Re: Proposal: release 2.2 (based on current trunk) before 3.0 (based on 8099)

Added those to the list, thanks. On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 3:30 AM, Robert Stupp wrote: > I’ve got one - UDF using ecj instead of javassist ( > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-8241 < > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-8241>). Not sure whether > the licensing thing is

Re: May 2015 Retrospective

Hi all, Thank you for your participation. I think this retrospective went really well and people are getting the hang of it. If you haven't read it since it was started take a quick look when you have a chance. In addition to what participants added I also commented on #9098 and #9036, but didn't

Re: Proposal: release 2.2 (based on current trunk) before 3.0 (based on 8099)

I’ve got one - UDF using ecj instead of javassist (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-8241 ). Not sure whether the licensing thing is fine that way (about what ”appropriately labeled“ really means in https://www.apache.org/legal

Re: Proposal: release 2.2 (based on current trunk) before 3.0 (based on 8099)

We should get https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-8568 in 2.2 as well (it is patch avail and I'll get it reviewed this week) /Marcus On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 9:42 PM, Jonathan Ellis wrote: > Sounds good. I will add the new version to Jira. > > Planned tickets to block 2.2 beta for: