On Mar 29, 2017, at 8:21 AM, Jason Brown wrote:
>
> Hey all,
>
> Following up my thread from a week or two ago (
>
On Sat, Mar 18, 2017 at 9:21 PM, Qingcun Zhou wrote:
> I wanted to contribute some unit test cases. However the unit test approach
> in Cassandra seems weird to me after looking into some examples. Not sure
> if anyone else has the same feeling.
>
> Usually, at least for
oops, hit sent too early. will send another email shortly
On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 6:14 AM, Jason Brown wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> Following up on my emai
>
Sorry,
This feature does not exist.
On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 3:13 AM, Ramesh Mani wrote:
> Hello Cassandra team members,
>
> I am looking for API via which I can get the CQL session query as string?
> Is there a way I can get the Query executed by the users via API
>
>
19 matches
Mail list logo