Re: Consistent vs inconsistent range movements

Also https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-11005 On Fri, Mar 3, 2017 at 3:57 PM, Brandon Williams wrote: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-11610 > > Disable only if adding single nodes to different DCs or racks. > > On Fri, Mar 3, 2017 at 5:44 PM,

Re: Consistent vs inconsistent range movements

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-11610 Disable only if adding single nodes to different DCs or racks. On Fri, Mar 3, 2017 at 5:44 PM, Jeff Jirsa wrote: > Imagine you have a cluster with RF=3, and you write a key with CL:QUORUM, > it goes to nodes 1 and 3, but

Re: Consistent vs inconsistent range movements

Imagine you have a cluster with RF=3, and you write a key with CL:QUORUM, it goes to nodes 1 and 3, but node 2 is offline. Some time later, node 2 comes online. Then you want to add node 2.5 in between nodes 1 and 3. If you stream data from node 2, you violate consistency guarantees (quorum) -

Consistent vs inconsistent range movements

Hi, Can anyone tell the difference between consistent + inconsistent range movements? What exactly makes them consistent or inconsistent? In what situations can both of them occur? It would be great to get a correct and deep understanding of that for further MV improvments. My intuition tells me

Question on configuring Apache Cassandra with LDAP

I am trying to configure Cassnadra with LDAP , and I am trying to write code and want to extend the functionality of org.apache.cassandra.auth.PasswordAuthenticator and override authenticate method but As PlainTextSaslAuthenticator innerclass has a private scope not able to use method

Re: State of triggers

Does Cassandra itself use triggers internally for something? That would make a pretty good case for triggers being ready for production use. Otherwise, it would tend to be a neglected feature because active developers would have no good reason to add features to it other than just make the test

Re: State of triggers

On Fri, Mar 3, 2017 at 5:40 AM, Edward Capriolo wrote: > > I used them. I built do it yourself secondary indexes with them. They have > there gotchas, but so do all the secondary index implementations. Just > because datastax does not write about something. Lets see like 5