Any objections if this confluence page comes out of draft?
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=153815764
Ideally I would have liked to see more added to the CircleCI half of the
page, but I see no reason that's holding the document from being considered
accurate or
Hi all,
working on CASSANDRA-13047 we noticed there's a skinny CQL help file
in-tree to where the 'help' command takes you to. This, iiuc, is to
support help on topics for envs with reduced connectivity where they
can't go online.
Is this correct? And shouldn't it be preferable to replace that
>
> The following metrics provide top lists of contributors for different time
> periods. Listing patches, reviews, and who has worked with who.
> It's intended to give insight into (and to praise) the people who are
> contributing code to the project.
>
+1
On Mon, Aug 9, 2021 at 1:00 AM Mick Semb Wever wrote:
>
> Any objections if this confluence page comes out of draft?
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=153815764
>
>
>
> Ideally I would have liked to see more added to the CircleCI half of the
> page, but I see
+1 from me. There is a lot of good info on that page, no need to keep it draft
that I can see.
> On Aug 9, 2021, at 1:00 AM, Mick Semb Wever wrote:
>
> Any objections if this confluence page comes out of draft?
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=153815764
>
>
>
> And shouldn't it be preferable to replace that skinny
> page with a local copy of the CQL docs?
>
Our binaries don't ship with all-the-docs.
This has been discussed during the work for the new website and its new
antora build system: CASSANDRA-16761 and CASSANDRA-16763.
That is, it would be
+1 and I can add some info around CircleCI too.
Thank you
On Mon, 9 Aug 2021 at 9:16, Brandon Williams wrote:
> +1
>
> On Mon, Aug 9, 2021 at 1:00 AM Mick Semb Wever wrote:
> >
> > Any objections if this confluence page comes out of draft?
> >
>
The following metrics provide top lists of contributors for different time
periods. Listing patches, reviews, and who has worked with who.
It's intended to give insight into (and to praise) the people who are
contributing code to the project.
Just my random thoughts as an outsider while trying to look at this thread
months after the fact. I could have missed some details along the way and
might not quite understand the final proposal.
On this topic in general, it seems a bit odd to me to have support / fixes
for a release defined
Thank you Brandon, for answering my questions on slack, and providing early
feedback on these ideas more than a month before I created the patches and
replying here.
Does anyone else have any comments or opinions? Can a decision be reached
one way or another? It is my understanding that we'll
+1
On Mon, Aug 9, 2021 at 10:54 AM Jeremiah D Jordan
wrote:
> +1 from me. There is a lot of good info on that page, no need to keep it
> draft that I can see.
>
> > On Aug 9, 2021, at 1:00 AM, Mick Semb Wever wrote:
> >
> > Any objections if this confluence page comes out of draft?
> >
>
On Mon, Aug 9, 2021 at 2:05 PM Scott Carey wrote:
> Does anyone else have any comments or opinions? Can a decision be reached
> one way or another? It is my understanding that we'll need more than one
> +1 to move forward here.
Lazy consensus says 72 hours
Thx for the reply Mick,
I will join the loop in those tickets.
On 9/8/21 14:14, Mick Semb Wever wrote:
>> And shouldn't it be preferable to replace that skinny
>> page with a local copy of the CQL docs?
>>
>
> Our binaries don't ship with all-the-docs.
>
> This has been discussed during the work
13 matches
Mail list logo
