> We are looking to contribute Reaper to the Cassandra project.
>
Just to clarify are you proposing contributing Reaper as a project via
donation or you are planning on contributing the features of Reaper as
patches to Cassandra? If the former how far along are you on the donation
process? If the
I think that the pros of incubating the sidecar in tree as a tool first
outweigh the alternatives at this point of time. Rough tradeoffs that I see:
Unique pros of in tree sidecar:
* Faster iteration speed in general. For example when we need to add a new
JMX endpoint that the sidecar needs, or
Hi,
Here is how I think we can make progress
1. Consensus is reached that we need side car as this thread is months old
and I do not see any objections. I bumped it again and it is good to see it
being active.
2. There is no consensus on new repo vs not. I will start a thread on it
and lets
+1 to everything that Joey articulated with emphasis on the fact that
contributions should be evaluated based on the merit of code and their
value add to the whole offering. I hope it does not matter whether that
contribution comes from PMC member or a person who is not a committer. I
would like
Hi,
I am starting a new thread to get consensus on where the side car
should be contributed.
Please send your responses with pro/cons of each approach or any other
approach. Please be clear which approach you will pick while still giving
pros/cons of both approaches.
Thanks.
Sankalp
On Mon, Aug 20, 2018 at 4:23 AM Mick Semb Wever wrote:
>
> We are looking to contribute Reaper to the Cassandra project.
>
> Looking at the patch it's very similar in its base design already, but
> Reaper does has a lot more to offer. We have all been working hard to move
> it to also being a
An option is to create a mono repo with Cassandra and SideCar as modules that
could be built independently. This would keep source for both artifacts in the
same repo and have their own release cadences. That said, I don't have any
strong opinions at this point. We can try going with a separate
On Mon, Aug 20, 2018 at 4:14 PM Roopa Tangirala
wrote:
> contributions should be evaluated based on the merit of code and their
> value add to the whole offering. I hope it does not matter whether that
> contribution comes from PMC member or a person who is not a committer.
I hope this goes
On Fri, 17 Aug 2018, at 14:27, Sankalp Kohli wrote:
> I am bumping this thread because patch has landed for this with repair
> functionality.
We are looking to contribute Reaper to the Cassandra project.
Looking at the patch it's very similar in its base design already, but Reaper
does
